This research paper investigates the challenges managers encounter when leading multi-cultural teams and identifies practices that effectively counter those challenges. Drawing on scholarship in cross-cultural management, organizational behavior, and global business, the paper examines language barriers, communication style differences, contrasting attitudes toward hierarchy and individualism, and the limits of cognitive information-processing. It then considers managerial strategies—including language education, boundary spanning, and the development of a "third culture"—that foster team cohesion. The paper argues that when managers proactively address these challenges, tangible benefits emerge, including greater innovation, improved productivity, enhanced competitiveness, and stronger employee commitment.
The paper demonstrates thematic literature synthesis: rather than summarizing each source in isolation, it groups evidence from multiple authors under shared themes (language barriers, communication styles, team boundary spanning) and shows how each source contributes to a cumulative argument. This technique is especially visible in the Literature Review, where contrasting findings from longitudinal studies and management articles are woven together to build toward the hypothesis confirmation.
The paper opens with a motivating epigraph and a problem statement before articulating a primary research question, three sub-questions, and a testable hypothesis. A thematic literature review follows, organized around challenges, managerial responses, and cohesion benefits. The discussion of findings synthesizes the reviewed evidence, and the conclusion ties the findings back to the original hypothesis. This introduction–literature review–discussion–conclusion arc is a standard graduate research-paper format and is executed consistently throughout.
"Without taking the time to fully understand how to manage the integration of employees from different cultures, companies risk losing the opportunity to create the international dream team." — Declan Mulkeen (2008, ¶ 2)
When a manager fails to speak a parent company's native language, this may hamper his or her advancement and perhaps his or her ability to complete the job. Similarly, when an individual does not effectively resolve challenges that arise when managing a multi-cultural team, the team's effectiveness, as well as needed advancements, may be compromised. Yadong Luo, PhD, and Oded Shenkar, PhD (2006), stress: "In the middle of a diverse community, language is a key ingredient in this process" (¶ 1). Language is one of the primary challenges to managing multi-cultural teams and may negatively or positively affect organizational processes, the way the organization exchanges information, how it conducts competitive activities, its global coordination, and possibly its intra-corporate value creation. This research paper examines practices managers may utilize to best counter challenges to managing multi-cultural teams.
The primary research question guiding this study is: What practices may managers utilize to best counter challenges to managing multi-cultural teams? Three sub-questions provided the framework for answering this primary question:
1. What challenges routinely arise in managing contemporary multi-cultural teams?
2. What practices may managers implement to overcome challenges in managing multi-cultural teams?
3. What benefits may arise from nurturing positive multi-cultural team cohesion?
The hypothesis for this paper asserts: When managers implement positive practices to counter challenges that multi-cultural teams present, then a number of benefits naturally materialize.
Nicole Johnson-Reece (2004), Vice President of Diversity and Community Involvement at Cendant Corporation's Hotel Group, purports that to survive in any competitive environment, organizations must routinely adapt to changes in the marketplace. In her article "Developing an Inclusive Marketing Strategy," Johnson-Reece points out that one primary change occurring over the preceding decade was in consumer behavior, noting that "The U.S. Census Bureau notes that American businesses are increasingly competing for the dollar of a much more culturally diverse consumer segment than ever before" (¶ 1). In turn, organizations need to re-evaluate themselves and recognize the opportunity inherent in growing a multi-cultural customer base. This critical factor of evaluating and recognizing needs extends to managing today's culturally diverse workforce.
According to the Business Wire report "New Joint Venture Focuses on IT Workforce and Cross-Cultural Teams" (2007), for productivity to improve in today's culturally diverse workforce, organizations must counter a number of multi-cultural challenges. This requires that organizations "deliver custom training to address diversity and cross-cultural sensitivities for businesses that have multi-cultural teams working together on projects" (¶ 2). When managers do effectively counter such challenges, the resulting well-functioning diverse teams contribute to increased innovation and productivity in the organization.
Declan Mulkeen (2008), marketing director at culture and communication skills consultancy Communicaid, examines ways miscommunication may impact an organization. He proposes a number of steps managers may initiate to reduce misunderstanding and increase efficiency. Due to advances in information technology that facilitate global expansion in an increasingly interconnected world, Mulkeen stresses that organizations which succeed learn how to communicate effectively not only with their clients but also with their teams.
This literature review utilizes a thematic organization to address the paper's research questions. The three themes are: (1) Challenges in Managing Multi-Cultural Teams; (2) Overcoming Challenges in Managing Multi-Cultural Teams; and (3) Multi-Cultural Team Cohesion Benefits.
