Indian National Congress and India's Independence Movement
This paper traces the history of the Indian National Congress from its founding in 1885 through India's independence in 1947. It examines the ideological divide between the Moderates, who favored gradual constitutional reform, and the Extremists, who demanded complete self-rule. The paper covers key developments including the 1907 Surat split, Tilak's Home Rule Movement, Gandhi's satyagraha and Non-Cooperation Movement, the Rowlatt Act crisis, the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, and the eventual passage of the Indian Independence Act in 1947. Together, these events chart the transformation of the Congress from a deliberative assembly into a mass revolutionary organization.
- Founding of the Indian National Congress: Origins and early sessions of the Congress
- The Moderates and Their Constitutional Approach: Moderate goals, methods, and growing limitations
- Rise of the Extremists and the 1907 Surat Split: Extremist challenge, boycott strategy, and Congress split
- Tilak's Home Rule Movement: Tilak and Besant campaign for self-government
- Gandhi, Satyagraha, and the Non-Cooperation Movement: Gandhi's mass civil disobedience against British rule
- The Quit India Campaign and Independence: Final push for independence and partition in 1947
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It maintains a clear chronological structure that allows readers to follow the evolution of the independence movement from 1885 to 1947 without losing the thread of causation.
- It balances organizational history (the Congress's internal divisions) with political history (British colonial policies), showing how each shaped the other.
- It uses specific names, dates, and events — such as the Surat split of 1907, the Lucknow Congress of 1916, and the Rowlatt Act of 1919 — to ground broad claims in concrete historical detail.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of secondary source citation to synthesize a complex multi-decade historical narrative. By consistently attributing claims to named sources (Indian National Congress 2004, BBC 2007, Edidin 2006), it models how to build an argument from compiled historical accounts rather than primary evidence alone, an approach appropriate for survey-level history writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with the Congress's founding and moves through the Moderate era, the Extremist challenge and Surat split, Tilak's Home Rule Movement, Gandhi's entry into mass politics with satyagraha and non-cooperation, and finally the Quit India campaign and 1947 independence. Each section connects to the next through cause-and-effect logic, showing how earlier ideological conflicts directly shaped later political strategies.
Founding of the Indian National Congress
The Indian National Congress was probably the oldest and the biggest democratic organization in the world (Indian National Congress, 2004). It was the initiative of Allan Octavian Hume, who shared his vision during the 1884 annual convention of the Theosophical Society at Adyar in Madras. A committee was organized to conduct the necessary preparations for a session in Poona the following year. An outbreak of cholera moved the venue of the first session from Poona to Bombay. It was a gathering of 72 delegates — leaders from all parts of India. The Congress was to promote personal intimacy and friendship among all the earnest workers for the country's cause of independence from the British Empire.
After the 1887 session in Madras, an aggressive propaganda campaign was begun among the masses. Hume published a pamphlet through which he appealed to the people of England. The 1889 Congress session in Bombay was held under the leadership of Sir William Wedderburn as president. He was succeeded by Dadabhai Naoroji as president at the 1893 Congress in Lahore (Indian National Congress, 2004).
The Moderates and Their Constitutional Approach
The early congressmen who dominated the Congress from 1885 to 1905 were called the Moderates (Indian National Congress, 2004). They were Indian by birth but British in taste, opinion, morals, and intellect. They supported British institutions and believed in the British concept of justice and fair play. They believed that India needed a balanced and lucid presentation of its needs before the British government and Parliament. The Moderates believed in orderly progress, constitutional agitation, patience, steadfastness, conciliation, and union. They held that constitutional agitation should be pursued within the limits of the law. They also perceived their main task as educating the people, arousing national political consciousness, and eliciting a shared political position on public issues.
The Moderates expressed opposition through the media, submitted petitions to the government and the British Parliament, and asserted influence toward British leaders and the British public. Their memorials and petitions aimed at enlightening the British public about the prevailing conditions in India (Indian National Congress, 2004).
The Moderates also wanted to employ Indians on a massive scale in higher offices of the public services and to establish representative institutions. With the intention of unifying the Indian people, they set up a common political program and waged an agitation campaign against those who failed to pay tariff duties on imports and cotton excise. This agitation made the Indian people realize the true goal and motive of British rule in India. In response, they demanded cheap credit to the peasantry through agricultural banks and widely available irrigation facilities. They also urged changes in the working conditions of plantation laborers and in the prevailing pattern of taxation and expenditure — a system that moved the heavy burden from the rich, especially foreigners, to the poor of India.
For their part, the Moderates blamed the growing poverty and economic backwardness of India on the policies of the British government. They also deplored the prevailing administrative measures and tried to reform the administrative system. They strongly opposed government restrictions on freedom of speech and the press. In 1897, Tilak and other leaders were arrested and imprisoned for inciting disenchantment among the people against the government through their speeches and writing. The Natu brothers of Poona were deported without the benefit of due process or trial. The arrest of Tilak ignited the start of a new phase of the nationalist movement (Indian National Congress, 2004).
The influence of the Moderates, however, was limited to the urban community. Knowing this, they could not effectively challenge foreign rule. Their programs and policies fought for the cause of the Indian population and represented their interests against colonial exploitation. Their aim was to reform the prevailing system of government through peaceful, gradual, and constitutional means. Their influence gradually diminished with the entry of militants who believed in more extreme measures and blamed the Moderates for their faith in British political institutions.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.