This paper examines the legal framework protecting homebuyers from discrimination in housing transactions. It outlines three primary remedies available to victims of discriminatory practices: filing complaints with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), pursuing civil litigation under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and seeking assistance from civil liberties organizations. The paper also details the statutory protections established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, including amendments that expanded coverage to protect against discrimination based on disability and familial status. Together, these laws and enforcement mechanisms provide comprehensive protections ensuring fair access to housing regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability status.
In cases where homebuyers face housing discrimination, several distinct legal remedies are available. The most notable include filing a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), suing the homeowner for violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and contacting anti-discrimination or civil liberties organizations. Any one of these actions, or a combination of them, will force the homeowner to reconsider their discriminatory position (Devey, 2007).
HUD was granted enforcement authority over these areas as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This law makes it illegal for anyone to discriminate against individuals in employment, housing, and other places of public interest. Those who violate the law are subject to civil litigation and the possibility of paying monetary damages for their actions. HUD's primary responsibility is to investigate and enforce the law. If homebuyers report a violation to HUD, the agency will investigate and work with the seller to determine how they are breaking the law. If the homeowner refuses to comply, HUD can file a claim in federal court seeking damages and requiring them to comply with the law. At this point, the violator will face fines, legal fees, and substantial awards to the plaintiff (Devey, 2007).
Another option is for the victims to hire an attorney and sue the homeowner for violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in federal court. This approach will lead to the same results as utilizing HUD, with the primary difference being that the victims are taking direct legal action against the seller. Once litigation begins, the seller faces the possibility of severe monetary damages or will more than likely settle the case. In either outcome, the plaintiffs will prevail and can determine the best avenue for moving forward (Devey, 2007).
A third option is to contact the American Civil Liberties Union, which specializes in investigating and litigating matters involving civil rights. In such cases, the organization will help guide victims through the legal process while simultaneously publicizing the homeowner's discriminatory conduct through media outreach. This strategy increases the pressure facing the homeowner, with public perception shifting as they become identified as discriminatory. In many situations, this public exposure proves problematic for the homeowner, as it negatively affects their standing in the community and business relationships. When this occurs, they may lose money as potential buyers walk away due to negative press (Devey, 2007).
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects homebuyers against discrimination in housing. The statute provides that "it is the policy of the United States to provide, within constitutional limitations, for fair housing throughout the United States. Upon enactment of this subchapter, [fair housing protections apply to] (A) dwellings owned or operated by the Federal Government; (B) dwellings provided in whole or in part with the aid of loans, advances, grants, or contributions made by the Federal Government; (C) dwellings provided in whole or in part by loans insured, guaranteed, or otherwise secured by the credit of the Federal Government; (D) dwellings provided by the development or the redevelopment of real property purchased, rented, or otherwise obtained from a State or local public agency receiving Federal financial assistance for slum clearance or urban renewal with respect to such real property under loan or grant contracts" (Devey, 2007).
This foundational statute established the federal government's commitment to eliminating housing discrimination and created enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance. The law applies to a broad range of housing types and financing arrangements, reflecting a comprehensive approach to fair housing access.
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 further expanded protections against housing discrimination. This law specifically prohibits discrimination in rentals, sales, and financing based on race, nationality, gender, color, or disabilities. According to HUD's official guidance, "The law prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental and financing of dwellings based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Title VIII was amended in 1988 (effective March 12, 1989) by the Fair Housing Amendments Act, which: (1) expanded the coverage of the Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination based on disability or on familial status (presence of child under age of 18, and pregnant women); (2) established new administrative enforcement mechanisms with HUD attorneys bringing actions before administrative law judges on behalf of victims of housing discrimination; and (3) revised and expanded Justice Department jurisdiction to bring suit on behalf of victims in Federal district courts" ("The Fair Housing Act," 2014).
These amendments represent a significant expansion of protected classes and enforcement authority, ensuring that more vulnerable populations receive comprehensive legal protections in the housing market.
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 significantly expanded federal protections. This law specifically prohibits discrimination in rentals, sales, and financing based on race, nationality, gender, color, and disabilities. The 1988 amendments further strengthened these protections by adding disability and familial status to the list of protected categories and by creating new administrative enforcement mechanisms through HUD and expanded Justice Department authority. Together, these statutory frameworks ensure that enforcement of fair housing law reaches both administrative and federal court proceedings, providing multiple pathways for victims to seek justice and for the government to compel compliance with fair housing requirements.
References
"HUD administrative enforcement and Justice Department jurisdiction"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.