Luo and Shenkar (2006) explain that when the numerous, geographically dispersed subunits of a multinational corporation (MNC) communicate with their local business communities and within their networks, language matters: "Language can have an impact on conflict management in cross-cultural teams, headquarters-subsidiary relations, training effectiveness, knowledge transfer and diffusion, and the efficiency of the global value chain" (¶ 2). Language, in fact, constitutes the primary tool through which MNC executives develop their strategies and policies, disseminate them, and implement them.
Managers routinely minimize a problem's complexity to more manageable levels. Dr. Sheh Seow Wah (2007), a management consultant, identifies eight challenges to making correct decisions, noting that the majority of individuals "can only comprehend or handle seven pieces of information at any point in time. This limited cognitive capability and information-processing capacity results in managers being unable to fully comprehend the issue or problem" (¶ 4). An expansion of the adage "two heads are better than one," Wah suggests, may also aptly capture the idea that the collective ideas of a cohesive team are more productive than those of a team fragmented by multi-cultural challenges.
Dr. Ricarda Bouncken and Viviane Winker (2008) define the term "multi-cultural team" as teams possessing diverse cultural values and communication styles arising from their members' affiliations to varying nationalities and socialization within diverse cultural backgrounds. In their study "Global Innovation Teams: Cultural Team Composition, Language Capacities, and Experience as Success Factors," these researchers note that attention to team functioning has increased as global companies utilize teams to pursue innovation research. To gain efficient access to consumer and market knowledge, global innovation firms frequently rely on Multi-Cultural Innovation Teams (MCITs), whose members come from a variety of national backgrounds. Bouncken and Winker conducted a two-year longitudinal study on five MCITs (105 interviewees) at a large consumer goods company, focusing on diversity in communication styles and values and their effects on team dimensions linked to innovativeness. From their work, they derived a model emphasizing the building of high-quality teamwork: "These teams are developed to merge the different knowledge and opinions of members from various international backgrounds and thus to increase the innovations' appeal to foreign and global markets" (¶ 3).
National cultures, Bouncken and Winker (2008) observe, influence the behavior, cognitive models, and values of the individual. These same cultures may also generate challenges to understanding and to working relationships. Diversity in team members' backgrounds may increase creativity; nevertheless, team functioning remains a significant factor in producing the desired outcome of innovation. When diversity begins to threaten group processes, it may in turn undermine creativity and obstruct the implementation of innovation. A manager who fails to include all team members in the decision-making process, or who allows particular individuals to dominate discussions, increases the potential for challenges within the multi-cultural team. When team members do not participate in team decision-making, their commitment to the team's tasks — and consequently to the organization — decreases.
Through the moderating influence of language and past intercultural experience, numerous diversity studies indicate that considering ethnic diversity within only one country yields only limited potential for translating findings into practice. Moreover, team research that considers only college students may not prove applicable to employees in international firms, who possess far greater cultural experience. Bouncken and Winker (2008) conclude that teams with identical degrees of national diversity may hold varying degrees of cultural diversity and, as a result, function differently.
In "How Diversity Makes a Team Click," Kelley Holland (2007) concurs that multicultural teams may be particularly challenging to manage. Along with language barriers, communication styles frequently differ across cultures, as may traditional views relating to hierarchy and decision-making. "The potential for misunderstanding, bungled efforts and ill will is enormous" (Holland, 2007, ¶ 6). Success follows from understanding and accepting the differences within a multicultural team and then utilizing those differences to enhance the way the team evaluates issues, situations, and concerns before making decisions.
Timothy D. Golden and John F. Veiga (2005) assert in their study "Spanning Boundaries and Borders: Toward Understanding the Cultural Dimensions of Team Boundary Spanning" that boundary spanning may constitute a critical competitive challenge for multicultural teams in the contemporary globalized economy. Deliberate efforts by a team to communicate frequently with individuals outside the team — to promote the team, obtain resources, and protect it from outside interference — are known as team boundary spanning. As cross-cultural teams rapidly increase in number, managers must understand the cultural orientations of each team member in order for boundary spanning to function effectively within the organization.
As individuals make up teams and each brings personal assumptions and preferences shaped by different life experiences and cultural backgrounds, Golden and Veiga (2005) note that "members develop team-level strategies for interacting with their environment such as choosing to boundary span or not" (Aggregating Team section, ¶ 1). The collective assumptions and preferences of individual team members are ultimately reflected in the team's general approach to its organizational environment.
