This paper presents an Individual Education Plan (IEP) for a gifted 15-year-old female student in Florida with an IQ of 136 who has also been diagnosed with ADHD, anxiety, and OCD. The paper opens with an overview of giftedness as an innate intellectual ability and the historical trend toward mainstreaming gifted students. It then outlines the theoretical framework underlying gifted education, emphasizing psychological and developmental considerations alongside academic ones. The core of the paper is a structured IEP table addressing attention span, extended time, perfectionism, social skills, home assignments, and anxiety — each with corresponding curriculum modifications and supplementary support mechanisms. Specific learning objectives and backup strategies, including paraprofessional involvement and parental collaboration, are also detailed.
Giftedness is an intellectual ability that is significantly higher than average — not a learned skill, but an innate talent and aptitude that may be general or domain-specific. Just as there are special educational needs for children who fall on the left side of the bell curve, there should equally be provisions for children on the far right. However, gifted students are often neglected in terms of specialized programming, due to the belief that they can simply complete "extra work" within a mainstreamed environment.
From the 1920s to the 1970s, the trend in Western countries was to establish special schools to educate those who fell outside the norms of the bell curve. By the 1980s, however, most educators favored merging special and regular education into a comprehensive program that included students from all backgrounds — in other words, mainstreaming them into a regular classroom environment. This approach must also fit within the cultural precedents of the time; educators must respond to the needs of the nation, and public education remains responsible for meeting the needs of all students in society.
It is not enough to simply assign extra reading, additional math or science problems, or expect gifted children to work faster or more thoroughly. Instead, the theoretical framework of a gifted program must account for the individual needs of gifted children and actively work toward meeting those needs. Those needs may include more interaction and analytical discussion in language arts, conceptualizing and extending data into the broader spectrum in the sciences, or providing avenues for artistic growth in music or art (Elman, 1983).
As with any specialized population, there are challenges in teaching gifted learners. There are different approaches to managing behavior, especially when giftedness occurs within a diverse population group. Gifted education is not merely skill-based learning and assessment; it also requires a psychological consideration that, while a child may be gifted in one or more areas, they are still children emotionally, with the developmental and social needs appropriate to their age (Winebrenner, 2001).
An Individual Education Plan (IEP) is a working document that specifies what will be done to help a child better reach their potential. It sets out planned changes so that all stakeholders — teachers, parents, and students — understand what is planned, how the student will be evaluated, and what responses are necessary to help the student perform optimally. There are several ways this can be accomplished: differentiated curriculum, alternative approaches to curriculum delivery, targeted interventions, additional help, supplementary materials, and more (Hurwitz and Lacalamita, 2006).
The student is a 15-year-old female in Florida who was screened and diagnosed as gifted, with an IQ of 136, while in 4th grade. At the time of diagnosis, she was also identified with clinical ADHD, anxiety, and OCD. She is slow to complete tasks and extremely focused on achieving perfection in her work. She is frequently frustrated by classmates of lower-than-average intelligence. She was underperforming in English and Chemistry (earning C grades) until specific tutoring was arranged that provided greater structure and extended time. She continues to experience difficulties in Civics and Spanish, largely due to individual teachers' instructional styles and a lack of time and resources to address her needs.
The following IEP addresses six key characteristics identified for this student. For each characteristic, learning requirements, curriculum modifications, and additional supportive mechanisms are outlined to guide teachers, parents, and support staff.
Learning Requirements: Affective capacities may be demonstrated by high motivation in certain topical areas; there is a discrepancy between her engagement level and the general curriculum.
Curriculum Modifications: Work with the teacher to identify modifications within the curriculum that align with the student's interests and focus on those; use preloading strategies to build engagement.
Additional Supportive Mechanisms: Tutoring or an older student mentor to help maintain focus on tasks; this arrangement could also be implemented in conjunction with a local teacher's college or training program.
Learning Requirements: OCD and perfectionism (see below) cause an over-emphasis on details. This often results in assignments being submitted late or only partially completed.
Curriculum Modifications: The goal is to move toward full integration within the classroom setting; begin by offering some extended time and then gradually reduce it based on performance in particular subject areas.
Additional Supportive Mechanisms: Use of a digital timer; practice timing and goal-setting; employ both short- and long-term strategies to encourage timely completion of work.
Learning Requirements: The student cannot submit work without it meeting an untenable personal standard of perfection.
"Six-area IEP table with modifications and support mechanisms"
"Targeted goals and contingency plans for student success"
"Cited sources in gifted and special education literature"
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.