This policy memo addresses the County Board of Supervisors of Utopia regarding the problem of jail overcrowding and the decision of what type of new facility to build. The paper begins by distinguishing jails from prisons, noting their locally operated status, shorter sentences, and diverse inmate populations. It then examines the root causes of overcrowding, considering whether holding jails or processing jails might be appropriate in certain scenarios. Ultimately, the memo argues that a high-use jail is the most suitable solution, given its capacity to house a wider variety of inmates for longer periods, accommodate more violent offenders, and provide rehabilitative programming that addresses the broader systemic causes of overcrowding.
To: The County Board of Supervisors, County of Utopia
Re: Overcrowding and the Decision to Build a New Jail
When reviewing this important decision, it is first necessary to recall the general definition of a jail and how it differs from other correctional facilities. According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, jails — unlike prisons — are locally rather than state or federally operated institutions. They tend to serve a population of inmates that is smaller, less violent, and designated for a shorter term of incarceration. Jails also serve a wider variety of the incarcerated population, including persons who have not yet been convicted as well as those who have, and individuals held on only a temporary basis.
Jails may confine people before or after arraignment, trial, conviction, or sentencing. They may also hold prisoners who have been returned to custody following a violation of the terms of their probation or parole, as well as persons being transferred to the custody of other criminal authorities. Jail sentences are usually one year or less in duration ("What is the difference between jail and prison?" 2006, CDC).
Since the purpose of the new jail is to address the problem of overcrowding, the first question must be: why is the overcrowding occurring? Is it because of problems moving defendants through the system and a lack of speedy due process? If so, the problem may lie with the police system or the courts rather than the jails themselves, although a new holding or processing facility might still help address this issue.
A new holding jail would be appropriate if law enforcement is having difficulty managing the containment of prisoners who may or may not be guilty — such as, most commonly, persons picked up for disorderly conduct who may benefit from sobering up overnight, as well as individuals likely to be charged with more serious crimes. A processing jail might also be useful in addressing a bureaucratic backlog caused by insufficient administrative resources to process inmates into the system before they are sent to state or federal facilities.
"Frames the core decision between two facility types"
"Argues for high-use jail's rehabilitative and monitoring capacity"
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.