This paper offers a comparative reading of two Robert Frost poems, "Mowing" and "Mending Wall," examining how each celebrates honest labor while arriving at very different emotional outcomes. The analysis explores the narrators' contrasting personalities — one absorbed in purposeful work, the other troubled by an unwanted social obligation — and considers the wall as a metaphor for human division. Themes of land, humor, introspection, and the relationship between labor and satisfaction are traced through close reading of Frost's language and imagery, revealing how the two poems illuminate complementary but divergent aspects of rural life and human connection.
This paper demonstrates effective use of comparative close reading. Rather than analyzing each poem in isolation, the writer moves fluidly between the two texts, using contrasts in tone, narrator personality, and outcome to build a cumulative argument. Repeated return to the same thematic anchor (honest labor) across multiple paragraphs creates analytical coherence.
The paper opens with a thesis previewing both similarity and difference, then develops the argument through character analysis, tonal contrast, and symbolic interpretation of the wall as metaphor. A late paragraph broadens into a "universal everyman" reading of the narrator in "Mending Wall" before the conclusion restates and confirms the thesis. The structure is linear and thesis-driven, appropriate for a comparative literary essay at the undergraduate introductory level.
This paper presents a comparative analysis of two poems by Robert Frost — "Mowing" and "Mending Wall" — establishing points of similarity and difference between the two works. Both poems celebrate the joy of honest labor, but with very different results. In "Mowing," the narrator is satisfied by his labor; in "Mending Wall," he is not.
The narrator in "Mending Wall" never names himself, but he does not need to — the lines of the poem reveal him clearly as they develop. He is a gentle man who does not really need the fence to show what land is his and what belongs to his neighbor. As he puts it: "Before I built a wall I'd ask to know / What I was walling in or walling out, / And to whom I was like to give offence" (Frost). Frost underscores his kindness by the way the narrator speaks of the hunters — as if he is not among them — and notes that they please their dogs at the expense of the rabbits they chase (Frost).
From the very beginning of the poem, the narrator makes clear that he does not enjoy having the wall and sees no need for it. He even suggests that nature shares his distaste, sending "ground swells" through the frozen earth to break the wall apart in places (Frost).
The narrator also possesses a sense of humor, which surfaces when the fence seems especially unnecessary between their adjacent woods: "He is all pine and I am apple orchard. / My apple trees will never get across / And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him. / He only says, 'Good fences make good neighbours'" (Frost). This is gently comic, but it is also ironic — the neighbor believes the only way to be a good neighbor is to place a barrier between the farms. It is a quietly sad observation, because the best neighbors, by implication, are those who would not need fences at all.
There is no such humor in "Mowing." Frost makes clear that the narrator of that poem is there to work. He is no-nonsense in his engagement with the hay, and this is evident when he reflects, "The fact is the sweetest dream that labour knows" (Frost). The narrator in "Mending Wall" has time to pause and reflect as he labors; the narrator who is mowing does not. That distinction is the major difference between the two poems: one is all work and no play, while the other is work interspersed with introspection and wonder. The man mending the wall is laboring because he must, not because he wishes to, whereas the man mowing hay seems to enjoy his work — and the sweat and hay it produces.
In "Mending Wall," the narrator's disregard for the fence reveals a deeper disregard for the division it creates. He does not see its necessity and makes that plain throughout the poem: "Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder / If I could put a notion in his head: / 'Why do they make good neighbours?' Isn't it / Where there are cows? But here there are no cows" (Frost). His humorous tone again surfaces, but so does his genuine displeasure — both with the wall itself and with the neighbor who insists upon it. He also wishes his neighbor might arrive at the same conclusion on his own: "I'd rather / He said it for himself" (Frost).
In conclusion, the two poems share a great deal in their themes, yet reveal considerable distance between their two central figures and their ultimate satisfaction with a job well done. Both "Mowing" and "Mending Wall" celebrate the joy of honest labor, but with very different results. In "Mowing," the man is satisfied by his labor; in "Mending Wall," he is not.
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.