This paper presents a reflective analysis of two volunteer groups, with a primary focus on a local medical center's health promotion group. Drawing on Tuckman's forming-storming-norming-performing model, the author examines how the group progressed through developmental stages, identifies problematic dynamics such as dominator behavior and unequal participation, and evaluates the facilitation strategies used by the group's administrator. The paper also proposes facilitation improvements the author would implement, including structured individual planning time and ensuring all members feel their contributions are valued. Together, these reflections illustrate core principles of effective group development and facilitation.
Groups are collections of people who agree to work together toward a shared goal. I was a member of a volunteer group that assisted psychoeducational processes in a hospital. That group helped students and patients learn foundational concepts and develop educational memory. I have also been a part of a Medicare group — a local medical center's health promotion group that I joined as a part-time member due to my educational commitments. The purpose of this group was to help community members lead healthy and happy lives by adopting healthy habits, such as quitting smoking and drugs and exercising regularly. The group was formed at the initiative of an Administrator, who led it then and continues to lead it today. Initially there was friction among group members, but relationships settled with time.
Groups often get stuck at the storming stage. Because the local medical center's group was composed of mature and experienced professionals, the storming stage was not particularly intense; nevertheless, it consumed the most time. Tuckman's forming-storming-norming-performing model (2013) describes the typical path groups follow: forming was relatively quick, followed by a prolonged storming phase in which members disputed the roles and responsibilities assigned to them. The group then transitioned into the norming stage and began to perform effectively. Although these stages are most apparent at the time of group formation, they are often repeated whenever a new project or plan is introduced.
Knowledge of group facilitation was instrumental in navigating the stages of group development. A facilitator, unlike a traditional leader, does not simply direct what must be done; rather, a facilitator establishes guidelines and provides the right environment for objectives to be achieved. In this group, the Administrator applied facilitation principles by ensuring that every member felt comfortable expressing their opinion and participating in discussions, that everyone's contributions were recognized and appreciated, and that criticism of other members was not tolerated (Axner, 2013). These measures helped create a more inclusive and productive group climate.
"Dominator behavior and unequal member recognition"
"Annual evaluation, new projects, and role of coordinator"
If required to facilitate the group in addition to coordinating, I would prioritize selecting the right time and place for group meetings and brainstorming sessions. I do not advocate for excessive meetings; instead, I would give members time to develop their ideas individually before convening as a group, so that meeting time is used efficiently (Axner, 2013). I would also make deliberate efforts to ensure that members whose opinions were not ultimately followed still felt that their contributions were genuinely valued. Effective facilitation requires not only managing process but also protecting the dignity and engagement of every participant.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.