This paper examines leadership and management principles through two lenses. The first is an interview-style exploration of autocratic leadership in a teaching hospital setting, addressing management style, employee expectations, communication, and the relationship between autocratic control and innovation. The second section defines and analyzes core management concepts including transformational leadership, the planning process, decision-making, diversity management, organizational culture, employee motivation, strategic human resource management, and Total Quality Management (TQM). Together, these sections provide a practical and theoretical overview of how managers lead, plan, and sustain organizational performance.
The following is a simulated interview exploring leadership style and management practice in a medical facility context.
Q: What description would best characterize your management style — autocratic, permissive, or somewhere in between?
I would say that my style is almost entirely autocratic. In a medical facility, you cannot give employees very much leeway with regard to their tasks, for several reasons. First, people's lives are at stake. Second, we have tight budgets from the state to work with. Third, because we are a teaching hospital, we have a lot of relatively inexperienced staff who have not yet earned leeway through experience. Because of these factors, management needs to take as much control over operations as possible in order to provide the best service for our patients and the best results for the state.
Q: Within this style, how do you ensure employees meet expectations?
We clearly define every role. Employees know exactly what is expected of them, so that all they need to do is fill that role. We measure their output against the expected output, which allows us to identify and remedy problems. The most important thing is that employees understand their role clearly, because it keeps them from improvising in ways that could be harmful.
Q: When there are problems, how do you remedy them?
Employees all know from the outset what the consequences of failure are. We enforce those consequences strictly. We have to operate this way because people's lives depend on our ability to meet expectations. Deviations from expectations can result in lost lives, compromised health, lawsuits against the state, and other catastrophic consequences. We have a variety of mechanisms to correct deviations from expectations and we use them when needed.
Q: How would you characterize your relationship with your employees?
People sometimes make the mistake of thinking that autocratic leaders are not on good personal terms with their workers. That is not the case at all. I know my employees very well; I know their families and their needs. Communication is very important to what we do — we are a team here. I also have consequences to face if I do not meet the expectations placed on me by my own superiors.
Q: How does communication take place?
Communication comes in a wide variety of forms. We communicate informally, which helps build rapport and teamwork. We also have a number of formal communication structures. These reinforce chains of authority, but they also ensure that employees are aware of everything that is going on. In this business, knowledge is critical to success.
Q: Lastly, do you feel that the autocratic style stifles innovation?
I think it does, but I also feel that innovation is not our primary role. We follow set procedures to improve people's health. Those procedures have been proven over time, and failure to follow them can have drastic consequences. As a teaching hospital, our role is to transmit established knowledge, not to generate new knowledge. There are other places within the healthcare system that are set up for that function. For our strategic mission, innovation is not that important, so leadership here is more geared toward delivering consistent results.
Management is the process of allocating and directing resources in order to achieve a specific outcome. This function is critical in organizations because, without it, resources will be spent without achieving intended outcomes. Managers use a variety of techniques to deploy resources effectively and efficiently, including leadership, delegation, planning, motivating, and decision-making.
Leadership is the process by which managers inspire and motivate others to perform at a higher level than they normally would. Leaders are effective when employees improve their output or efficiency. Leaders are ineffective when employees decrease output, lack job clarity, or become less efficient in their work.
"Steps for sound decisions and managing diversity"
"How culture and goals drive employee performance"
"HR competitive advantage and TQM implementation barriers"
You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.