HR Lawsuits: Three Critical Mistakes Managers Must Avoid
This paper examines three critical human resources mistakes that expose organizations to lawsuits: discriminatory hiring practices, inadequate performance documentation, and failure to take employee complaints seriously. Drawing on HR compliance resources, the paper outlines how employers can inadvertently violate employment law during the hiring, evaluation, and termination process — and offers practical guidance for avoiding those pitfalls. Topics covered include crafting neutral job advertisements, conducting legally sound interviews, documenting performance reviews thoroughly, and maintaining fair workplace complaint procedures.
- Introduction: Why HR lawsuit avoidance remains essential
- Hiring: Be Professional, Not Chatty: Avoiding discriminatory language and interview questions
- Evaluation: The Importance of Documentation: Documenting performance and accommodations thoroughly
- Not Taking All Complaints Seriously: Handling employee complaints and ensuring fair treatment
- Conclusion: Treating employees as valued organizational assets
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Concrete, relatable examples illustrate abstract legal concepts — such as the "lifting fifty pounds for a desk job" scenario — making compliance pitfalls immediately understandable.
- The paper maintains a practical, action-oriented tone throughout, translating legal risk into specific managerial behaviors employers can change.
- Each section maps cleanly to a phase of the employment lifecycle (hiring, evaluation, complaint handling), giving the argument a logical and memorable structure.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper applies a problem-solution framework at the paragraph level: each mistake is first defined, then illustrated with an example, and finally paired with a corrective best practice. This technique is especially effective in applied professional writing because it connects theory to workplace behavior without requiring the reader to bridge that gap independently.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief contextual introduction establishing why HR lawsuit avoidance remains relevant despite a changing workplace. It then proceeds through three thematically distinct sections — discriminatory hiring, documentation failures, and complaint neglect — before closing with a summary appeal to treat employees as organizational assets. The structure mirrors a short business memo, which suits the subject matter and audience.
Introduction
Work has changed in many significant ways over the past decade. The workforce is more diverse, and working from home is now common practice in many offices. But one thing that has not changed is the need for the human resources department to avoid lawsuits. Lawsuits may arise due to intentional bad actions on the part of managers, or unintentional violations that are misconstrued. Regardless, managers must avoid both the appearance of impropriety and deliberate violations during the hiring, evaluation, and termination process.
Hiring: Be Professional, Not Chatty
Being professional means phrasing employment advertisements in a way that is not intentionally discriminatory. Requested education and experience should directly relate to the needs of the advertised position. For example, demanding that a candidate be able to lift fifty pounds as a requirement for a desk job could be viewed as discriminatory against physically disabled persons. Avoiding questions during the interview process that could unintentionally reveal race, religion, ethnicity, disability, pregnancy status, or other protected characteristics of a potential employee is also critical (2020 top 11 actions, 2020).
Sometimes employers who wish to build rapport and engage in icebreaking conversations with candidates can mistakenly fall into a minefield. For example, asking a prospective employee whether they have children, or whether the candidate had a good Christmas, can expose the employer to claims of discriminatory inquiry.
Evaluation: The Importance of Documentation
Often, employers who wish to be positive and avoid discouraging employees may not include the full range of reasons an employee's performance is unsatisfactory in their written reviews. Not only does this undercut the effectiveness of performance evaluations, but if the employee must eventually be terminated, the employee may claim he or she was discriminated against because of a protected status — pointing to a lack of negative comments on prior performance reviews (2020 top 11 actions, 2020). If the employer makes accommodations for the employee, such as allowing the employee to work from home during an extended illness, this should also be documented to demonstrate that the employer takes reasonable steps to meet employee needs.
Managers should also be briefed on how to communicate criticism in a positive and respectful manner, without referencing protected employee characteristics. For example, saying to a parent, "I know it's been hard to give full attention to your work because the kids are home on winter break," introduces a protected characteristic into a performance discussion in a way that could later be used as evidence of bias (5 best practices, 2015). Employers should additionally avoid favoritism, including informally socializing with small groups of employees in ways that may disadvantage others — such as going out with male employees to a sports bar, or holding a faith-based optional leadership seminar (5 best practices, 2015).
Conclusion
Employees can and must be accorded all of the protections to which they are entitled, and treated like the valuable assets they are for the organization. By maintaining professional hiring standards, thoroughly documenting performance and accommodations, and taking all employee complaints seriously, HR departments can significantly reduce their organization's legal exposure while fostering a fairer and more productive workplace.
References
2020 top 11 actions by employers that cause lawsuits. (2020, March 13). CahrServices. https://www.cahrservices.com/2020-top-actions-by-employers-cause-lawsuits/
5 best practices for avoiding HR lawsuits. (2015, April 13). PayChex. https://www.paychex.com/articles/human-resources/5-best-practices-for-avoiding-hr-lawsuits
Meinert, D. (2014, June 24). Be fair, be consistent, avoid lawsuits. SHRM. https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-news/pages/be-fair-be-consistent-avoid-lawsuits.aspx
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.