This paper analyzes Ernest Hemingway's short story "Soldier's Home" as a timeless portrait of the difficulties faced by combat veterans upon returning home. Through close reading of the protagonist Krebs's psychological isolation, strained family relationships, inability to communicate his war experiences, and avoidance of romantic relationships, the paper draws parallels between the post-World War I veteran experience and that of soldiers returning from Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. The analysis also traces the evolution from the World War I concept of "shell shock" to the modern diagnosis of PTSD, arguing that Hemingway's story endures not because it was prophetic, but because the psychological wounds of warfare are fundamentally unchanged across generations.
The paper demonstrates thematic comparative analysis: it uses a single literary text as a lens through which to examine a recurring social phenomenon across different historical periods. By anchoring each thematic point in specific textual evidence (direct quotations from the story) before extending the argument to modern military contexts, the writer shows how close reading and broader cultural commentary can work together effectively.
The paper opens with a contextual introduction establishing the story's premise and its cross-generational relevance. It then proceeds thematically — communication failure, psychological deterioration, family tension, mental health terminology, and romantic withdrawal — before closing with a synthesis that reframes the story's importance. Each section builds on the previous one, tracking Krebs's progressive disconnection from society.
Although Ernest Hemingway's Soldier's Home was written in 1925, and the war it depicts was fought in a different era, several aspects of the story still ring true today for servicemen and servicewomen. In the story, Krebs — the main character — undergoes profound changes while serving overseas in the Marine Corps. Krebs is a young man from Kansas who is in college at the time he is drafted. He leaves his friends and family to fight for his country, much as young men and women in today's armed forces do. According to the author, Krebs fights in some of the toughest battles ever waged: Belleau Wood, Soissons, Champagne, St. Mihiel, and the Argonne Forest (187). Upon returning home from combat, he feels deeply out of place — a feeling shared by many soldiers returning today from Iraq and Afghanistan. The problems troops face when coming home from war, whether from World War I or from present-day conflicts, are not so different in the way they are handled by the soldier himself or in the way society regards them.
There has been a great deal of scholarly analysis of Hemingway's story in relation to various wars and military actions since it was first published. Some modern scholars have noted an uncanny resemblance between Krebs's experiences and those of soldiers returning home from Vietnam, despite the fact that the story was written half a century before the United States entered armed conflict in Southeast Asia. As the modern understanding of warfare has moved closer to what combat actually is — rather than the glorified image previously presented to the public — violence seems only to echo more violence across the generations.
Krebs enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1917 from a Methodist college in Kansas and went directly into combat. He does not return home until the summer of 1919, far later than the other servicemen had returned. As a result, he receives no parades or celebrations to welcome him back. As the author describes it, "By the time Krebs returned to his home town in Oklahoma the greeting of heroes was over" (187). He also struggles to engage in meaningful conversation with people around him, because by that point they are simply not interested in what he has to say about the war — the other returned soldiers had already told their stories, often greatly exaggerated. Krebs's truthful accounts, drawn from real combat experience, come across as boring or unbelievable by comparison. This dynamic mirrors the experience of some soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan today, where those who embellish their stories attract attention while those who witnessed actual combat often prefer silence.
This silence creates a very real problem for Krebs. Sharing one's experience is a way of coping, and Krebs's attempts at a return to normalcy are undermined by his inability to share his changed perception of "normal" with anyone. Furthermore, the fact that other returning soldiers have told outright lies about what they saw and accomplished makes even Krebs's authentic war-time experiences seem unreal or uninteresting to those around him. This erects major barriers to his attempts to rebuild normal relationships and communicate his changed attitudes and perspectives.
Krebs eventually begins telling stories to the local population, but he is forced to lie in order to hold their attention. As he continues to exaggerate alongside the other soldiers in town, the author suggests that Krebs begins to feel sickened by the deception. Krebs starts to feel "badly, sickeningly, frightened all the time," and "in this way he had lost everything" (188). This creates a profound sense of disconnect for the character. His core values — his integrity, his honor, and the valor that might be considered the defining features of a righteous soldier — ultimately succumb to the relentless erosion caused by his community's refusal to hear him honestly. He even lies to his mother, at one point telling her he no longer loves her and probably never did, claiming he had not truly understood what love meant until he experienced war, only to immediately retract the statement and say he did not mean any of it.
The issues Krebs experiences with his family closely resemble those described by soldiers returning from numerous conflicts, including Vietnam and more recent deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. When a person witnesses the horrors of daily combat, death, and violence, they become fundamentally changed in ways that are simply not comprehensible to those who have not shared the same experiences. As Soldier's Home and subsequent scholarship on the story clearly show — alongside countless unrelated sources — the growing emotional distance this creates is especially damaging within families.
The problems with the American soldier returning home from combat are worse than people may think. They go a lot deeper than people may think, ranging from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury to hearing loss, anxiety, depression, and isolation. These are largely unseen wounds that have been written about since at least 1925. Hemingway's story is not prescient or "ahead of its time" simply because it recognized and described issues that can now be mapped onto modern diagnoses. Rather, it is the fundamental commonality of the warfare experience — from the First World War to present-day conflicts — that makes this work enduringly relevant. The fact that Hemingway so accurately describes what we now call PTSD matters less than the fact that the disorder itself still exists, and for the same reasons it existed nearly a hundred years ago. Until mankind learns to end warfare, traumas like those experienced by Krebs and by real soldiers in ongoing conflicts will continue to give rise to psychological disorders like PTSD, as described in Soldier's Home and by countless servicemen and servicewomen who have served honorably in combat zones.
You’re 39% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.