This paper evaluates two Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) cloud solutions — IBM and Demandware — in the context of small business human resources departments. It examines IBM's broad portfolio of over 100 applications and its customization capabilities alongside the higher fixed costs and longer implementation timelines that can disadvantage smaller organizations. The paper then contrasts IBM with Demandware's leaner, more specialized cloud-based approach, which offers faster deployment and lower subscription costs. Finally, the paper addresses strategies for mitigating implementation risks, particularly the importance of backup systems when transitioning to new platforms.
Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) has emerged as a critical tool for human resources departments of all sizes. The choice between large-scale providers and more specialized vendors involves weighing cost, implementation complexity, breadth of features, and flexibility — considerations that are especially significant for small businesses with limited budgets and IT resources.
IBM is well known for its diversified product offerings and unparalleled scale with regard to SaaS solutions. It is highly regarded as one of the top cloud providers in the market. The HR department of a small business has the ability to leverage IBM's extensive expertise and reach. By working with many small and large businesses, IBM can customize solutions to the specific needs of any HR department. IBM offers over 100 applications ranging from analytics and workforce analysis to employee engagement. Each application is designed to maximize HR potential and efficiency regardless of business size, and IBM's depth allows it to provide catered, customized solutions for each client.
Despite its robust product portfolio, IBM currently requires a significantly higher fixed-cost investment than many competitors. Many of IBM's products require lengthy start-up times to install and properly implement. The lag between purchase and actual implementation can be a hindrance for small businesses. In addition, the larger set-up associated with implementation often results in higher costs that small businesses may find difficult to absorb compared to their larger, more financially secure counterparts.
For these reasons, small businesses often elect to use niche or specialized SaaS offerings. These niche providers are more nimble and flexible while also delivering services at a much lower cost. In many instances, businesses must choose between the higher costs and greater breadth of service offered by IBM or the cheaper, more specialized services offered by competitors.
A smaller but considerably more nimble SaaS solution is offered by Demandware. Demandware provides a more streamlined approach to its cloud-based offerings compared to IBM. With Demandware, HR departments do not have access to IBM's large breadth of applications; instead, this SaaS offering is more specialized and focused in its approach. Demandware generates revenue by creating and servicing clients' e-commerce activities, including online presence, omni-channel integration, and customer relationship management, taking a percentage of sales generated through these channels. With regard to HR specifically, Demandware charges a subscription fee for use.
The offerings are almost entirely cloud-based, which lowers both costs and the lag time between purchase and implementation. However, the company does not have the overall scale that IBM possesses, meaning businesses with complex, enterprise-level HR needs may find Demandware's capabilities insufficient.
"Backup strategies for reducing SaaS transition risks"
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.