This paper examines key tax planning considerations for H&M, a Swedish multinational retail clothing corporation with significant operations in the United States and globally. The analysis covers the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on international commercial operations, the comparative merits of separate transactions versus profit-and-loss accounting methods, and strategic structural recommendations for optimizing tax efficiency across H&M's global supply chain. The paper further explores outbound and inbound transaction characterization under U.S. tax law, methods for alleviating double taxation through bilateral treaties, and the effective use of the U.S. foreign tax credit. Together, these topics illustrate the complexity of international tax management and the expertise required to navigate it successfully.
The impact of currency values on commercial operations is a familiar topic for the international accountant. Much of the attraction of currency markets stems from their synthesis of all aspects of the world economy into a single, digestible value. The significance of relative currency values rests primarily on their relationship to world markets and their interaction with international trade, investment, and monetary practices. A given exchange rate, viewed in isolation, may at first appear to be little more than an abstraction, yet it exercises a significant influence on commercial relations as a pricing mechanism affecting every international transaction.
The impact of exchange rate fluctuations on domestic aggregates can also affect the course of economic activity to the point that a sense of urgency is reached when dealing with volatile markets. As long as currencies remain the medium of exchange for commercial transactions, market fluctuations of relative currency values will continue to attract the attention of the investor, the banker, the speculator, and the policy maker alike. This paper examines the tax planning logic for H&M, a large multinational retail clothing corporation based in Sweden with a significant presence in the United States.
Operating in multiple currencies has a significant impact on H&M's tax liability. Currencies are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations to the extent that they are used to conduct transactions with external markets. The greater the proportion of currency exchanges to total monetary transactions for a given market, the greater the exposure to changes in exchange rates. Commercial operations conducting international trade are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations in proportion to their total volume of transactions (Lymer and Hasseldine, 2002). As the magnitude of currency transactions increases relative to aggregate transactions, a business unit realizes greater exposure to exchange rate fluctuations.
The transactions approach to exchange exposure has gained prominence in recent years. A lingering preoccupation with currency translation for the measurement of operating performance, however, has tended to divert attention away from productive commercial activity toward disingenuous, if flashy, hedging techniques. A skilled money manager can still generate significant cash gains from currency hedging without increasing the productive output of a business unit. By defining exposure as the proportion of currency transactions to total transactions, greater management attention can be directed at operating units with a high degree of exposed risk to exchange rate changes (Johnson and Scholes, 2002).
Evaluating operations performance on a global scale demands a shift in perspective toward techniques based on multilateral transactions analysis. An enterprise operating in a single market with single-currency transactions can easily be evaluated in the operations currency, while one engaged in many markets and multiple currencies requires more extensive analysis. Common financial accounting practices require financial positions to be translated at current exchange rates from the operations currency into the reference currency. Despite the need to consolidate financial results on a consistent basis, direct translation at current exchange rates continues to obscure actual operating results when relative currency values fluctuate from period to period (Morrison, 2002). As a result of these fluctuations and their volatility, comparisons over multiple periods become essentially invalid from the perspective of the reference currency.
A recurring theme in the deliberation of multicurrency financial accounting is that a commercial operation should be evaluated from the perspective of the economy in which the unit is located, as measured by the operations currency. This is the fundamental argument for establishing current-rate translation accounting over historical-rate translation methods. Resolving this dichotomy can be an extensive process so long as the need remains to translate the operating results of a corporation for consolidation into a single reference currency (Lymer and Hasseldine, 2002).
Whether H&M should utilize a separate transactions accounting method or a profit and loss accounting method is a critical question. Most large businesses and all governments must operate in at least two currencies to finance their activities. Dual currency accounting formalizes this dependence on multiple currencies by keeping financial records in two currencies. A profit and loss method uses a chart of accounts to manage transactions in multiple currencies. This system is superior in that every transaction is labeled with a currency code, allowing the system to categorize every transaction by the currency it uses and report debits and credits to accounts without the need for a currency exchange transaction.
Profit and loss accounting solves the problem of producing balance sheets with multiple currency accounts by creating as many monthly profit and loss statements as there are currencies used by the business or bank operating the multi-currency accounting system. In dual currency accounting, this is reduced to only two currencies. Banks and businesses need only calculate the exchange position of income less expense for each currency to revalue the foreign exchange in their local currency. One key decision for businesses using dual currency accounting is whether to convert the value of a transaction into the parallel currency in real time or to do so at a specific date.
The task of evaluating performance in multiple currencies extends beyond contemporary financial accounting practices. One approach is to separate the evaluation of operating results from their consolidation. A multi-tier evaluation process then evolves as operations in an external market develop through a cycle from capital investment to normal commercial operations. Ongoing business operations are evaluated in the operations currency, consolidated enterprises from the reference currency, while the return on capital investment is measured in the investment currency (Morrison, 2002).
"H&M's expansion history and recommended tax restructuring"
"U.S. tax rules for outbound and inbound transactions"
"Using foreign tax credits to minimize double taxation"
Tax management planning for a large multinational corporation is no simple matter. The accountant who takes up such a task must have a firm understanding of the currency market, the merits of various accounting methods — such as the separate transactions accounting method versus the profit and loss method — as well as a firm grasp of both the U.S. and host-nation taxation systems. Significant saved profits and improved corporate efficiency can be achieved through a thorough understanding of these important issues.
You’re 41% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.