This paper examines four foundational strategies in international business: leveraging e-commerce to access global markets, entering foreign markets through intellectual property licensing, using countertrade as an alternative to currency-based transactions, and navigating make-or-buy decisions in global production and outsourcing. Drawing on sources from WIPO, Investopedia, and the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the paper outlines the advantages and risks of each approach. Together, these strategies illustrate how firms of varying sizes can compete internationally by selecting the entry and operational methods best suited to their resources and market conditions.
It is difficult to conceive of a business today that can ignore the availability of e-commerce as a method of connecting with consumers on an international basis. Through a website, a business can easily advertise and make available a wide range of products specifically tailored to a specific country's needs, far beyond what could be available in a brick-and-mortar store recently opened abroad. The full range of products can be made available to the customer simply by virtue of opening a website, and there is no need to bear the expenses of staff and a physical storefront.
"E-Commerce presents opportunities for all consumers and small businesses to obtain easy access to the world market via the Internet. In the past, the world market was readily accessible only to large global companies located mainly in developed countries. E-Commerce is a new and powerful medium which can help close the digital divide among countries and achieve global eQuality in the new world economy" (Towards eQuality, 2013, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry).
There are certain advantages to foreign licensing, namely that the foreign corporation has more knowledge of the government regulations and consumer buying habits of the foreign country. A license also ensures that the company will have a sustained and immediate source of revenue while it attempts to gain a foothold abroad. The company may have no interest in expending resources on actual manufacturing in the foreign country but "could benefit from licensing out of such IP [Intellectual Property] assets by relying on the better manufacturing capacity, wider distribution outlets, greater local knowledge and management expertise of another company," willing to take on the manufacturing burden (Licensing of intellectual property assets: Advantages and disadvantages, n.d., WIPO).
However, there is always the risk that the company which acquires the license will use the knowledge it has gained about the production process to enrich itself by deploying it when manufacturing its own goods and services. There is also concern that the brand's reputation will be damaged through guilt by association if the licensing company engages in careless or unethical conduct.
"Countertrade links exports and imports without hard currency"
"Firms weigh in-house production against outsourcing benefits"
You’re 45% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.