This paper examines Nathaniel Hawthorne's literary treatment of sin, guilt, and moral psychology across three major works: The Scarlet Letter, The Minister's Black Veil, and The Birthmark. Drawing on biographical context, including Hawthorne's Puritan ancestry and his ambivalent relationship with Salem's dark history, the paper analyzes how Hawthorne uses central symbols — the scarlet letter, the minister's black veil, and Georgiana's crimson birthmark — to explore the separation of intellect from soul, the nature of evil, and the social consequences of hidden transgression. Critical perspectives from scholars including N.S. Boone, Paul Emmett, and Mark Barna inform the discussion.
The paper effectively uses comparative literary analysis, reading multiple texts against each other to identify a unifying thematic and symbolic framework. Rather than treating each work in isolation, it shows how similar symbols — visible marks of imperfection or concealment — function across different narratives to make the same moral and psychological argument about sin, identity, and the separation of intellect from heart.
The paper opens with biographical context before moving into Hawthorne's broader thematic concerns. It then devotes substantial attention to critical debates around "The Minister's Black Veil," followed by analysis of "The Scarlet Letter" as the central work. A briefer comparative section on "The Birthmark" connects the symbolic pattern, and the conclusion situates Hawthorne's psychologized Puritanism within American literary history. This movement from biography to theme to individual works to synthesis is a reliable and effective organizational model.
Born in Salem, Massachusetts, Nathaniel Hawthorne (1804–1864) is considered one of the great masters of American fiction, with tales and novels that reflect deep explorations of moral and spiritual conflicts. He descended from a prominent Puritan family, and when he was fourteen years old, he and his widowed mother moved to a remote farm in Maine. Hawthorne attended Bowdoin College from 1821 to 1825, and afterwards devoted himself to writing, publishing his first novel in 1829. He attempted living at Brook Farm, a community experiment begun by a group of Transcendentalists, but was less than enthusiastic about what he saw as hypocrisy and excessive idealism.
In 1842, he married Sophia Peabody, a friend of Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, and they settled in Concord. To support his family, he took a job as surveyor of the port at Salem from 1846 to 1849, during which time he began writing his masterpiece, The Scarlet Letter, published in 1850. The novel is set in seventeenth-century Puritan New England and delves deeply into the human heart, presenting the problems of moral evil and guilt through allegory and symbolism. It is often considered the first American psychological novel. Hawthorne was equally celebrated as a short-story writer and is credited with helping to establish the American short story as a significant art form through his tales of loneliness, frustration, hypocrisy, eccentricity, and frailty. Among his stories considered most brilliant is "The Minister's Black Veil."
According to Mark Canada, English professor, Nathaniel Hawthorne authored some of the most respected fiction in American literature. American novelist Henry James once wrote, "The fine thing in Hawthorne is that he cared for the deeper psychology, and that, in his way, he tried to become familiar with it" (Canada pp). Hawthorne was especially interested in the nature of evil, perhaps leading Herman Melville, in his essay "Hawthorne and His Mosses," to write that half of Hawthorne is "shrouded in a blackness ten times black" (Canada pp). Moreover, Hawthorne had a fascination with religion, as demonstrated in many of his works including The Scarlet Letter and "The Minister's Black Veil." His studies of evil thus often coincide with his studies of religion, especially Puritanism, which was practiced by his ancestors in Salem during the seventeenth century.
Much like Melville and Edgar Allan Poe, Hawthorne made extensive use of symbols — such as the scarlet letter — and these symbols play important roles in all of his major short stories, including "The Birthmark." Moreover, his works tend to hint at the supernatural, the unreal, or the uncommon, and as he explains, the romance writer may "mingle the Marvellous" in his work (Canada pp). Canada points out that Hawthorne often used the "metaphor of everyday objects seen in moonlight to explain the material of the romance," such as in the essay "The Custom-House," which precedes The Scarlet Letter, in which the ordinary objects he sees there "are so spiritualized by the unusual light, that they seem to lose their actual substance, and become things of intellect" (Canada pp).
In fact, one of Hawthorne's main concerns is the separation of the head and heart — intellect and soul. He once wrote that an unpardonable sin is:
"a want of love and reverence for the Human Soul; in consequence of which, the investigator pried into its dark depths, not with a hope or purpose of making it better, but from a cold philosophical curiosity — content that it should be wicked in whatever kind or degree, and only desiring to study it out. Would not this, in other words, be the separation of the intellect from the heart" (Canada pp).
He explored these ideas extensively in several short stories, and they also helped to shape The Scarlet Letter.
In "The Minister's Black Veil," Hawthorne's protagonist, Reverend Hooper, is a young minister who, in the prime of his life and for reasons unknown, begins wearing a black veil over his face. At first, this behavior creates quite a stir in the village and speculation abounds, but as time passes his odd behavior becomes fairly accepted, though the curious always hope to gain a glimpse beneath the veil. Hawthorne writes that for all its bad influences, "the black veil had the one desirable effect, of making its wearer a very efficient clergyman" (Hawthorne3 pp). Hooper became a man of great power over sinful souls, and the veil seemed to enable him to "sympathize with all dark affections ... dying sinners cried aloud" for him and would not draw their last breath until he came, and as he "stooped to whisper consolation, they shuddered at the veiled face ... such were the terrors of the black veil, even when Death had bared his visage" (Hawthorne3 pp). Even on his deathbed, an old man by then, he refused to allow anyone to remove his veil, and so he was buried in it — "good Mr. Hooper's face is dust; but awful is still the thought that it mouldered beneath the Black Veil" (Hawthorne3 pp).
