Gensin Legal Services Purchasing: A Seven-Stage Case Study
This case study applies the seven-stage purchasing process to the acquisition of legal services at Gensin, a multinational firm. The paper examines how cross-functional teams can gather and evaluate input data to rationalize the supplier base, then uses Kraljic's matrix to classify legal services by financial and supply risk. It outlines a structured agenda for supplier-selection meetings, and evaluates the benefits and drawbacks of involving a centralized purchasing department in legal services procurement. Key themes include supplier aggregation, economies of scope and scale, information asymmetry, and the challenges of managing internationally diverse legal needs.
- Introduction: Applying the Seven-Stage Process at Gensin: Data collection, team composition, and supplier criteria
- Classifying Legal Services Using Kraljic's Matrix: Legal services mapped to four procurement quadrants
- Meeting Plan for Supplier Selection: Structured agenda for supplier shortlisting meetings
- Benefits of Centralizing Legal Services Purchasing: Objectivity, economies of scale, and buyer power gains
- Disadvantages and Barriers to Centralized Procurement: Information asymmetry and international complexity challenges
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies a recognized procurement framework (the seven-stage purchasing process) concretely to a non-traditional category — legal services — demonstrating conceptual flexibility.
- Uses Kraljic's matrix with specific legal service examples (tort liability, intellectual property, employment law) mapped to each quadrant, making abstract theory immediately actionable.
- Balances both sides of the centralization debate, noting genuine advantages such as objectivity and economies of scale alongside real disadvantages such as information asymmetry and international complexity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis: it takes established supply chain management models (the seven-stage process and Kraljic's matrix) and systematically tests them against a specific organizational scenario. This technique shows examiners that the student can move beyond definition to application, using cited theoretical sources to anchor practical recommendations.
Structure breakdown
The paper is divided into five question-response sections. The first and longest section walks through data collection, cross-functional team composition, supplier criteria, and contract monitoring for the seven-stage process. The second maps legal services onto Kraljic's four quadrants. The third presents a numbered meeting agenda. The fourth and fifth weigh the pros and cons of centralizing procurement, rounded off with a reference list in APA format.
Introduction: Applying the Seven-Stage Process at Gensin
To apply the seven-stage process to the purchase of legal services at Gensin, the first stage is to rationalize the supplier base. However, for this to occur there is a clear need to understand the services offered in order to categorize them and assess how they may be allocated to specific suppliers. As May and her department do not have the knowledge needed, it is important that relevant input data be collected to allow categories to be developed. Cross-functional teams can provide a high level of input, as long as the team includes those who will have the knowledge needed — for example, those who work directly with the services and those who handle the inputs and outputs (Grant, 2013). This indicates the members who should be present: these will include members from the firm's internal legal department and other staff who deal directly with the legal services purchased. For example, this may include senior management from most major departments, as many of these will have to deal directly or indirectly with legal issues — from the regulatory requirements of marketing through to employment and health and safety law, as well as issues such as product liability for the research and development department (MacIntyre, 2014). As May will also be looking at the way services may be allocated with the aim of reducing the number of suppliers, the potential for single firms to provide for different needs may also be considered. This may also mean that, as the task progresses, external members of legal firms may be invited to participate in some meetings.
The team members are important as they are able to provide both the input data and the knowledge and skills needed to assess that data and create the desired output. The data required will include, but not be limited to:
• Identification of the legal issues the firm has to deal with
• Identification of how these issues may vary across different countries
• A breakdown of the current spending on legal services divided by issue and country
• A list of the current legal services suppliers and the spend with each supplier
• Information on existing and potential legal suppliers, including which services they could offer if services were aggregated
• A schedule of the fees charged for services by the legal firms, and information on the degree to which these may be negotiated or subject to discounts
• Details of contacts at shortlisted legal firms
• Details of how the firm currently deals with its legal suppliers, including how contracts are allocated, how they are operated (including communication and the processes used for making decisions — for example, whether or not to settle), and the communication processes used
All of this data is needed in order to assess what is required and to ensure that the suppliers selected can provide the services needed, with the necessary expertise and the ability to deal with the firm efficiently.
Obtaining this data will be a time-consuming task. Details of the law firms used and amounts spent with each may be obtained from the accounting department, as they pay the bills and can therefore provide this data. However, data regarding the types of issues dealt with would need to be gathered from the firm's departments that use the services, and may also be gathered from the law firms themselves — although the firms may charge for collating that data. This element of the assessment process will require members of different departments to be present, who may need to refer back to their own departments or divisions to collect the relevant data.
With all the data collected, there will be several considerations regarding the way in which a supplier is selected. First, the element of expertise needs to be examined: a law firm with a high level of expertise is likely to create value by mitigating legal issues and providing sound advice. However, to obtain value, Gensin may also want to consider the variety of services offered. Some law firms may have expertise across different areas, and the scope and scale of services they can offer is significant. This would help create value by reducing the number of suppliers dealt with and may facilitate a greater degree of leverage. Likewise, while expertise may span different subject areas, there may also be potential for international firms to be leveraged in order to address legal matters across different countries. Obviously, fees will also need to be considered. Importantly, long-term relationships — including the current relationship between Gensin and potential suppliers — and the ability to leverage those relationships to create further value and develop trust may also be a consideration in terms of supply chain management (Trent, 2001). The most important criteria will be the level of expertise and the ability of suppliers to deal with the scope and scale of issues faced by Gensin, as well as factors such as fee transparency, followed by the fee level itself.
Monitoring and measuring the contracts once they are negotiated will be important. This will involve assessing not only the amounts paid, but also the cost of outcomes — for example, whether the new firms are defending against potential liability cases as effectively as past representation, and whether the advice is resulting in significant cost benefits. Transparency, compliance with scheduled fees, and satisfaction from internal stakeholders should also be considered.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.