This paper examines the Pacific Plan, a document adopted by Pacific Islands Forum leaders to address developmental challenges across the Pacific region through strengthened regional cooperation and integration. The paper traces the Plan's historical origins from the South Pacific Conference era through the formation of the Eminent Persons Group and the eventual drafting of the document in 2005. It then analyzes how the Plan's four core pillars—economic growth, sustainable development, good governance, and security—propose to address regional challenges. Finally, it considers criticisms of the Pacific Plan, including its non-binding legal status and concerns that it prioritizes regional political interests over local community needs.
The Pacific Plan is a document adopted by the forum leaders of the Pacific Island nations, aiming to address various challenges that these nations face. Through strengthening regional cooperation and integration, the leaders projected that various developmental challenges would eventually be overcome. The underlying principle is that the Pacific region should be free from conflict, full of peace, harmony, positive economic growth, and improved security — enabling the people living in the region to lead free and satisfactory lives.
This paper examines the origins of the Pacific Plan, the manner in which it addresses various development challenges in the Pacific region, and the reasons why some critics consider the document a sham.
The Pacific Plan is not the first effort in the Pacific region aimed at increasing cooperation, improving coordination, and advancing integration. During an estimated five decades prior to the adoption of the Pacific Plan, initiatives such as the South Pacific Conference and the Pacific Islands Forum had been created to realize similar objectives. According to the ADB-Commonwealth Study focused on New Pacific Regionalism, the origin of the Pacific Plan is associated with two specific trends (ADB-Commonwealth Secretariat 34). The first trend relates to advanced regionalism that would bring the regions closer together. The second was rooted in growing concerns from a number of Forum Island Countries (FICs) regarding how some Pacific Island nations were governed, and whether the Pacific Islands Forum had the capacity to handle the breakdown of governance and socio-economic conditions (ADB-Commonwealth Secretariat 35).
The origin of the Pacific Plan can be traced to a period when Pacific leaders desired greater self-determination. This goes as far back as 1965, when Ratu Mara supported the idea that additional decision-making powers should be given to the South Pacific Conference (SPC), beyond its existing advisory role. He encouraged other regional leaders to lobby for this recommendation. As a result, the Pacific Islands Producers' Association (PIPA) was formed, with the main objective of ensuring that agricultural products from New Zealand were purchased at better prices (Browne 51). This initiative demonstrated that Pacific leaders were willing to move beyond the limitations of the SPC framework and create a mechanism with greater responsibility and power to formulate strategies for improving development in the region.
A common dialogue across all regional bodies in the Pacific has been the need for countries to act collectively to ensure that Pacific needs are placed on the global agenda. These needs include proposals for a common economic framework to regulate markets, trade, and currency; the provision of necessary resources; and the creation of regional institutions to enhance sustainable development. Additional needs encompassed regional development — both economically and politically — as well as the enhancement of social and cultural values, as documented in the Pacific Way (Browne 47).
A meeting was held in Auckland in 2003 with the aim of aligning Pacific countries with efforts toward the realization of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The main objective was for FICs to meet and formulate practical solutions that would include the Pacific Region in global MDG efforts, ensuring the region would not lag behind while the rest of the world advanced. Sir Julius Chan was chosen to lead the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) that was formed. This group was created to develop appropriate mechanisms that would provide practical solutions addressing the socio-economic and political challenges facing some FICs, while also empowering FICs in decision-making and ensuring that Australia and New Zealand were not the only countries driving regional responses (Maiava 14).
The report presented by the EPG recommended that leaders develop a shared vision that would allow for a framework supporting a stronger Pacific Way. The Pacific Vision was formally articulated by the then Deputy Prime Minister of Samoa (Retzlaff) during a speech delivered to the Asian Development Bank. This vision was formally adopted by the Forum leaders at a meeting in New Zealand in April 2004 (Retzlaff 92). The adopted vision stipulated that the leaders believed the Pacific region had the potential to attain — and would work toward — peace, harmony, economic success, and improved security, ultimately guaranteeing the people of the Pacific region free and worthwhile lives.
In the vision, the leaders expressed their commitment to maintaining the diversity of the Pacific and to ensuring that the cultures, religious beliefs, and traditions of its people were valued and preserved. They also articulated a vision in which the Pacific Region would be respected for the quality of its governance, sustainable resource management, adherence to democratic values, and the protection of human rights (Pratt 26). The vision concluded with a pledge to partner with neighboring nations to develop the region's knowledge base, improve communication, and ensure sustainable economic participation globally. In 2005, a task force was appointed to spearhead the formulation of the Pacific Plan Document, with senior officials from FICs serving as its members.
The Pacific Plan consolidates a range of responses to the development challenges facing countries in the region. These responses are categorized into four major pillars: good governance, security, economic prosperity, and sustainable development. Under economic growth, the Plan targeted improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of infrastructure development (Sercombe and Peebles 133), along with increased investment and sustainable trade.
Under sustainable development, the Plan targeted reductions in poverty, as well as improvements in health, education, and gender equality. To improve governance, the Plan aimed to increase transparency, equity, and accountability in the management of regional resources. On security, the recommended approach was to improve political and social conditions so that safety and stability could be ensured. The strategies developed to address each development challenge were tailored to each pillar and implemented in phases, with an initial review period of three years to measure progress.
To achieve economic growth, expansion of trade markets was recommended through the region's major trade agreements, particularly the Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA). This would help eliminate the problem of limited trade options that many countries faced. It was also proposed that trade in services be integrated into both PICTA and the Economic Partnerships Agreement (EPA), including provisions for the temporary movement of labor. Additionally, the effective and timely implementation of the Regional Trade Facilitation Programme (RTFP) was emphasized to enable countries to transact more easily across national boundaries.
Another strategy for economic growth was the implementation of the Forum Principles on Regional Transport Services (FPRTS) to improve the movement of goods to and from various markets. A key project under these principles was the development of the Pacific Aviation Safety Office (PASO), which would be responsible for ensuring aviation safety across the region. While most supported institutions were in the public sector, the Plan also recognized the importance of the private sector and proposed mechanisms to support private sector development.
In addressing sustainable development challenges, several steps were proposed. It was recommended that National Sustainable Development Strategies (NSDS) be developed and implemented using relevant indicators and appropriate cross-cutting approaches (Retzlaff 47). Conservation and resource management measures were to be developed at both the national and regional levels to ensure fisheries resources were utilized sustainably. Policies and plans governing waste management were also to be developed, as environmental pollution represents a significant obstacle to development. Recognizing that affordable and environmentally friendly energy was lacking in many Pacific communities, the Plan recommended implementation of the Pacific Islands Energy Policy and related strategic action plans.
"Transparency, accountability, and regional security measures"
"Non-binding status and unmet objectives critique"
The Pacific Plan is a document whose origin can be traced to the early decisions of Pacific leaders to pursue regional integration. In 2005, it was officially drafted with the goal of strengthening cooperation and integration across the region. Its objectives were organized into four general pillars — economic growth, sustainable development, good governance, and security — with specific strategies developed for each. As an example of the broader challenges of regional integration in the developing world, the Pacific Plan illustrates both the ambition and the limitations of policy-driven cooperation frameworks. While critics challenge the document's non-binding nature and its growing list of unmet objectives, the Plan nonetheless represents a meaningful expression of the collective aspirations of Pacific Island nations.
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.