This paper examines The Walt Disney Company's 2016 decision to discontinue its self-publishing video game division, Disney Interactive Studios, which employed approximately 300 people. Drawing on public statements from CEO Robert Iger and financial reporting, the paper explores the strategic rationale behind the closure, including the $150 million charge taken in the quarter, the underperformance of earnings relative to projections, and the inherent risks of maintaining an internal game development team. The analysis situates the decision within Disney's broader diversification strategy and its core competency in brand licensing, arguing that the company is likely to continue monetizing its characters through external licensing partnerships rather than in-house publishing.
The paper demonstrates close reading of a primary source (the CEO's earnings call statement) as an analytical tool. Rather than simply summarizing what Iger said, the author isolates a single phrase and unpacks its strategic significance, connecting it to broader concepts like internal resource allocation, risk management, and core competency theory.
The paper opens by establishing Disney's strategic mission and product mix, then introduces the specific event (studio closure) as a case study. A financial overview provides context for the decision, followed by close analysis of the CEO's public statement. The paper concludes by projecting the likely strategic pivot toward external licensing. This intro-context-evidence-analysis-conclusion flow is well suited to a short business strategy essay at the undergraduate level.
Disney's primary strategic objective is to produce high-quality content across its entire product mix, which consists of a wide variety of goods, services, and media products. The Walt Disney Company mission statement reads as follows:
"The mission of The Walt Disney Company is to be one of the world's leading producers and providers of entertainment and information. Using our portfolio of brands to differentiate our content, services and consumer products, we seek to develop the most creative, innovative and profitable entertainment experiences and related products in the world (The Walt Disney Company, n.d.)."
Disney recently made the decision to cut its video gaming segment, referred to as Disney Interactive Studios, which was staffed by roughly three hundred employees. This move surprised observers, particularly given that the company had publicly boasted about the success of its self-published video game unit and the market gains it was making merely weeks earlier (Morris, 2016).
Since Disney is typically adamant about pursuing growth through a diversification strategy that leverages its famous characters across as many product lines as possible, the news surprised many analysts. The announcement was coupled with a nearly $150 million charge for the quarter, despite the fact that the division housing Disney Infinity, Disney Consumer Products, and Interactive Media still posted an operating income of over $350 million (Barnes, 2016). The resulting announcement was followed by a fall in Disney's stock price of approximately six percent. There is evidence that earnings produced by the video game division fell sharply below projected figures for the quarter, making the division subject to review.
Robert Iger, Disney's chairman and CEO, addressed the closure directly on an earnings call:
"That business is a changing business, and we did not have enough confidence in the business in terms of it being stable enough to stay in it from a self-publishing perspective. We knew going in that there would be a lot of risk with this product, and the fact that we did so well initially gave us the confidence to continue with it. The truth of the matter is that the risk that we cited at the beginning when we went into this caught up with us (Morris, 2016)."
One phrase in Iger's statement is particularly revealing regarding the company's perspective and intentions: his reference to staying in the industry "from a self-publishing perspective." Producing games internally — with a dedicated team developing software and managing related business functions — is expensive in terms of human resources and capital allocation. The CEO's words indicate that he was not comfortable continuing to fund these operations internally. However, it is unlikely that Disney characters will disappear from the video game segment entirely in the future.
Disney seems to be highly skilled in its core business of creating animations, and equally skilled in licensing the brands it creates to the fullest extent possible. The closure of Disney Interactive Studios reflects a rational realignment with these core competencies, prioritizing stable, asset-light licensing arrangements over the financial volatility of self-published game development.
Barnes, B. (2016, May 10). Disney, With Mixed Earnings, Is Shutting Video Game Line. The New York Times.
Morris, C. (2016, May 10). Why Disney Unexpectedly Quit Video Game Publishing. CNBC.
The Walt Disney Company. (n.d.). News. Retrieved from The Walt Disney Company.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.