This paper examines key aspects of employee selection in U.S. organizations, covering the impact of unemployment and economic recession on hiring decisions, the legal and practical requirements for valid and reliable selection methods, and the advantages of structured over unstructured interviews. It also addresses common interviewer errors, paper-and-pencil honesty tests, conscientiousness as a hiring factor, assessment center preparation, drug testing practices, the Employee Polygraph Protection Act, and physical examination requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Together, these topics provide a broad overview of legally compliant and effective employee selection practices.
High unemployment and economic recession in the United States both have strong effects on the selection decisions of companies. Companies want to secure the most qualified candidate available, and when unemployment numbers are high, more people apply for each open position. During a recession, however, hiring can become more difficult because the financial resources needed to bring on additional employees may simply not be available. Understanding how these economic forces shape hiring priorities is an important starting point for any discussion of employee selection practices.
Selection methods must be both valid and reliable. If they are not, they risk being illegal and potentially violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or other employment laws. Non-compliant selection practices can expose companies to serious consequences, including fines, lawsuits, and reputational damage. It is therefore essential that organizations select and hire employees based only on characteristics that are legal, reliable, and valid.
Structured interviews are superior to unstructured interviews because they follow a consistent format that can be applied to every candidate. The questions asked are the same for each applicant, reducing the risk that an interviewer will forget to address important topics. A standardized format also allows interviewers to compare candidates more accurately based on their responses to identical questions.
Interviewers, however, can and do commit errors that create significant problems. For example, an interviewer may ask a candidate an illegal question — sometimes simply out of ignorance of its illegality — and that candidate may subsequently file a complaint. Such errors can expose an organization to legal liability and damage the integrity of the hiring process. Proper interviewer training is therefore a critical component of any sound selection program.
The two types of paper-and-pencil honesty tests are personality-based and overt. These tests are designed to gauge whether a candidate is likely to remain in the job and whether he or she will be honest with the employer. Research has shown that honesty tests can save companies a significant amount of money, and their use is generally recommended for organizations that want to screen prospective employees effectively.
Conscientiousness is another important factor in the selection process. People who are conscientious pay attention to details and take care in their work, which makes them more effective employees in a number of ways. When employees genuinely care about their own performance and about the success of the organization, they tend to work harder, act more honestly, and invest greater effort in their responsibilities. These qualities can help individuals both secure and retain employment, while also benefiting the organizations they work for by strengthening their competitive position.
"Preparing for assessments, drug testing policies, and EPPA overview"
"ADA rules governing pre-employment physical examinations"
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.