This paper examines how Nathaniel Hawthorne's "moonlight theory," introduced in "The Custom House" preface to The Scarlet Letter, functions as a narrative framework for humanizing the novel's three central characters. By illuminating dual facets of each character's personality, the theory moves Hester Prynne beyond the role of the branded adulteress, Arthur Dimmesdale beyond that of the hypocritical clergyman, and Roger Chillingworth beyond that of the purely vengeful husband. The paper argues that Hawthorne's romance theory allows readers to perceive each character's inner vulnerability alongside their public persona, deepening the novel's exploration of sin, hypocrisy, and Puritan social rigidity.
One of the most common yet enduringly controversial depictions of human experience in literature is the illustration of human weakness and suffering, whatever form these may take. It is through such illustration that readers are able to give relevance to the story unfolding before them, gauging through their own inner lives the severity of a character's actions compared to their own.
This is precisely the experience that American Romance novelist Nathaniel Hawthorne wanted readers to feel when he created The Scarlet Letter. In this classic romance novel, Hawthorne delved into the issues of sinfulness, hypocrisy, and the rigidity of Puritanical laws in American society. By centering on these themes, the novelist raised awareness of the widespread yet unacknowledged existence of hypocrisy within a society that considered itself religious and righteous in both character and conduct.
In focusing on human weakness and suffering, Hawthorne introduced the "moonlight theory" as one of the governing frameworks that helped him develop the novel's main characters: Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, and Roger Chillingworth. The basis of the moonlight theory is explicated in the novel's introductory section, "The Custom House," where Hawthorne shares his motives for creating his romance theory and applies it to the characters and events of the novel.
Hawthorne elucidated on the usefulness of the moonlight theory for understanding the characterization of Hester, Arthur, and Roger. He wrote:
If the imaginative faculty refused to act at such an hour, it might well be deemed a hopeless case. Moonlight, in a familiar room, falling so white upon the carpet, and showing all its figures so distinctly — making every object so minutely visible, yet so unlike a morning or noontide visibility — is a medium the most suitable for a romance-writer to get acquainted with his illusive guests.
The moonlight theory, in effect, acts as a "medium" through which Hawthorne can best reveal different facets of a character's personality. With the aid of the moonlight, as the novelist explained, characters can be analyzed and understood from multiple perspectives through which their characterization is depicted.
The analysis in this paper is applied in the context of the moonlight theory. Using this framework, Hawthorne was able to bring greater depth to each main character, giving them two facets from which readers can interpret their actions and behavior. This paper posits that the romance theory Hawthorne conceptualized allowed him to inject a "humanist" dimension into the otherwise stereotypical characterizations of Hester as the branded woman, Arthur as the guilty clergyman, and Roger as the vengeful husband. The moonlight theory invites readers to see Hester as a youthful, innocent woman driven to sin by passion; Arthur as a simple human being pressured into becoming a model individual by his clerical status; and Roger as an obscure figure who rises to prominence in order to avenge the injustice committed against his former wife.
The moonlight theory as applied to Hester's character creates a dual perception of her personality. Generally, Hawthorne characterizes her as a strong and principled woman who, in the face of great embarrassment and emotional torment inflicted by her community, remained resolute in her refusal to divulge the identity of her daughter's father. In this sense, Hester is a woman capable of surmounting emotional torment and social isolation — a burden her society has mandated she carry for life, signified by the scarlet letter "A" branded upon her.
Illuminated by Hawthorne's moonlight theory, however, Hester is also "humanized" and revealed as a helpless individual despite the strength she displayed during the public exhibition of her adultery. As she was being showcased to the townspeople as a sinner, Hester was characterized as retreating into pure memories of her earlier years — a time before life had become so Puritanical:
Yet there were intervals when the whole scene, in which she was the most conspicuous object, seemed to vanish from her eyes, or, at least, glimmered indistinctly before them, like a mass of imperfectly shaped and spectral images. Her mind, and especially her memory, was preternaturally active, and kept bringing up other scenes than this roughly hewn street of a little town, on the edge of the western wilderness: other faces than were lowering upon her from beneath the brims of those steeple-crowned hats. Reminiscences, the most trifling and immaterial, passages of infancy and school-days, sports, childish quarrels, and the little domestic traits of her maiden years, came swarming back upon her, intermingled with recollections of whatever was gravest in her subsequent life; one picture precisely as vivid as another; as if all were of similar importance, or all alike a play.
"Dimmesdale's public piety contrasted with private guilt"
"Chillingworth balances revenge with surprising moral fairness"
Illuminating two facets of Roger's character created greater meaning in his portrayal and added depth to the interpretation of The Scarlet Letter as a romance novel. In each case — Hester, Arthur, and Roger — Hawthorne's moonlight theory allowed readers to look beyond the surface stereotype and encounter a fully realized human being shaped by passion, fear, guilt, and a complicated sense of justice. The theory, as Hawthorne articulated it in "The Custom House," proved to be far more than a stylistic device; it was the humanist heart of the novel itself, ensuring that no character could be reduced to a simple moral symbol in a Puritanical parable.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.