Jomon Period Ceramics: Jar and Deep Vessel Compared
This paper compares two ceramic artifacts from Japan's Jomon period (ca. 10,500–300 B.C.), one of the world's longest-lasting Neolithic cultures. The first artifact, a bulbous jar from the Late Jomon period excavated near Tōhoku, exemplifies the era's shift toward simplicity in form and ornamentation. The second, a deep vessel with handles from the mid-late Jomon period, features an elaborately decorated rim that suggests ritual or ceremonial use. The paper examines similarities and differences in construction technique, decorative style, dimensions, and cultural context, arguing that both artifacts illuminate distinct growth patterns in Japan's early art history and reflect the dynamic of coastal community interaction during a period of significant outward migration.
- History and Background: Overview of Jomon period culture and ceramics
- The Jar: Late Jomon jar: form, decoration, and simplicity
- The Deep Vessel with Handles: Mid-late Jomon vessel: ornate rim and ritual use
- Analysis and Comparison: Similarities and differences between both artifacts
- Cultural and Historical Significance: Migration, community exchange, and art growth
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds each artifact in its specific sub-period of the Jomon timeline, showing awareness of internal chronological distinctions rather than treating the era as monolithic.
- Moves logically from individual artifact description to structured comparison, then to broader cultural interpretation—giving the essay a clear three-part arc.
- Connects material evidence (construction technique, decoration, dimensions) to social and cultural inferences (migration, ritual use, community interaction) without overstating the evidence.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a point-by-point comparative method, systematically identifying both shared features (hand-building with coils, female production, adhesive materials, incised decoration) and contrasting ones (period, height, credit provenance, presence of cord markings). This approach is a standard art-history analytical framework that moves from formal description to contextual interpretation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextual introduction to Jomon culture, then devotes a paragraph to each artifact's formal qualities. A comparison section lists similarities and differences, and a concluding discussion situates both works within the broader story of migration, community exchange, and the growth of assemblage and figurine traditions in Late Jomon art. References follow in a consistent citation format drawn from the Metropolitan Museum of Art's Heilbrunn Timeline.
History and Background
This paper compares two works of art from the Jomon period, one of the longest-lasting Neolithic phases in the history of Japan. The name for this period derives from the "cord markings" characteristic of the ceramics produced throughout it. The people of this era were mainly fishermen or hunters who led semi-sedentary lifestyles, living in pit dwellings primarily surrounded by wide open spaces. The artworks excavated from this period provide monumental insights into the history and inclinations of art during the Jomon era and how they influenced the times to come; however, the artifacts themselves shed very little light on the ethnic structure of the people or their language (Department of Asian Art, 2002).
The Jar
The first artifact is titled Jar. It is a bulbous-shaped bottle with a very small and narrow brim, or neck — a typical representation of the artworks found in the Late Jomon period near excavation sites in Tōhoku. This was the only region at the time that maintained its traditional artistic roots while areas to the south and west were being influenced by foreign patterns. The incisions on the jar also follow traditional lines. The only non-traditional aspect of this artifact is the red pigment applied to its surface. The simplicity of this piece is a fitting representation of the preferences of Japanese artists at the time — a decreasing interest in embellished sculpture and wide-ranging decorative patterns, replaced by a greater eye for form, inclusiveness, and restrained ornamentation.
The Deep Vessel with Handles
The memorable shape of the rim of this artifact makes it stand out among works of the mid-late Jomon period. Although the rim is heavily inclined toward ornamentation of the highest order, the remainder of the vessel presents a stark contrast of simplicity and highlights the traditional cord markings typical of the era. This artifact also broke the mold of ceramics used merely for cooking or other practical purposes. In fact, it shows little practical utility owing to its flamboyant rim, and may instead have served a ritual or cultural function.
Analysis and Comparison
Some of the similarities between the two Jomon artifacts include the fact that both were handmade without the use of wheels or other mechanical instruments; in fact, both were built using coils of clay. Both artifacts were produced by women, as was typical for all Neolithic cultures. Adhesives such as lead, fiber, and crushed shells were used in both to bind the materials smoothly together (Department of Asian Art, 2002). Both earthenware works are categorized as ceramics and feature incised decorations.
Several differences also distinguish the two works. The Jar dates from the later end of the Jomon period, while the Deep Vessel with Handles is from the mid-late Jomon period. Their provenance records also differ considerably: the Jar carries a lengthy credit line (The Harry G. C. Packard Collection of Asian Art, Gift of Harry G. C. Packard, and Purchase, Fletcher, Rogers, Harris Brisbane Dick, and Louis V. Bell Funds, Joseph Pulitzer Bequest, and The Annenberg Fund Inc. Gift, 1975), while the Deep Vessel with Handles has a shorter one (Gift of Florence and Herbert Irving, 1992). The two artifacts also differ in height: the Jar stands at 20 cm, while the Deep Vessel reaches 33 cm. Finally, the Deep Vessel with Handles bears the cord markings typical of the Jomon period, while the Jar does not.
These two artworks were selected because they highlight different growth patterns in the making of artifacts throughout Japan's early art history. Both also illuminate the typical cultural preferences and artistic inclinations of the region at the time. Notably, neither artifact shows any foreign influence, making them representative of an indigenous aesthetic tradition.
References
Deep Vessel with Handles. Accessed March 29, 2018, from: https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/1975.268.184/
Department of Asian Art. "Jomon Culture (ca. 10,500–ca. 300 B.C.)." In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/jomo/hd_jomo.htm (October 2002).
Jar. Accessed March 29, 2018, from: https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/1992.252.1/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.