This essay examines the characteristics of Transcendental thought visible in Walt Whitman's poetry by comparing his work to Ralph Waldo Emerson's foundational essay "Self-Reliance." While Whitman shares Emerson's celebration of individualism, disdain for convention, and reverence for nature, the essay argues that Whitman's Transcendentalism is distinctly democratic and more willing to embrace ambivalence and darkness. Drawing on poems including "One's-Self I Sing," "When I Heard the Learn'd Astronomer," "To a Locomotive in Winter," and "The Dalliance of Eagles," the paper traces both the debt Whitman owes to Emerson and the ways his collective, paradox-embracing vision departs from Emerson's more purely individualist philosophy.
The paper demonstrates comparative literary analysis: it uses close reading of individual lines and images to support a thesis about intellectual influence and divergence. Rather than simply listing parallels, the writer shows how specific textual details — such as Whitman's use of "One's Self" rather than "I" — carry philosophical weight, turning quotation into evidence.
The essay follows an inductive structure: it begins with one focused example (the opening line of "One's-Self I Sing"), then broadens outward through additional poems to develop a cumulative portrait of Whitman's brand of Transcendentalism. Each poem adds a new dimension — democracy, anti-intellectualism, industrial ambivalence, and human darkness — before a brief conclusion synthesizes the contrast with Emerson.
"One's Self I sing, a simple separate person" is the first line of Walt Whitman's poem celebrating, or so it seems, the type of individualism advocated in Ralph Waldo Emerson's Transcendentalist essay "Self-Reliance." As a poet, Whitman embodied and exhibited the ideals of "Self-Reliance" in that he disdained conventional traditions and metrical constructions, and attempted to be true to his own voice and vision. But Whitman's ideal was not a selfish ideal that denied the responsibility of the citizen to the larger collective whole of America. Whitman was also more willing than Emerson to embrace the complete picture of the human spirit provided by nature — the negative as well as the positive.
Even the complex construction of the first, apparently self-reliant phrase of the poem demonstrates Whitman's different brand of Transcendentalism. Whitman does not say that he loves himself as a poet. Instead, he speaks of "one's self" in the abstract — a self that embodies and represents all human beings, or at least all Americans. The second line of the poem reads: "Yet utter the word Democratic, the word En-Masse." Whitman, like Emerson, celebrates the unique possibilities provided by America to create a new culture and spirit. This is consistent with the Transcendentalist belief that the spirits of the present spoke more to the needs of America than the spirits of the past.
However, Whitman's philosophy espoused a kind of collective individualism, not just the universal individualism of the poet found in Emerson's writings. Whitman's poet embodied the whole: "The Female equally with the Male I sing." The ideal, for Whitman, was the "Modern Man" who was many ordinary American men, not just the best nonconformist — the Socrates or the Galileo.
As a poet, Whitman was always aware that paradox is part of human life. Not even nature was perfect. Nature could be terrible, wild, and wonderful — unlike the quieter pastoral celebrated in Emerson's writings. Human beings, like natural beings, could be sexual and vital as eagles: "The rushing amorous contact high in space together, / The clinching interlocking claws, a living, fierce, gyrating wheel." In "The Dalliance of Eagles," Whitman marvels at how love and hate can be embodied in a single creature. Although nature is inspiring, it is not inviting. The poet may see his own animal nature reflected in the behavior of the eagles — as he does in the locomotive, the stars, and the American Man — but unlike Emerson, Whitman is more willing to embrace the darkness of human nature as well as the light, and to acknowledge that human beings and natural beings alike need to be part of something, whether it is America or simply the company of another of the same species.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.