This paper examines the strategic decision-making process for Onetech, a publicly funded IT development services organization considering a transition to a self-funded membership model. The paper evaluates three operational options — relocating to a cost-effective facility, moving to a smaller premise with staff reductions, or undertaking massive downsizing — analyzing the pros, cons, and financial implications of each. Drawing on expected value calculations and a minimax regret framework, the paper recommends Option 1 combined with a €4,000 annual membership fee targeting 150 customers and a medium revenue scenario of €600,000. The paper also assesses Onetech's internal decision-making process against the rational decision-making model, identifying key weaknesses in employee involvement and information collection.
Onetech is a publicly funded organization specializing in the provision of development services for staff employed in the Information Technology sector. The organization is currently considering a transition from its current model of public funding to self-funding. The principle of this new business model would be that client firms pay an annual membership fee, based on which they would continue to benefit from the services provided by Onetech.
The dilemma raised at this stage concerns the nature of the services still to be provided by the firm, any downsizing processes that would be required, and the appropriate size of the membership fee. Three alternatives have been put forward for consideration:
Aside from the services component, the organization must also decide on the most effective means of implementing the change process and addressing the budgetary concerns associated with it. Three options have been devised in this regard and are presented and analyzed below.
Option 1 — Moving to a more cost-effective facility:
Option 2 — Moving to an even smaller premise:
Option 3 — Massive downsizing:
In order for the analysis to be conclusive, it must be conducted along two specific directions. The first involves assessing the three alternative options, and the second involves assessing the revenue structures for the most desirable alternative. The analysis of the three alternatives is conducted through a systematic review of the pros and cons of each option.
Option 1 — Moving to a more cost-effective facility:
Pros:
Cons:
Option 2 — Moving to an even smaller premise:
Pros:
Cons:
Option 3 — Massive downsizing:
Pros:
Cons:
The costs associated with Options 2 and 3 are more than Onetech can reasonably bear, and the advantages of Option 1 are necessary to ensure a successful transition. It is therefore recommended that the firm focus on moving into a more cost-effective facility, preserving its staff and their intellectual capital, and striving to consolidate its position.
Based on the analysis conducted, it becomes clear that the best alternative for Onetech is to preserve its current staff structure and relocate to a more cost-effective facility. With this decision made, the analysis moves on to the revenue structure to be implemented throughout the change process.
The table below analyzes the three revenue scenarios through the lenses of optimism, pessimism, and regret.
The revenue structure of €600,000 appears the most pertinent, representing a medium value between the optimistic and pessimistic scenarios. The principal problem with the optimistic revenue target of €900,000 is the challenge of attracting sufficient customers.
At a fixed membership fee of €6,000, the required customer numbers are as follows:
By selecting a fixed membership fee of €6,000, the company would need to:
At a fixed membership fee of €4,000, the required customer numbers are as follows:
By selecting a fixed membership fee of €4,000, Onetech would need to:
All of these alternatives are difficult to assess with certainty given variables of uncertainty, the firm's relative lack of business experience, and changing economic conditions. Nevertheless, within the context analyzed, it is recommended that the company implement a medium revenue target of €600,000, charging an annual membership fee of €4,000.
Such a strategy would require the firm to attract 150 customers, which is a relatively high number. However, this objective could be achieved through marketing efficiencies (Wreden, 2007), as well as through the appeal of the lower membership fee. A more accessible price point helps customers make their purchasing decisions in favor of Onetech's services (Tybout and Calder, 2010).
"Expected value calculation and profit estimate"
"Rational model critique of Onetech's process"
Tybout, A. M., & Calder, B. J. (2010). Kellogg on marketing (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
Wreden, N. (2007). Profit brand: How to increase the profitability, accountability and sustainability of brands. Kogan Page Publishers.
The Happy Manager. (2011). Rational decision making model. Retrieved November 30, 2011, from
Tools for decision analysis: Analysis of risky decisions. University of Baltimore. Retrieved November 30, 2011, from http://home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/opre640a/partix.htm
You’re 27% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.