This paper examines the government of Ngo Dinh Diem, Prime Minister of the Republic of Vietnam following the French withdrawal. It analyzes the social base of his administration, which rested largely on his family and Catholic refugees from the North, and evaluates whether his government was genuinely democratic. The paper explores Diem's land reform policies and contrasts them with the National Liberation Front's approach, discusses why the United States initially supported and later sought to remove Diem, and explains what the Buddhist Crisis revealed about his leadership. The paper concludes that Diem's corrupt, prejudiced, and ineffective government ultimately contributed to his downfall and assassination in 1963.
The paper demonstrates analytical synthesis: rather than narrating events chronologically, it organizes its argument around interpretive questions, using specific evidence (the Can Lao party, the Buddhist Crisis, land resettlement failures) to support a coherent evaluative claim about Diem's government.
The paper opens with an introduction establishing Diem's background and the paper's central questions. It then moves through four analytical sections addressing the social base and democratic character of the government, land reform policy comparisons, U.S. motivations, and the Buddhist Crisis. A brief conclusion synthesizes these points into a final evaluative judgment. The bibliography cites two sources in MLA format.
Ngo Dinh Diem was a vehement anti-communist who initially impressed many American leaders, who then supported him as Prime Minister of the Republic of Vietnam after the French withdrew from the country. This paper examines the social base of his government and addresses four central questions: What were the provisions of the land reform Diem implemented, as opposed to the programs implemented by the National Liberation Front in areas under their control? Was the Diem government democratic? Why did the United States install, and later seek to remove, Diem? What did the Buddhist Crisis reveal about the Diem government?
Diem's government was corrupt, and its social base rested primarily on his own family and the Catholic refugees who had fled from the North. This narrow foundation angered most South Vietnamese. Many of his supporters described his government as democratic, but it was not. Diem fixed elections, installed family members in high government positions, and governed in a generally despotic manner. He created the Catholic Can Lao organization as the only legal political party, further alienating Buddhists and other groups within his own country.
One of the most important factors in Diem's growing unpopularity was his land reform policy. His program forcibly removed thousands of peasants from their lands and relocated them into fortified settlements that were supposedly easier to defend against Communist forces. In practice, however, the policy failed to achieve its security objectives while generating enormous resentment among the rural population. By contrast, the National Liberation Front's program distributed land directly to needy peasants, winning significant support in the countryside and highlighting the stark difference between the two competing visions for South Vietnamese society.
Diem's government was corrupt, prejudiced, and had to be removed from power before he destroyed South Vietnam without the help of the Communists. His narrow social base, his suppression of political opposition through the Can Lao party, his failed land resettlement program, his persecution of Buddhists, and his reliance on family patronage all combined to undermine whatever anti-communist purpose his government was meant to serve. The 1963 coup marked the violent end of a government that had alienated nearly every sector of South Vietnamese society.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.