This paper examines foundational strategies for developing a personal philosophy of environmental education, drawing on four key texts: Mitchell Thomashow's Ecological Identity, the Johnson and Mappin collection on environmental advocacy, Basile et al.'s Awareness to Citizenship, and C.A. Bowers's Educating for an Ecologically Sustainable Culture. The paper addresses the dual burden facing environmental educators — conveying wonder while warning of ecological crisis — and explores themes of ecological healing, psychospiritual awareness, the risks of misinformation and advocacy bias, age-appropriate nature literacy, inclusive education, and the urgent global call for cultural transformation in environmental stewardship.
The paper effectively employs multi-source synthesis: rather than treating each book as a separate topic, the author weaves quotations and arguments from four different texts into a single, escalating argument. Each source adds a new dimension — healing, advocacy bias, elementary literacy, and global urgency — building toward a unified conclusion about why environmental education philosophy matters.
The paper opens with Thomashow's concept of ecological identity and healing, then pivots to the risks of advocacy-driven misinformation, followed by practical classroom strategies for elementary students, a brief note on inclusive education, and a dramatic closing argument grounded in a UN-addressed scientific statement. The Works Cited section follows standard MLA formatting.
Approaching research on environmental education strategies through Mitchell Thomashow's book Ecological Identity: Becoming a Reflective Environmentalist, one learns that "ecological identity work represents a process of personal and global healing" (Thomashow xvii). Those who work in the environment and for the environment, the author writes, "carry a profound dual burden: how can they at once convey a sense of wonder and appreciation about the natural world, and also be the harbingers of impending doom, warning the world about ecological catastrophes?"
Taking the "healing" concept a bit further, Thomashow provides food for thought for those seeking to develop a personal philosophy of environmental education. The healing he speaks of occurs in a variety of situations: (a) whenever an environmental technician "cleans a toxic waste site"; (b) when an environmental educator "explains the causes and consequences of an oil spill"; and (c) "when an environmental scientist restores a wetland" (Thomashow 143). All of these examples — and many more — provide healing for the earth, for the community, and for the person engaged in the environmental activity. The concept of healing the earth in a global sense is not wildly out of reach when one realizes that putting fewer greenhouse gases into the atmosphere — something everyone can help with — has a global impact.
All healing activities carry a psychological impact as well as a practical one. Thomashow writes (142) that "surprisingly few environmental practitioners" consider the "psychospiritual ramifications" of internalizing "global environmental change," but that in fact this dynamic is "crucial to ecological identity work." The reason these practitioners do not give consideration to the "psychospiritual" aspect of their work is that they are "busy attending to the practical work" of advocating for ecological reform, promoting "a worldview," or simply getting the word out that certain social behaviors are good for the earth — and others are most certainly bad for it.
In the book Environmental Education and Advocacy: Changing Perspectives of Ecology and Education, the authors point out that among the major challenges facing environmental education today is "the growing public attention and concern that education has become blurred with advocacy," and that some of the environmental content in environmental education "is no longer based on sound frameworks of natural and social sciences" (Mappin et al. 1).
The authors also note — and this is valuable information for those in the process of developing a personal philosophy of environmental education — that the Independent Commission on Environmental Education (ICCEE) published an important white paper in 1997, "Building Environmental Literacy for the Next Century," which pointed out, among other things, that "environmental education was needlessly controversial" and that too many "factual errors" were commonplace in teacher resources (Mappin 6). Another research paper, "Facts, Not Fear," mentioned by the authors, "questioned environmental education resources for misuse of facts and for scaring children with misinformation" (Mappin 6).
There is an abundant amount of misinformation on the anti-environment side of the ledger as well. In creating a personal philosophy of education, it behooves all environmentally minded citizens — especially those in leadership positions — to present honest, believable facts.
If a teacher uses the book Awareness to Citizenship: Environmental Literacy for the Elementary Child and applies it fully in developing a teaching philosophy, a child will never be frightened, because the information is down-to-earth, well-presented, and family-friendly. The authors insist that teachers need not "know everything or be able to identify everything," but they should explore environmental issues with their students and "always be thinking about how they might encourage students by introducing nature-related materials, nature-related themes and concepts, [and] student-centered activities" (Basile et al. 20).
A sound philosophy to develop is that nature is always all around us. Basile encourages students to observe and make journal entries about what they "see and hear in the schoolyard" (21). This engenders a sense that the environment is not some vague place "out there," but rather that conservation and ecology are right here in the schoolyard.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.