Golden and Veiga (2005) further state that the actions a team adopts will likely reflect the views of its majority of members; however, "as the vast and growing cross-cultural research has shown, team actions are likely to be greatly complicated by the individual cultural differences of its members" (Aggregating Team section, ¶ 1). Although cultural differences may also exist within countries, national cultural values tend to vary more systematically across cultures than within a single culture.
Despite technological advances, the emergence of new markets, and unprecedented levels of migration, Mulkeen (2008) asserts that neither governments nor organizations have invested sufficient time in learning how to harness the opportunities that the new multicultural working and social environment presents. Unless an organization invests time in understanding how to best manage the integration of employees from different cultures, it risks losing the opportunity to create an effective international team.
Mulkeen (2008) notes that prior to the advent of multicultural workforces, mono-cultural teams constituted the norm. Excluding slight variations in personal communication style, "each team member shared the same cultural background and understood the rules of engagement. Each employee would know how to relate to his or her colleagues and work towards a common goal" (Mulkeen, 2008, ¶ 3). With the shift from mono-cultural to multicultural teams, however, managers and individual team members alike face unique challenges, including differing forms of communication and unfamiliar business cultures.
The manager's role, Mulkeen (2008) explains, is to nurture effective collaboration in the working environment so the team may achieve its desired goals. Because multicultural team members may each hold different ideas about how to manage tasks and projects, leading a team comprising numerous nationalities differs dramatically from managing a mono-cultural team. "A truly effective manager takes the time to understand his or her staff and will gradually adopt a 'third' culture: a new set of styles and processes which combine the cultural preferences pertinent to those in the team and find the best fit for the group" (Mulkeen, 2008, ¶ 6). This process involves the manager identifying and understanding the impact of each individual's communication style.
Mulkeen points out a principal difference in communication style — whether a culture is "high" or "low" context. Cultures vary in the extent to which the context of communication is implicit or explicit, which also influences the value placed on relationships versus rules. In a high-context culture (found in countries such as Spain, Mexico, and France), communication relies on body language and assumed knowledge, leaving context implicit. Conversely, in a low-context culture (found in countries such as Germany, Canada, the UK, and the USA), communication is much more direct and words are used to explain context explicitly (Mulkeen, 2008, ¶¶ 7–8).
To avoid causing offense or misunderstanding when a person from a high-context culture communicates with someone from a low-context culture, a degree of accommodation or adaptation is required. A person from a low-context culture may feel that a high-context colleague is withholding information, since the high-context individual assumes all members share the same background knowledge. Conversely, a high-context individual may feel patronized or bored by the level of detail offered by a low-context counterpart. An international team manager must be cognizant of these and other challenges and secure effective solutions to minimize conflict and maximize successful group communication (Mulkeen, 2008).
One primary difference in business practices across cultures involves the degree of emphasis placed on the individual versus the group. The tension between individualism and collectivism — individualism being more prominent in countries such as the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany, and collectivism more prominent in countries in the Middle East as well as Singapore and Mexico — may affect the way individuals perceive their roles within a team. To effectively counter this challenge, expectations regarding each team member's role must be mutually understood from the outset (Mulkeen, 2008).
Mulkeen (2008) asserts that attitudes toward risk, hierarchy, collectivism, individualism, and communication styles represent a few vital areas that the competent multicultural team manager must regularly address. Cross-cultural competency proves to be an essential characteristic for managers in multinational companies; whether or not a manager possesses this trait may make the difference between an organization succeeding or failing in today's global economy. With a myriad of differences to consider, the manager must determine which strategy for managing diverse individuals works best while simultaneously creating an effective framework within which every person feels comfortable.
Overcoming language barriers, Luo and Shenkar (2006) conclude, proves vital, as the strategic and socializing roles of language constitute a key to both local adaptation and global integration. Language proficiency serves as a critical organizational capability: in a global business environment, cross-cultural communication and foreign language ability constitute a competitive imperative. Consequently, organizations benefit when they facilitate language education and proficiency for team managers.
Luo and Shenkar (2006) identify several ways in which global language design benefits organizational performance:
This research confirms the paper's central hypothesis: when managers implement positive practices to counter the challenges that multi-cultural teams present, a number of benefits naturally materialize. These benefits include increased productivity and innovation, enhanced organizational competitiveness, greater flexibility, and stronger employee commitment.
You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.