This paper analyzes the financial performance of New Look Jacket Inc. (NLJ) for the 2012 fiscal year, focusing on variance analysis between budgeted and actual results for its nylon and leather jacket product lines. The paper examines contribution margin, sales volume, sales mix, and direct material variances, identifying the unexpected surge in leather jacket demand as the primary driver of a $170,850 favorable total variance. It then presents a forward-looking budget projection for the next fiscal year, outlining assumptions regarding inflation, demand trends, and economic conditions, and forecasting a net income of $518,419 based on projected sales of 123,500 units.
The paper demonstrates managerial accounting variance decomposition: separating total variance into sales mix, sales quantity, direct material price, direct labor rate, and overhead sub-variances. This layered approach, consistent with cost accounting frameworks, isolates the specific operational and market factors driving the overall favorable outcome.
The paper opens with a brief performance summary, then proceeds through variance analysis organized by category (contribution margin, sales, direct materials, labor). The second half shifts to forward budgeting, presenting assumptions and projected income statement figures. Appendices supply the full numerical tables referenced throughout the narrative, making the document self-contained for both analysis and planning purposes.
New Look Jacket Inc. (NLJ) specializes in the production of nylon jackets and leather jackets. The company delivered strong financial results at the end of the 2012 fiscal year, recording a net income of $417,100 — a figure $170,850 greater than the net income budgeted for that period, despite some operational turbulence. A detailed variance analysis reveals that an external factor was largely responsible for this outcome: the leather jacket market grew far more rapidly than anticipated, requiring NLJ to scale up operations to meet the surge in demand.
Based on the figures in Exhibit 1, the total contribution margin for nylon jackets was $4,350 less than budgeted. Although the actual per-unit contribution margin was $0.15 greater than the standard — owing to lower selling and administrative costs per unit — this gain was insufficient to offset lower sales volume. By contrast, the leather jackets' total contribution margin was $325,200 higher than budgeted. However, the actual per-unit contribution margin for leather jackets was $12.70 less than the standard, reflecting higher variable costs across all business categories. This divergence between total and per-unit contribution margin highlights the critical importance of contribution margin analysis in understanding product-line profitability.
Analysis of sales variance reveals that NLJ recorded actual sales volume of 110,000 units, compared with the budgeted volume of 100,000 units — a favorable variance of 10,000 units. This favorable outcome contributed to an increase in actual sales revenue. The company recorded $5,747,500 in actual revenue compared with the $4,075,000 budgeted, representing a favorable revenue variance of $1,672,500.
Despite the overall favorable sales variance, it was exclusively the leather jacket line that drove this result. The budgeted sales volume for leather jackets was 5,000 units, while the actual sales volume reached 16,500 units — a favorable variance of 11,500 units. In contrast, nylon jacket sales were unfavorable: the budgeted volume was 95,000 units, but actual sales came in at 93,500 units, producing an unfavorable variance of 1,500 units.
Accordingly, the sales mix variance was favorable for leather jackets and unfavorable for nylon jackets. The unexpectedly high demand for leather jackets in 2012 generated a favorable market mix overall for the company. This outcome is consistent with broader patterns observed in sales mix variance analysis, where product lines with higher unit margins can drive disproportionate gains when demand shifts in their favor.
You’re 37% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.