This paper analyzes Mary Chesnut's Civil War diary—originally written between 1861 and 1865 and awarded the Pulitzer Prize upon its 1982 republication—as a psychosocial portrait of elite Southern womanhood during the war. Drawing directly from Chesnut's first-hand observations, the paper examines the complexity of relationships between slaveholders and enslaved people, the pervasive hypocrisy within Southern society and between North and South, and the devastating personal and economic toll the war exacted on all classes. The analysis argues that Chesnut's diary transcends mere chronicle to become what the author calls a "memoir in humanity," revealing moral complexity, genuine empathy, and rich character beneath the surface of a deeply unjust society.
The study of the Civil War typically entails a study of battles and skirmishes on the battlefield. As a result, when most of us think of this time in history, we forget that there was a civilian life lived through the war. Mary Chesnut's diary, as originally written between the years of 1861 and 1865 under the title A Diary from Dixie, provides critical insight into a perspective that many students of the Civil War fail to recognize. She offers an illuminating glimpse into the struggles of an elite woman living through the Civil War, slavery, and an uncertain time in the privileged South (Chestnut). Upon its republication in 1982, this remarkable piece of literature was recognized for its insight and literary contribution to our understanding of a complex era, winning the Pulitzer Prize. From reading of her struggles and her journey, we learn on a psychosocial level that even among the elite women who owned slaves, there was a sense of humanity and empathy, as well as a dynamic and poignant relationship between slaves and their owners. All of this had a profound impact upon Mary Chesnut, as she eloquently describes the humanity, the hypocrisy, and the character beneath the privileged exterior in which she lived.
We see the complexity of the women of privilege through their humanity, and through the anguish and pain they, too, were forced to endure. A friend of Mary's wants her husband to fight in the war because he beats her at home (Chestnut 11). We see how the slaves of Mrs. Chesnut consider her a matriarch and do not want to be dispersed to work elsewhere, having developed a real connection to her and come to rely upon her much as one might rely upon extended family (22). We also see how the privileged women love and respect many of their slaves and treat them as extended family. One woman, for instance, quotes the wisdom of her Black nurse to another woman in an effort to offer words of wisdom and solace (79).
Moreover, in the poignant words of Mrs. Chesnut, we glimpse the empathy that even a woman of privilege can feel toward other women in circumstances starkly different from her own. Mrs. Chesnut must sit down when she witnesses a Black woman on the auction block. She likens her to "good little Nancy" and sadly alludes to the fact that this woman's fate rests in the hands of the man who buys her (13). A Southern man enters a room of Southern politicians and reminds them that in the North, people are regarded as human beings there too (19). Mrs. Chesnut listens attentively and supports Maria Whitaker, a "good colored" woman who deserved better than to be left with three children and falsely accused of adultery by her husband (45). We also see empathy extended to wives and children on the opposing side, as Mrs. Chesnut soulfully describes the letters of men and women in the North: "One might shed tears over some of the letters. Women, wives, and mothers, are the same everywhere" (90).
We see how the Bible can be invoked to promote the mistreatment of women and the institution of slavery. Mrs. Chesnut remarks, mimicking a promoter of slavery she calls Sterne: "You know what the Bible says about slavery and marriage; poor women! Poor slaves!" She then comments: "Sterne, with his starling — what did he know? He only thought, he did not feel" (13). While some certainly believe in and act upon the poor treatment of both women and enslaved people, we also see men of power who praise other men in power for refusing to support politically any man who is known at home to beat his wife (17).
"Evolving bonds between enslaved people and owners"
"Contradictions within the South and North-South conflict"
"Economic ruin and human suffering across classes"
Through Mrs. Chesnut's eyes, we also witness the pain of soldiers returning from the North: "I was deeply moved. These men were so forlorn, so dried up, and shrunken, with such a strange look in some of their eyes; others so restless and wild-looking; others again placidly vacant, as if they had been dead to the world for years" (301). This passage stands as one of the diary's most affecting depictions of the human cost of the Civil War on those who survived it.
In Mary Chesnut's own words, she was a "tolerably close observer" of "men and manners." Society was, as she eloquently surmised, "only an enlarged field for character study" (338). Through her words, recorded from first-hand experience, we see that the battle between North and South was more than a clash of binary opposites. Within the South itself, there were the privileged as well as those without privilege; there were the whites as well as the enslaved. What Mary Chesnut accomplishes, however, is to make these categories fall by the wayside. In their place, we see human beings composed of far more than simple "good" or "bad." We see relationships that are complex and, sometimes, even heartwarming in places where many of us would not expect warmth to exist—such as within the slave-owner relationship itself. She penned more than just a diary; she penned a memoir in humanity.
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.