Amazon vs. Borders Books: Strategy, Failure & Success
This paper analyzes the contrasting histories, business models, and management philosophies of Amazon.com and Borders Books. It examines how each company approached Internet marketing, fulfillment, and supply chain management, identifying three key success factors for Amazon and three factors that contributed to Borders' eventual bankruptcy in 2011. The paper also evaluates each management team's capacity to anticipate and respond to shifting market conditions, highlighting Amazon's technology-driven, customer-centric model against Borders' traditional retail approach. The analysis concludes with three recommendations for building greater organizational flexibility into decision-making processes to help companies remain agile in dynamic competitive environments.
- Introduction: Two Booksellers, Two Visions: Origins and value chains of Amazon and Borders
- Comparing and Contrasting Approaches to Internet Marketing and Sales: How each company handled online marketing and fulfillment
- Analyzing Amazon's Critical Success Factors: Three factors behind Amazon's e-commerce dominance
- Borders' Key Success Factors and Their Demise as a Corporation: What Borders did well and why it still failed
- Management's Ability to Adapt to Changing Market Conditions: Contrasting how each management team handled change
- Building Greater Flexibility Into the Decision-Making Process: Three recommendations for strategic agility
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a clear parallel structure — each section addresses both companies side by side, making comparison easy to follow and analytically coherent.
- Grounds abstract strategic claims in concrete operational details, such as the 72-hour vs. 48-hour fulfillment comparison, which vividly illustrates Amazon's competitive advantage.
- Integrates peer-reviewed and trade sources (e.g., Harvard Business Review, Journal of Business Research) to support business strategy arguments, lending credibility to the analysis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective comparative case analysis — a standard technique in business studies where two firms are evaluated against shared criteria (value chain, marketing strategy, adaptability) to extract broader lessons. Rather than treating each company in isolation, the author consistently returns to the contrast between them, allowing the evidence from one case to illuminate the weaknesses of the other.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a dual history section establishing each company's origins and value chain philosophy. It then narrows focus to Internet marketing and fulfillment practices before dedicating separate sections to each firm's critical success factors. A comparative section on management adaptability bridges the case studies to the paper's concluding recommendations, which synthesize lessons from both companies into actionable strategic guidance. This funnel structure — broad history to specific factors to applied recommendations — is well-suited to business case analysis at the undergraduate level.
Introduction: Two Booksellers, Two Visions
This analysis evaluates the history and core business of Amazon.com and Borders Books, comparing and contrasting their respective management approaches to Internet marketing and fulfillment — two areas in which each company operated very differently. Three factors that contributed to Amazon's success are examined alongside three factors that led Borders to bankruptcy despite having once operated a flourishing and profitable retail business. In analyzing each company, the ability of each management team to anticipate and react successfully to changing market conditions is also assessed. Finally, three recommendations are offered for how each company could have built greater flexibility into its decision-making process to remain more agile and better able to adapt to shifting market conditions.
Both Amazon and Borders began with the goal of becoming a global leader in book selling and content distribution, yet each defined its value chain in a completely different way. Amazon began with the goal of being the world's largest online bookstore, and after years of work on its distributed order management and fulfillment systems, launched its first website in 1995. During this period, the company also became the exclusive book retailer for America Online, Netscape, and other websites that were just beginning to engage in e-commerce. Amazon's focus on supply chain management, logistics, distributed order management, and later investments in recommendation engines — which automatically suggested books a customer might find interesting — became a strong differentiator throughout the latter 1990s and into the 21st century. Amazon also nurtured strong skills in forming alliances and partnerships, in addition to developing innovative technologies built on its rapidly expanding technology platform. Amazon learned early how to harness the commitment and support of its customers to gain greater insights, and a kind of volunteerism around the brand emerged as a result (Cook, 2008). The Amazon Web Services (AWS) business unit originated from the core set of technologies used to manage the massive online bookstore and multi-country language localization requirements (DataMonitor, 2010). Amazon was listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange in 1997 and is today one of the most profitable e-commerce stocks available to investors. The Amazon value chain is fueled by high-margin opportunities best capitalized upon through innovative technologies and supply chain systems that minimize costs and maximize inventory turns.
In contrast stands Borders Books. Borders began in 1971, founded by Louis and Tom Borders in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The company was initially formed to sell used books and over time began to carry new titles as well. Through the first two decades of its existence, the company continued focusing on the service and distribution aspects of its business, strengthening its channel partnerships and alliances with large bookstores. As the market for independent bookstores appeared increasingly saturated with suppliers, Borders management chose to open a second store in Birmingham, Michigan. Borders successfully made the transition into retail chain operations and continued to build to a peak of 516 stores, along with 385 Waldenbooks specialty locations nationwide. February 2011 proved a very difficult time for Borders, as the company was forced to file a petition for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As part of the petition, Borders partnered with liquidators who closed the 200 lowest-performing stores. That same month, the company was delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, and from that point through October 2011, the company fully liquidated, selling off its assets to smaller local and regional chains.
The value chain Borders maintained was entirely focused on the classical model of brick-and-mortar retailing and often failed to respond quickly enough to price and demand shifts in the market. The greatest challenge Borders faced was staying relevant as Amazon could offer a larger selection and a far greater level of responsiveness for hard-to-find books. Borders' supply chain could take 72 hours or longer for a hard-to-find book merely to reach the store. Amazon could locate it and have the book in the customer's hands within 48 hours or less. The specialty strength that Borders had built was quickly eroded as Amazon's logistics and supply chain capabilities gained momentum.
References
Cook, S. (2008, October). The contribution revolution: Letting volunteers build your business. Harvard Business Review, 86(10), 60–66.
Crosby, L., & Masland, J. (2009). Customer experience innovation. Marketing Management, 18(2), 10.
DataMonitor. (2010). Amazon.com, Inc. SWOT analysis (pp. 1–9).
Feigenbaum, J., Parkes, D., & Pennock, D. (2009). Computational challenges in e-commerce. Communications of the ACM, 52(1), 70.
Hall, W., & Gupta, A. (2010). Barnes & Noble, Inc.: Maintaining a competitive edge in an ever-changing industry. Journal of Business Case Studies, 6(4), 9–22.
Hausman, A., & Siekpe, J. (2009). The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 5.
Isckia, T. (2009). Amazon's evolving ecosystem: A cyber-bookstore and application service provider. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(4), 332–343.
Saranow, J. (2003, July 3). 'But Yahoo said I'd like you': Taking a page from Amazon, dating sites suggest partners. Wall Street Journal, p. D1.
Wang, H., Doong, H., & Foxall, G. (2010). Consumers' intentions to remain loyal to online reputation systems. Psychology & Marketing, 27(9), 887.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.