Nursing Shortage and Its Effects on Patient Outcomes
This paper examines the relationship between nursing shortages and patient outcomes in hospital settings, drawing primarily on two peer-reviewed studies published in 2003. The first, published in Nursing Economics by Potter, Barr, McSweeney, and Sledge, analyzes RN staffing levels against measurable patient outcomes such as pain, self-care, and satisfaction in acute care units. The second, published in JONA by Sasichay-Akkadachanunt, Scalzi, and Jawad, investigates nurse-to-patient ratios and in-hospital mortality in Thailand. Together, these studies provide compelling evidence that reductions in professional nursing staff negatively affect patient care, raise ethical concerns, and may ultimately undermine the cost-saving rationale that drives staffing cuts in the first place.
- Introduction: The Cost of Understaffing: RN shortages, costs, and care quality overview
- Defining Patient Outcomes in Nursing Research: How studies define and measure patient outcomes
- Study Findings: RN Staffing and Patient Outcomes: Potter et al. findings on staffing and outcomes
- International Evidence: Nurse Staffing and Mortality in Thailand: Thailand study links staffing ratios to mortality
- Why Nursing Staff Reductions Continue Despite Evidence: Administrative rationale behind continued staffing cuts
- Policy Implications and the Case for Change: Research findings translated into healthcare policy
- Conclusion: Patient Outcomes Over the Bottom Line: Moral and financial case for adequate nursing staff
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its argument in two specific peer-reviewed studies, using direct quotations and defined terms to build a rigorous, evidence-based case rather than relying on anecdote or assertion.
- The paper anticipates counterarguments — particularly the claim that patient condition, not staffing, drives adverse outcomes — and addresses them directly using evidence from the cited studies.
- It connects financial, ethical, and legal dimensions of the nursing shortage, showing how all three reinforce the case for maintaining adequate RN staffing levels.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of comparative analysis, placing two independent studies side by side to argue that their convergent findings suggest universality — across different healthcare systems and national contexts — of the relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. This technique strengthens the argument by showing that findings are not artifacts of a single study design or cultural context.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by framing the problem and its financial drivers, then defines key terms used in the research. It proceeds through the findings of the primary U.S.-based study, introduces international corroborating evidence from Thailand, and then turns from descriptive analysis to prescriptive argument — addressing why cuts persist, what policy changes are needed, and what legal and ethical consequences may follow from ignoring the evidence. The conclusion restates the moral priority of patient outcomes over cost reduction.
Introduction: The Cost of Understaffing
In today's environment of rising costs in the healthcare industry, one of the first casualties in many hospitals is the level of RN staffing. Across the country, hospital RNs are increasingly forced to work in an atmosphere in which they are understaffed, overworked, and charged with responsibilities wholly unrelated to direct patient care. This phenomenon is illustrated in alarming detail in the article Identifying Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcome Relationships: A Guide for Change in Care Delivery, published in the July–August 2003 issue of Nursing Economics, in which a solid connection between inadequate RN staffing and negative patient outcomes is presented.
Most RNs are acutely aware of the negative repercussions they experience personally as a result of understaffing — particularly in acute healthcare units. Most also realize that this understaffing results from the popular administrative notion that the higher the RN percentage in any given facility, the higher hospital costs rise (Potter, Barr, McSweeney, & Sledge, 2003). Although it is true that higher RN concentrations in any given facility necessarily increase costs in the short term, this raises the question of whether, given the detrimental effect that reductions in RN staffing have on patient outcomes, the current definition of "cost" is one-dimensional.
Although it is tempting to weigh financial considerations too heavily in hospital policy decisions — particularly concerning RN staffing — the nature of the hospital as a caring institution must be upheld. Not only is this absolutely essential to defending the quality of healthcare offered to patients, but it is also ultimately more cost-effective in reducing the very real financial repercussions that arise from negative patient outcomes. These include "measures of patient falls, medication errors, self-reported symptom management, self-care and health status, and post-discharge patient satisfaction" (Potter, Barr, McSweeney, & Sledge, 2003). After all, if one factors in the higher costs associated with medication errors, medical complications resulting from inadequate care (such as pressure ulcers and falls), and possible legal action by affected patients — to say nothing of the moral and ethical implications — the actual financial benefit of reduced RN staffing may look very different indeed.
Bibliography
Potter, P., Barr, N., McSweeney, M., & Sledge, J. (2003). Identifying nurse staffing and patient outcome relationships: A guide for change in care delivery. Nursing Economics, 21(4).
Sasichay-Akkadachanunt, T., Scalzi, C., & Jawad, A. (2003). The relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. JONA, 33(9).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.