This paper outlines the essential design principles of an Incident Command System (ICS) tailored to violent storm disasters, with particular reference to the Australian context. It identifies four core ICS features — command and control, incident objectives, tactical strategy, and adaptive review — and applies them to storm response scenarios. The paper then presents four structured incident objectives: saving human life, preventing further destruction, developing an effective response strategy, and reviewing outcomes for improvement. Drawing on academic literature including Wise (2006) and Born et al. (2007), the paper demonstrates how general emergency management principles can be adapted to the specific challenges posed by large-scale storm disasters.
Any Incident Command System (ICS) must be created and executed for the specific problem at hand. In the scenario of violent storms that reach and destroy so many people and resources throughout Australia every year, an ICS must also be designed to address those very specific problems. The key features of such a system should reflect this adaptation and apply general emergency management principles to the unique circumstances of storm disaster response.
Any ICS will have several key features. The most primary and important of these is establishing some form of command and control. The first arriving authority at the site of a storm disaster should immediately initiate the ICS. A command post equipped with communications and situated in a centrally located position would be beneficial in this case. The command post should be located as close to the disaster site as is logistically possible.
Another key feature of an ICS is, after gathering as much data and information as possible, establishing incident objectives and goals. A clear focus point must be created in order to organize the response effort in a coherent manner. For a storm scenario, the first incident objective is to preserve human life wherever possible. In most storm cases, once the storm has passed, the threat of new incidents is severely diminished and rescue operations should begin as soon as that point is reached.
An ICS must also contain a strategy and a means to tactically employ that strategy. A strong unity of command must be established and followed if these principles are to come to fruition and begin alleviating the incident. As Wise (2006) noted, "hierarchy uses authority to create and coordinate a horizontal and vertical division of labor. Among the advantages of this mode of organization are that it provides a forum for employing large numbers of people and preserves unambiguous accountability for the work that they do." The disaster scene after a storm must be effectively organized in a manner that reflects this principle, enabling responders to deal with the complexity and breadth of a post-disaster environment.
Another key feature of an ICS is the ability to review initial results and adapt toward a better or different solution when circumstances require it. Environmental conditions are always changing, and an effective ICS must be willing to move beyond what has already occurred and look to the present and future for new approaches and resource reallocation. In a storm scenario, priorities should shift to cleanup and hazardous waste removal only after security has been established and all medical emergencies are being properly attended to by appropriate personnel.
The incident commander in a storm disaster scenario must establish important objectives and goals that aim to alleviate the most serious and threatening problems present at the disaster site. The following objectives represent a comprehensive attempt to address the varying challenges of a storm incident.
"Four prioritized objectives for storm incident commanders"
When time becomes available, leaders within the ICS should review and examine the application of their strategy and reevaluate the situation. The design of an ICS for storm disasters must remain adaptive — balancing the immediate imperative of saving lives with the longer-term demands of stabilization, strategic coordination, and ongoing improvement. By following a structured set of objectives and remaining open to revision, incident commanders can maximize the effectiveness of their response in even the most complex and dynamic disaster environments.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.