N.S. Boone writes in the March 22, 2005 issue of Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature that "The Minister's Black Veil" is perhaps Hawthorne's most "enigmatic tale." The majority of criticism focuses on interpreting the meaning of the veil and the character of Hooper. Samuel Coale summarizes this criticism, noting that Hooper has been regarded as "sinful, almost demonic, faithless, proud, sacrilegious, preoccupied with evil, a misguided religious zealot, a rigid Calvinist, an arch villain, a man afraid of women, a selfish soul fleeing from the darkness of sexuality, and a living parable who dooms himself to isolation and despair. The veil, on the other hand, has suggested a symbol for mortal ignorance, a false signum diaboli, a demonic object whose effects on the townspeople are such that its very presence vindicates Hooper's behavior" (Boone pp).
J. Hillis Miller claims that the veil is actually impenetrable, and that the story is simply an allegory of the reading of the story itself, wherein the reader can only come to the knowledge that full disclosure is an impossibility: "the face itself is already an impenetrable veil ... A veiled face is a veil over a veil, a veiling of what is already veiled" (Boone pp). Hawthorne once wrote that masks are harmful but veils may be necessary, and Clark Davis accordingly argues that Hooper's veil is a mask and completely opaque to interpreters. Davis suggests that the veil is an emblem signifying Hawthorne's authorial ethics, keeping a necessary distance between himself and others (Boone pp).
One of the most famous theories is Edgar Allan Poe's assertion of "a crime of dark dye" in this story, leading critics to consider the veil as a symbol of ambiguity — a symbol of symbolism and signification itself. Theories abound concerning the meaning of the veil. Frederick Crews finds "an obviously sexual scandal," while Nicholas Canaday maintains that "Hawthorne is not stressing secret sin ... especially sexual sin" (Emmett pp). Richard Fogle summarizes: "Hawthorne holds out the suggestion that the veil is a penance for an actual and serious crime, while at the same time permitting no real grounds for it" (Emmett pp). Paul Emmett notes that the narrator is very much like the "highly respectable witnesses" to the revelation of Dimmesdale's scarlet letter, whose suppressive denial of the entire incident is exposed by the narrator of The Scarlet Letter in language that "should make us suspicious" (Emmett pp).
The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne's most famous literary work, begins with the discovery of a "mysterious package" containing "a certain affair of fine red cloth, much worn and faded. There were traces about it of gold embroidery, which, however, was greatly frayed and defaced, so that none, or very little, of the glitter was left" (Hawthorne2 pp). The narrator goes on to describe the "skill of needlework" and how it "gives evidence of a now forgotten art, not to be discovered even by the process of picking out the threads" (Hawthorne2 pp). The piece of scarlet cloth "assumed the shape of ... The capital letter A," signifying to the narrator that it was "an ornamental article of dress ... To be worn" perhaps as a mark of "honour and dignity, in by-past times" (Hawthorne2 pp).
The novel, set in the seventeenth-century Puritan settlement of Boston, is the story of Hester Prynne, a woman who has borne a child, Pearl, out of wedlock and is shunned by the community and forced to wear the scarlet "A" on her breast as punishment. A young minister, Arthur Dimmesdale, is in truth Pearl's father, but does not reveal this fact to the community until right before his death. It was then that "spectators testified to having seen, on the breast of the unhappy minister, a scarlet letter — the very semblance of that worn by Hester Prynne — imprinted in the flesh" (Hawthorne2 pp).
Hester and Pearl moved from the village, but many years later it was discovered that Hester had returned "and taken up her long-forsaken shame." Through the remainder of her life "there were indications that the recluse of the scarlet letter was the object of love and interest with some inhabitant of another land" (Hawthorne2 pp). The narrator explains: "Here had been her sin; here, her sorrow; and here was yet to be her penitence. She had returned, therefore, and resumed of her own free will ... resumed the symbol of which we have related so dark a tale" (Hawthorne2 pp). Hester continued to wear the letter throughout her life, and through the years it "ceased to be a stigma which attracted the world's scorn and bitterness, and became a type of something to be sorrowed over, and looked upon with awe, yet with reverence too" (Hawthorne2 pp).
Like the black veil of the minister, Hester's scarlet letter had become her identity, and so she wore it freely in the same manner as Hooper wore his veil, for "what mortal might not do the same" (Hawthorne3 pp). Many scholars view The Scarlet Letter as a resurrection story, turning Dimmesdale into a Christ-like figure because while on the scaffold he confesses his affair, and thus "the minister's redemption in the eyes of God is complete" (Barna pp). It could also be said, however, that Hester herself undergoes a resurrection — hence her return to the village and her accepted place within the community (Barna pp).
In Hawthorne's short story "The Birthmark," Georgiana's crimson cheek mark is also her identity, and like the scarlet letter that Hester wore, its removal was the basis of "male domination versus female subordination" (Meyers pp). When Aylmer asks if she has ever thought of having the mark removed, Georgiana answers, "To tell you the truth it has been so often called a charm that I was simple enough to imagine it might be so," but for Aylmer it was "the visible mark of earthly imperfection" (Hawthorne1 pp). Although the story reflects society's concern about the "role of science in humans' lives," it also reflects the "crucial issues of gender identity and roles at personal and social levels" (Meyers pp).
You’re 77% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.