ICS Deployment by AmeriCorps in Missouri's 2015 Flood Response
This paper provides an overview of the Incident Command System (ICS), a standardized organizational model developed in the 1970s for coordinating multi-agency disaster response. It examines ICS's foundational features, functional areas, documented strengths, and recurring criticisms drawn from scholarly literature. The paper then applies this framework to a real-world case study: the AmeriCorps Disaster Response Team's deployment during the historic Missouri floods of December 2015. It describes operational activities, ICS structural implementation, crew management practices, and lessons learned. The paper concludes with recommendations for improving training, communication, and morale to strengthen future ICS deployments.
- Introduction to the Incident Command System: Definition, purpose, and core features of ICS
- Origins and Scholarly Assessment of ICS: 1970s origins and academic evaluations of ICS
- ICS Strengths, Limitations, and Functional Structure: Pros, cons, and five functional ICS roles
- AmeriCorps Disaster Response Operations in Missouri: AmeriCorps flood relief activities in St. Louis
- ICS Implementation at the Missouri Flood Site: On-site ICS structure, crew rotation, and knowledge sharing
- Conclusion and Recommendations: Lessons learned and future ICS improvement recommendations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It moves logically from conceptual framework to applied case study, grounding abstract ICS principles in the concrete details of the Missouri flood response.
- The paper draws on a diverse range of sources — academic journal articles, government frameworks, and news accounts — lending credibility to both the theoretical and operational sections.
- Specific operational details (e.g., 40,000 sandbags, 270 homes gutted, 82-hour crew rotation cycles) give the case study section quantitative weight and authenticity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of a theoretical framework to evaluate a real-world event. By introducing ICS theory, existing scholarly debates, and documented limitations before turning to the Missouri case, the author creates an analytical lens through which the deployment can be assessed rather than simply described. This "theory-then-application" structure is a standard approach in emergency management and public administration writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a two-section introduction that defines ICS, traces its historical origins, summarizes scholarly literature, and outlines its functional areas and five core roles. A case study section then covers the December 2015 Missouri floods, detailing AmeriCorps operations, the formal ICS structure deployed on-site, crew rotation practices, and informal knowledge-sharing. The conclusion synthesizes lessons learned and offers practical recommendations for future deployments.
Introduction to the Incident Command System
The Incident Command System (ICS) is a standardized organizational model for incident response and management during disasters. The system is composed of standard management and leadership hierarchy procedures, including processes designed to support various types of incidents. It not only respects jurisdictional and agency authority but also supports synchronized efforts among different disaster response and management teams and agencies. ICS enables the fast, effective, and efficient development of universal planning processes and the management of facilities, personnel, communications, and equipment within a common organizational and operational structure. Based on pre-determined standards that involved authorities agree upon, personnel are trained in a common language and set of processes, with tasks assigned to each. The ICS ensures that disaster response teams experience increased organization from the initial phases of a disaster all the way to its conclusion (Lutz and Lindell, 2008).
Origins and Scholarly Assessment of ICS
The ICS was developed in the 1970s by a Southern California- and Arizona-based interagency group. It was created in response to consecutive wildfires that occurred regularly in the region. According to wildfire disaster relief evidence and past efforts in disaster recovery, failure can rarely be attributed to a lack of resources or effort, but rather to a lack of coordination among resources and individuals. Every agency and individual involved in disaster relief has a unique communication process, hierarchy, and operational language. Conflicts and uncertainty surround various non-governmental and governmental organizations regarding resource distribution and authority. The need for a more collaborative and open management system led to the development of ICS and its widespread deployment (Lutz and Lindell, 2008).
As ICS has grown in popularity, it has been increasingly assessed through scholarly studies. According to Lutz and Lindell (2008), inter-organizational coordination of societal efforts in organizing and deploying natural disaster responses is the core purpose of ICS. Bigley and Roberts (2001) identified several factors responsible for the ICS model's success: the shifting of authority as need arises; structuring mechanisms with role switching and system resetting as disaster response requires; the maintenance of standardized rules, tools, and routines; and the deployment of reliable management methods. Cardwell and Cooney (2000) emphasize standardization as the major factor enabling ICS application across and within agencies and organizations.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.