This paper examines the costume design decisions made by Janty Yates for the 2014 film Exodus: Gods and Kings. The analysis explores how the designer navigated the challenge of recreating biblical-era clothing while managing audience expectations shaped by religious beliefs and previous film depictions. The paper discusses specific design choices—including lamellar armor for Egyptian soldiers, gold accoutrements for the Pharaoh, and contrasting garments for Israelites and Moses—and how these choices serve both historical inspiration and narrative purposes. The paper evaluates the tension between historical authenticity and the practical demands of filmmaking, including actor mobility and visual character distinction.
Recreating historical costumes from past eras is always challenging; it becomes even more so when designing for biblical times, given the religious significance attached to that period. Audiences viewing the film bring strong, established expectations shaped by personal beliefs and numerous previous depictions of biblical characters. For costume designers, the task becomes especially daunting when the designs must recreate images that have become iconic in previous films and visual traditions.
Exodus: Gods and Kings (2014), which details the story of Moses and his efforts to free the Israelites from slavery in Egypt, presented costume designer Janty Yates with exactly this challenge. In an interview with the L.A. Times, Yates explained how he approached the design process by drawing upon actual historical depictions of clothing from the era. The designer noted that "all the Egyptians [in the film] wear lamellar armor, which has this petal-shaped metal that's even more elaborate than chain mail" (Rottenberg, 2014). Regarding the historical Ramses, Yates observed: "He was so vain, he had 70-foot statues built of himself—and not just one or two, like 40 or 50" (Rottenberg, 2014). These details illustrate how research into historical figures informed the visual choices made in the film.
The Pharaoh's armor exemplifies how design serves both historical inspiration and characterization. The designer chose gold for the Pharaoh's armor to indicate his elevated status, but also to reflect his vanity. The gold armor, with its pristine appearance, was intended to highlight the character of the Pharaoh rather than simply recreate the past with strict historical accuracy. Extant statues of Pharaoh provided guides for the designers, but these historical references were blended with the dramatic needs posed by the film's script.
The visual composition of many scenes in Exodus: Gods and Kings appears inspired by hieroglyphic layouts, with influences from earlier biblical epics such as The Ten Commandments and Ben-Hur. This aesthetic choice reflects a deliberate approach to visual storytelling that extends beyond costume into the entire frame.
The costume choices for different groups of characters reinforce their social positions and roles. All Egyptians are dressed in elaborate metallic costumes throughout the film in a manner that conveys wealth, coldness, and their superior status. In contrast, the Israelites are dressed far more humbly in roughly-woven robes and burlap. This visual distinction immediately communicates the power hierarchy and social divisions that form the core conflict of the narrative.
Moses occupies a unique position in this visual hierarchy. According to Yates's interview, Moses still wears an elaborate breastplate during fighting scenes, given that he was raised in the royal family and retained the armor he wore as a palace defender. This costume choice conveys his special status and his former role as a soldier of the Pharaoh, even as he leads an army of enslaved, poorly equipped people. The designer's reasoning demonstrates how costume functions as character exposition, communicating backstory and internal conflict through visual means. The contrast between Moses's appearance and that of Ramses is also crucial—it distinguishes him ethnically and as a character from the Pharaoh. Since the story centers on the struggle for power and personal animosity between two men, the visual distinction between these characters becomes especially important to the film's dramatic impact.
"How costume creates visual contrast and hierarchy"
"Trade-offs between historical accuracy and film requirements"
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.