Implementing an Enterprise Database Management System
This paper examines the implementation of Enterprise Database Management Systems (DBMS) and their central role in modern enterprise computing. It analyzes the critical success factors necessary for successful DBMS deployment—including executive sponsorship, user participation, and measurable performance goals—drawing parallels to Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementations. The paper also evaluates the primary advantages of enterprise DBMS platforms, such as reduced data redundancy, improved data integrity, and lower Total Cost of Ownership, while acknowledging significant disadvantages including high training costs, vendor licensing expenses, and data migration challenges from legacy systems.
- Introduction: Defines DBMS role in enterprise computing
- Critical Success Factors for DBMS Implementation: Executive buy-in, participation, and measurable goals
- Sustaining a Successful DBMS Implementation: Ongoing tuning, integration testing, and shared vision
- Advantages of Enterprise DBMS Systems: Reduced redundancy, data integrity, lower TCO
- Disadvantages of Enterprise DBMS Systems: Training costs, licensing fees, and migration expenses
- Conclusion: DBMS platforms persist despite cost challenges
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly organizes the discussion around two defined analytical tasks — critical success factors and advantages/disadvantages — giving the paper a logical, easy-to-follow structure.
- Grounds abstract concepts (such as change management resistance) in a concrete example, namely CRM and master data management integration, which makes the argument more tangible.
- Maintains a balanced analytical tone by acknowledging both strengths and weaknesses of enterprise DBMS platforms rather than presenting a one-sided assessment.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses comparative framing — drawing explicit parallels between DBMS implementation challenges and the well-documented ERP critical success factors literature — to borrow credibility from a related body of research and apply it to a newer context. This technique allows the author to build an argument efficiently without having to establish every premise from scratch.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction that defines the scope and purpose. The body is divided into two substantive sections: the first addresses implementation critical success factors (with two paragraphs covering initial factors and ongoing management), and the second addresses advantages and disadvantages in a balanced compare-and-contrast format. A references section closes the paper. The structure is compact and well-suited to an undergraduate survey paper.
Introduction
Enterprise Database Management Systems (DBMS) are the catalyst and foundation of many enterprise software applications, platforms, and systems in use today. Having progressed from serving as simple relational databases to functioning as the foundation for complex process workflow and transaction systems (Casati, Castano, & Fugini, 2001), the DBMS architecture has taken on a central role in enterprise computing. This paper analyzes the critical success factors for DBMS implementation in enterprises, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of enterprise DBMS systems and platforms.
References
Casati, F., Castano, S., & Fugini, M. (2001). Managing workflow authorization constraints through active database technology. Information Systems Frontiers: Special Issue on Workflow, 3(3), 319.
Gouldson, T. (2001, January). CRM drives need for bigger, better data warehouse. Computing Canada, 27(1), 15.
Lungu, I., Velicanu, M., & Botha, I. (2009). Database systems — present and future. Informatica Economica, 13(1), 84–99.
Mercioiu, N., & Vladucu, V. (2010). Improving SQL server performance. Informatica Economica, 14(2), 55–60.
Remus, U. (2007). Critical success factors for implementing enterprise portals: A comparison with ERP implementations. Business Process Management Journal, 13(4), 538–552.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.