This paper presents a comprehensive perspective on giftedness as a combination of outstanding potential, creativity, and motivation shaped by both nature and nurture. The author examines how gifted and talented (TAG) students require differentiated learning to thrive in typical school environments and discusses challenges in identification, including parental pressure, over-identification of high performers, and the need for data-driven models with human oversight. A key focus is recognizing twice-exceptional learners—students with both gifts and learning disabilities—and ensuring all students, regardless of ability profile, receive appropriate challenge and support.
To me, giftedness is possessing outstanding potential and/or ability to achieve at a significantly higher level than average. I believe that there must also be a high level of creativity involved. These potentials and abilities can include academic achievement, athletic achievement, creative arts achievement, cognitive skills, and problem-solving skills. To some extent, they are similar to multiple intelligences, though in most cases these talents would apply to one area. For example, a child who is gifted in mathematics may not be gifted in literature or the creative arts.
Furthermore, students who are gifted or talented may also possess a high level of motivation or task commitment. Without that motivation in place, a student can become a gifted underachiever. Identifying true giftedness requires recognizing not just raw ability, but also the drive to develop and apply that ability.
I believe that giftedness is brought about by both nature and nurture. A person may possess certain innate abilities; however, it is the environment in which they live that can help them flourish. A student may have natural talent in mathematics or music, but without exposure to resources, quality instruction, and encouragement, that gift may never fully develop. Conversely, environmental support and opportunity alone cannot create giftedness—there must be an underlying capacity present.
This interplay between innate potential and environmental nurturing is central to understanding why some talented students thrive while others remain underdeveloped. Schools play a critical role in providing the conditions necessary for gifted students to recognize and cultivate their abilities.
Gifted and talented students require differentiated learning in order to flourish in the typical school environment. Without this differentiation, they may become easily bored and even develop behavior problems. These students need to receive challenging work that engages and motivates them. However, as teachers, we must make sure that any enrichment-type work is not perceived as a punishment but rather as an opportunity for growth.
Despite their importance, TAG programs receive a very small percentage of school funding and are often among the first programs to be cut during budget crises. This underfunding undermines efforts to identify and support these students effectively.
One issue educators must be careful about is over-identifying bright or well-performing students as gifted. There is much pressure today from parents to place their children in TAG programs. I have often heard of parents pressuring teachers and administrators to enroll their children in TAG programs simply because they are A students or have scored extremely well on standardized tests like the CMT. In response to this pressure, some school districts have implemented data-driven identification models with little or no human input. While these models can measure student aptitude across multiple factors, they risk missing the qualitative dimensions of giftedness—such as creativity, leadership, and motivation—that require human judgment to recognize. A balanced approach that combines data-driven metrics with teacher observation and assessment is essential for accurate identification.
"Recognizing giftedness alongside learning disabilities and other challenges"
"Differentiated instruction, challenge, and engagement strategies for gifted students"
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.