This paper examines government financial solvency through the lens of Bay City, Texas (FY 2016), using three core financial ratios — the current ratio, operating ratio, and net asset ratio — to assess the city's short- and long-term fiscal health. It explains the concept of cutoff points and how Bay City's ratios compare favorably against them. The paper also surveys common solvency methods used by governments, including cash flow analysis, asset management, and risk management, and distinguishes solvency from liquidity. The analysis concludes that Bay City is financially stable and unlikely to face insolvency, provided it manages spending and maintains its tax revenue base.
There are a number of different solvency methods and techniques that governments can use in order to stay financially afloat. One of the most popular and commonly used solvency methods is tax revenue — the collection of taxes from citizens to generate income. Another method is borrowing money, which can be done through issuing bonds or taking out loans. Governments may also maintain reserve funds to cover expenses, setting aside money specifically for emergencies. Finally, governments may rely on grants or other forms of financial assistance from external sources.
Solvency methods and techniques are important for governments because they allow them to generate income and remain financially stable. Without these methods, governments would quickly become insolvent and would be unable to function properly. This paper examines the degree of solvency of Bay City, Texas, as a practical illustration of these topics. It discusses several financial ratios and their implications, examines cutoff points and solvency methods, explains what solvency is and how it addresses financial issues, and concludes with a comparison of solvency and liquidity. All of these are important matters for government, for as the Bible states, "But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever" (1 Timothy 5:8).
The following ratios were calculated from Bay City, Texas, FY 2016 financial data:
Cash Solvency — Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities): Current Assets: $13,606,925 | Current Liabilities: $4,974,732 | Ratio: 2.7
Budget Solvency — Operating Ratio (Total Revenue / Total Expenses): Total Revenue: $26,768,960 | Total Expenses: $23,337,612 | Ratio: 1.1
Long-Run Solvency — Net Asset Ratio (Total Assets / Restricted + Unrestricted Assets): Total Assets: $59,289,046 | Restricted + Unrestricted Assets: $4,704,065 | Ratio: 12.6
Bay City, Texas, has a current ratio of 2.7, which is favorable. The current ratio is a financial metric that measures the proportion of an organization's current assets relative to its current liabilities. This ratio is used to assess the financial stability of an organization and its ability to meet short-term obligations (Okunev, 2022). A high ratio indicates that the organization has a comparatively low proportion of current liabilities and is therefore more financially stable, while a low ratio may signal risk of default. The ideal current ratio is generally considered to be 1.50, meaning the organization has sufficient assets to cover its liabilities. A ratio greater than 1.50 indicates a good financial position and a lower likelihood of default. With a current ratio of 2.7, Bay City is therefore unlikely to face any defaults in the foreseeable future.
Bay City, Texas, has an operating ratio of 1.1, meaning the city has just enough revenue to cover its expenses. A government's operating ratio is calculated by dividing its total revenue by its total expenses. If the ratio is greater than 1.00, it means that operating expenses do not exceed revenue — a positive sign for financial stability, indicating that the government should be able to cover its expenses going forward (Cherry & Garston, 1982). Conversely, a ratio below 1.00 signals that expenditures exceed revenues, which is cause for concern. A government's operating ratio can also be used to compare its financial stability to that of peer governments; a higher ratio generally signals stronger relative fiscal health.
Bay City, Texas, has a net asset ratio of 12.6, which is very strong and indicates a high likelihood of long-term solvency. The net asset ratio is a key financial metric measuring the stability of an organization. A ratio greater than 1.50 indicates a strong financial position and likely stability over the next fiscal year, while a ratio below 1.00 signals financial risk (Okunev, 2022). The net asset ratio is calculated by dividing total assets by total liabilities. This ratio is important for investors and creditors when assessing the financial health of an organization or government. A high net asset ratio is indicative of a strong balance sheet and can provide confidence to those considering investing in or lending to the city.
A cutoff point is a predetermined value used to classify data points. In the context of financial ratios, cutoff points are used to determine whether a ratio is considered good or poor. For example, a government might use a cutoff point of 2.0 to evaluate its current ratio: if the current ratio falls below 2.0, the entity is considered to have a poor current ratio; if it exceeds 2.0, the entity is in a good position. Cutoff points are often somewhat arbitrary and can vary by context, but they are useful for quickly assessing whether a particular ratio falls within an acceptable range.
The data for each of Bay City's ratios compare favorably to their respective cutoff points. Performance is strongest for the net asset ratio and tightest — though still acceptable — for the operating ratio. None of the three ratios indicates that the city has crossed into concerning territory. With a net asset ratio of 12.6, the city demonstrates that it holds sufficient assets to cover expenses at more than a 12:1 ratio through liquidation, should the need ever arise. Because the current ratio is well above its cutoff point and the operating ratio is above its cutoff point, there is no present need for any form of asset liquidation. In short, the city has no urgent fiscal concerns. Its operating ratio could stand to be improved, but as long as it remains above its cutoff point, the city can be assured of covering all its expenses.
"Cash flow, asset, and risk management explained"
"Definition of solvency and its role in fiscal health"
"Key differences between long- and short-term fiscal measures"
Cherry, R., & Garston, N. (1982). Operating ratio regulation: A control theory approach. Transportation Science, 16(1), 67–82.
Enright, M. (2021). Solvency ratios measure financial risk. Retrieved from https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/solvency-ratios-measure-financial-risk
Freshbooks. (2019). What is solvency vs. liquidity? Retrieved from https://www.freshbooks.com/hub/accounting/solvency-vs-liquidity
Okunev, R. (2022). Financial ratios. In Analytics for Retail (pp. 53–63). Apress, Berkeley, CA.
Santomil, P. D., & González, L. O. (2020). Enterprise risk management and Solvency II: The system of governance and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment. The Journal of Risk Finance.
Walter, J. E. (1957). Determination of technical solvency. The Journal of Business, 30(1), 30–43.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.