This paper conducts a sentence-level grammatical analysis of Sandra Bisin's article "UNICEF-Supported Soap Opera Raises Awareness about HIV/AIDS in Niger," published on the official UNICEF website. The analysis examines four primary grammatical categories: inflectional morphology, verb usage and tense, word classes, and clause structure. The paper identifies a small number of errors — including an incorrect title capitalization format, a past tense used where present perfect is required, and a pronoun-antecedent disagreement in a passive construction — while acknowledging that the article is generally well written. The findings challenge the introductory premise that contemporary writing suffers from widespread grammatical decline.
It is often said that today's generations tend to learn less than older ones did in the past. Children in contemporary society have increased access to resources and technologies and may easily prefer a computer game to a math exercise. This is somewhat understandable, especially when the educational system has not evolved at the rapid pace of other advancements and therefore fails to attract pupils by presenting the same lessons it offered five decades ago — lessons that are no longer applicable in today's social context.
As a result, it may be true that today's generations possess less knowledge than past generations. This is often apparent in the way children speak and in the numerous grammatical mistakes they make. However fashionable it may be to say "wanna" instead of "want to," such usage does not reflect a strong education or a solid knowledge of English grammar.
What is even more troubling is that grammatical errors in both written and spoken communication are becoming increasingly common among adults as well. Such errors are more forgivable in spoken communication, where they may occur for reasons beyond simple ignorance. Verbal communication is more difficult to control because the speaker has less time to organize his or her thoughts, or may be nervous about presenting ideas. In written communication, on the other hand, grammatical mistakes should not occur. Written communication is more formal, and the writer has time to organize thoughts and even research phrases that may not seem entirely correct.
In order to examine the reality behind claims of reduced attention to grammatical correctness, one should conduct a deeper analysis of various contemporary texts. The analysis of a formal text serves as a good starting point in this direction. Sandra Bisin's article "UNICEF-Supported Soap Opera Raises Awareness about HIV/AIDS in Niger," published on the official UNICEF website, has been chosen to serve this purpose.
The first point to address is the article's title. While it is catchy and captures the essence of the work, from a grammatical standpoint its formatting is incorrect. Outside the acronym UNICEF, which must be spelled in capitals, the title is written in lowercase. The rules of English grammar state, however, that the first letter of major words in a title must be written in capital letters — that is, in uppercase.
Regarding capitalization more broadly, it is required in the following circumstances: the pronoun I; the first word of a sentence; proper nouns; family relations used as titles (e.g., Aunt Augusta); names of God and other deities; weekdays, months, and holidays; countries; the first letter of a quoted sentence; major words in titles; names of groups (e.g., African-Americans); periods and events; and trademarks and brand names (the Owl at Purdue, 2008).
Concerning capital letters in titles specifically, grammar rules state that short prepositions and the articles the, an, and a should not be capitalized unless they begin the title. Keeping these specifications in mind, the title of the article under discussion should have read: UNICEF-Supported Soap Opera Raises Awareness about HIV/AIDS in Niger.
Beyond the title, a first reading of the article does not reveal additional grammatical mistakes. The observations in the following sections were identified after multiple readings and do not necessarily indicate errors, but rather offer analysis of how grammar could have been used in alternative ways. The analysis proceeds by examining several distinct grammatical issues.
Inflectional morphology refers to the changes made to a word in order to produce a related form, often achieved by adding suffixes, prefixes, inflections, or plurals — for example, transforming danger into endangered (Lee). From this standpoint, Bisin's article presents several positive examples, including:
The list of such examples is quite long within the given article. It should also be noted that inflectional morphology can be generated by joining two separate words to form a new one — for instance, the noun forefront from the noun fore and the adjective front, or the verb to overcome from the verb to come and the preposition over.
It must also be stated that the author did not always apply the concepts of inflectional morphology as effectively as possible. The most relevant example is the use of the phrase the programme, titled 'Soueba' instead of the more appropriate the programme, entitled 'Soueba'. Another instance of less effective usage is the phrase an entertainment rather than simply entertainment.
"Tense selection and verb transformation examples"
"Clause types and pronoun-antecedent agreement"
"Overall assessment of grammatical quality"
You’re 42% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.