This essay argues that Arthur Dimmesdale, not Hester Prynne, commits the greatest sin in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. Through close reading of key passages, the paper examines how Dimmesdale's refusal to publicly confess his adultery, his willingness to let Hester bear the full social punishment alone, and his ultimate decision to die rather than live with the truth all reveal a deeply self-serving character. Rather than viewing Dimmesdale as a sympathetic penitent, the essay reframes him as a moral coward whose private guilt never translates into genuine accountability or sacrifice.
This essay demonstrates character-based literary analysis: the writer isolates specific behaviors (Dimmesdale's speech before Bellingham, his private ruminations, his deathbed confession, and his suicide) and reads each as evidence of a consistent moral pattern. Rather than accepting the narrator's sympathetic framing, the paper models how to argue against a conventional interpretation by recontextualizing the same textual evidence.
The essay follows a classical five-paragraph structure. The introduction states the thesis, three body paragraphs each address a distinct dimension of Dimmesdale's sin (his self-interest, his passive suffering, and his suicide), and the conclusion synthesizes the argument with a broader moral judgment. Each body paragraph introduces a counterargument before refuting it, which adds rhetorical balance to what is ultimately a prosecutorial reading of the character.
In Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel The Scarlet Letter, the person who commits the greatest sin is Arthur Dimmesdale. While he claims to suffer inwardly, he never chooses to own up to his responsibility or face the consequences of his actions. This failure is compounded by the fact that he allows Hester to suffer for years for a sin that both of them committed. In the end, Dimmesdale emerges as a weak coward who permits others to suffer in his place, and when he finally decides to come clean, he concludes that death is the only way out.
Dimmesdale demonstrates that he is more concerned with himself than with anyone else when he speaks before Bellingham, Wilson, and Chillingworth about letting Hester keep Pearl. On the surface, he appears to be performing a good deed by pleading on Hester's behalf, and his speech is filled with language that should convict him — yet he delivers it without so much as a stutter. For example, he has no difficulty asserting that Hester is a "poor, sinful woman" (Hawthorne 108) who should be allowed to keep Pearl, not because Pearl is her flesh and blood, but to "remind her, at every moment, of her fall — but yet to teach her" (108).
While one might argue that Dimmesdale is arguing for a good cause, it is clear that he could have done so without characterizing Hester as a person of diminished integrity. His willingness to demean her in this moment reveals the degree to which his concern for his own reputation overrides any genuine compassion for her. As Hawthorne's novel consistently suggests, Dimmesdale's outward piety and inner corruption exist in constant, unresolved tension.
Although Dimmesdale does appear to suffer for what has happened, that private suffering cannot be accepted as justice. When he becomes ill and reflects, "If Providence should see it fit to remove him, it would be because of his own unworthiness to perform his humblest mission on earth" (Hawthorne 113), these remain merely thoughts. It is easy to conclude that the man suffers because of his guilt — and that is arguably true — but one must also factor in the shame of allowing Hester and Pearl to bear the full burden of their shared sin. He never had to pay the kind of price that Hester paid.
Some may argue that the Puritanical society in which Dimmesdale lived caused him to behave as he did, but that is no excuse. One cannot look to circumstances as justification for doing wrong. Dimmesdale is not unlike a person raised in an abusive household who later harms others and claims his environment absolves him of responsibility. Puritan social codes were undeniably severe, but the moral demand for honesty transcends any particular cultural moment. Dimmesdale's failure is ultimately a failure of character, not merely a failure of circumstance.
Dimmesdale is often portrayed as a remorseful man who finally does the right thing and should therefore be forgiven. This is the wrong view because it allows him to escape accountability for his behavior. Instead, Dimmesdale should be seen for what he is: a deadbeat father by any modern measure. He committed the greatest sin not because he fell into temptation, but because he refused to own up to the truth. While he may have "suffered" while living a lie, he clearly did not suffer enough, given that he kept the secret for years while Hester endured daily public shame because of it.
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.