This paper examines four core dimensions of professional nursing practice. It addresses how nurses can locate and apply evidence-based literature and guidelines to improve patient care, why sharing relevant practice changes with colleagues strengthens teamwork and workplace efficiency, how nurses must recognize that clinical judgments and decisions are unavoidable and consequential aspects of their role, and why understanding that nursing expertise varies with education, experience, and context is essential for effective delegation and collegial collaboration. Drawing on Apker et al. (2006), Benner et al. (2009), and Husted and Husted (2008), the paper argues that informed, communicative, and mutually aware nursing teams are better positioned to achieve positive patient outcomes.
Nurses can and should use the best available evidence to provide optimal patient care. A wide range of literature, studies, and guidelines exists across nursing specialties and is readily accessible to practitioners (Apker, 2006). This accessibility means nurses can stay current with the latest research in their field. Nurses should examine and analyze all information they study thoroughly, ensuring each subject is sufficiently understood, and then apply that learning to practice as effectively as possible (Apker, 2006).
Participating in reviews of policies, procedures, and guidelines is another valuable way for nurses to maintain and improve their practice (Husted, 2008). Such reviews allow nurses to revisit pertinent information they may have missed or forgotten. Research on evidence-based nursing consistently shows that when nurses engage with relevant literature and guidelines, their overall performance improves and patient health outcomes improve alongside it (Apker, 2006).
Nursing is fundamentally a team-based profession, making collegial relationships essential to effective care. Because of this, it is vital that nurses inform one another of pertinent changes in practice or newly instituted guidelines (Apker, 2006). Keeping colleagues informed creates a more cohesive work environment in which everyone understands what is expected of them (Husted, 2008). Fewer interruptions and errors will occur throughout a shift when nurses share newly recommended or instituted information with their coworkers, allowing the workplace to function more effectively as a whole (Apker, 2006). The positive outcomes that result from this kind of open communication explain why high value is placed on nurses disseminating relevant changes to their colleagues.
Making judgments and decisions is rarely comfortable, yet in nursing these acts are both necessary and unavoidable. Nurses frequently face the difficult reality that their judgments or decisions may directly affect whether a patient lives or dies, which can be deeply difficult to process (Husted, 2008). Even when a nurse makes the correct decision and a patient dies regardless, the experience can be haunting, because the loss occurred under that nurse's care (Husted, 2008). For this reason, nurses must recognize that consequential — and sometimes frightening — judgments and decisions are essential aspects of nursing care rather than exceptional burdens (Benner, 2009).
Clinical decision-making frameworks can help nurses prepare for these moments by providing structured approaches to ethical and practical dilemmas they will inevitably encounter.
Nurses should recognize that expertise varies from person to person because of differences in education, experience, and context of practice. This awareness is important for several reasons. First, it helps nurses better understand their colleagues (Husted, 2008). For example, a nurse who received a more comprehensive education may be more patient and understanding when a colleague underperforms or appears hesitant, recognizing that the difference may stem from educational background rather than effort or ability (Husted, 2008). When nurses understand that performance differences can arise from varying circumstances, conflicts between colleagues become less likely (Benner, 2009).
Recognizing differences in expertise is also critical for effective delegation. Delegation is a significant responsibility because so much depends on the delegating nurse making sound decisions about task assignment (Benner, 2009). Understanding a colleague's educational background and the factors that shaped their level of expertise can make those decisions considerably easier (Husted, 2008). When a delegating nurse is informed about a colleague's preparation and background, they can assign responsibilities with greater confidence and accuracy than if they lacked that knowledge (Husted, 2008).
Acknowledging that colleagues may approach a task or problem differently is equally important (Husted, 2008). This awareness prevents nurses from being alarmed when a coworker uses a slightly different technique during patient care (Apker, 2006). While nurses should always verify that procedures remain within accepted clinical parameters and nursing guidelines, minor variations in technique are normal and should not be a source of concern (Benner, 2009). The shared goal is a consistently high standard of care, even if each nurse reaches that standard in their own way (Benner, 2009).
Understanding why colleagues' expertise and techniques differ is widely regarded as a mark of professional maturity (Husted, 2008). This understanding helps build a well-rounded, accepting staff that communicates and collaborates effectively — qualities that research on team dynamics consistently links to stronger organizational performance (Husted, 2008). Nurses who appreciate the diverse routes their colleagues took to reach the profession are better positioned to work alongside them productively and respectfully.
Nurses who engage with current evidence, communicate openly with colleagues, accept the weight of clinical judgment, and appreciate variation in expertise are better equipped to provide optimal patient care. Each of these competencies reinforces the others: an evidence-informed nurse who communicates well, delegates wisely, and understands her colleagues' backgrounds contributes to a stronger, safer care environment for patients and staff alike.
You’re 88% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.