This paper examines literary minimalism as defined by John Barth in his essay "A Few Words about Minimalism," then applies Barth's framework to two short stories: Peter Meinke's "The Cranes" and Annie Proulx's "55 Miles to the Gas Pump." Drawing on Barth's principles — including Henry James's "show, don't tell" maxim, stripped-down vocabulary, non-emotive tone, and the power of omission — the paper demonstrates how each story constructs vivid, emotionally resonant narratives through deliberate brevity. Close readings of specific passages reveal how minimalist technique allows readers to infer meaning, expand on sparse details, and engage actively with the text.
The paper exemplifies theory-to-text application: it establishes a critical vocabulary (stripped-down syntax, non-emotive tone, "show don't tell") from a secondary source and then uses that vocabulary as a lens for primary-text analysis. This approach allows every quoted passage to serve double duty — illustrating both the author's craft and the theoretical claim.
The paper opens with a definition section that introduces Barth's essay and states the thesis. Two body sections follow, each dedicated to one short story and organized around specific textual evidence tied back to Barth's principles. A brief conclusion synthesizes the findings. This three-part body-plus-frame structure is well suited to comparative literary analysis at the undergraduate level.
Minimalism certainly means using fewer words to express thoughts, plots, ideas, and action, but there is more to it than that, according to John Barth. By invoking Henry James's mantra of "show, don't tell," Barth covers the subject very well. Barth also quotes Edgar Allan Poe, who wrote that "…undue length is…to be avoided." The short story itself is an example of minimalism, simply because it condenses the components of a novel into a much shorter space. There are writers who specialize in what Barth calls "luxuriant abundance" and in "extended analysis," which is clearly the opposite of minimalism; he mentions Guy de Maupassant and Anton Chekhov as "masters of terseness" (Barth, 1986).
Because Barth uses examples of well-known writers, he certainly could not omit Ernest Hemingway, whose short stories were very tight and yet very expressive with fewer, well-chosen words and phrases. "You could omit anything…and the omitted part would strengthen the story and make people feel something more than they understood" (Barth). Creating minimalist fiction means using "stripped-down vocabulary… [and] a stripped-down rhetoric" that reduces figurative language, Barth writes. He extols the virtues of "super-short stories" — such as the two stories analyzed below.
Thesis: Learning to write effectively without an overload of descriptive phrases or adjectives, and learning to say more with less by showing rather than telling, is the crux of the matter when it comes to minimalism.
In Peter Meinke's short story, the author lets the reader know — through minimal narrative — that the two people watching whooping cranes are not well-to-do and that they are old. The "shower curtain spread over the front seat" is a very short but clear indication that the seat is likely tattered or torn, or otherwise not suitable for sitting on without a cover. Since seat covers are available at auto supply stores and are probably not cheap, a reader can assume this was a cost-cutting measure on the couple's part.
Readers understand that the couple has been in an accident and that they are caught in some kind of health difficulty, which probably includes psychological problems. "I could use a few clowns" is a telling admission that the man is depressed or otherwise struggling (Meinke, 1987). He cannot get up stairs and is restricted in what he can eat or drink — and smoking is off-limits. Just how serious is his health? A reader naturally wonders. Less explanation (minimalism) allows the reader's mind to expand on what is being read.
The woman stands by him and likes to hear his voice, yet there is a strong sense of sadness. The personification of the cranes — their feathers are falling out and their offspring never write — leads the reader to believe that the couple's own children are estranged from them. Birds' offspring certainly do not write to their parents, and readers can infer that the man is losing his hair, either from cancer treatments or advanced old age. "Never got tired of listening to you…" suggests things are drawing to an end (Meinke). She is summing up the past, and instead of "never get tired," Meinke uses "got" because it is past tense — this couple seems to be past tense. Show, don't tell, Barth insists, and that is exactly what this dialogue is doing.
Readers know the couple had genuine intimacy when they were younger. He says she was "terrific in ways I couldn't tell the kids about," and this adds to the melancholy of the situation (Meinke). All these small statements accumulate so that the reader understands they are very old and simply being sentimental, using the cranes as a way to deflect their thoughts from their own decline. He wears a hearing aid but did not bring it; he says he can "…hardly hear anything anyway," yet he did hear smaller birds squabbling — so we understand that exaggeration is part of getting old (Meinke).
The juxtaposition in the last two sentences — the cranes lift off towards the sun, but the car is "sinister" — is Meinke's way of adding drama and grief without using many words. The car may be an old VW ("beetle-like"), its paint burned off by the sun, seen in "metallic isolation." The story possesses the quality Barth described as "stripped-down vocabulary," because simple, short phrases — such as when he kissed her "barely touching her lips" — carry the emotional weight. Very old, very tired people may miss with their kisses (Meinke).
Given John Barth's essay and the two very short stories examined here, the advantages and literary strengths associated with minimalism come across very clearly. Meinke and Proulx both demonstrate that carefully chosen, spare language — guided by the principle of showing rather than telling — can convey character, emotion, and narrative complexity as powerfully as any more expansive prose style.
Barth, John. "A Few Words about Minimalism." The New York Times, 1986.
Meinke, Peter. "The Cranes." In Literature to Go. New York: Macmillan, 2010. pp. 192–194.
Proulx, Annie. "55 Miles to the Gas Pump." In Literature to Go. New York: Macmillan, 1999.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.