Obesity in America: One Person's Story and Social Context
This paper examines obesity in the United States through two complementary lenses: a broad sociological background on the causes and demographics of the obesity epidemic, and a firsthand interview with an obese man encountered at a South Florida mall. The background section discusses nutritional quality, farm subsidies, income disparities, and the healthcare costs associated with obesity. The interview narrative follows one man whose journey from active construction worker to disability recipient illustrates how physical injury, depression, and reliance on cheap processed food can accelerate severe weight gain. Together, the two sections demonstrate how macro-level social forces manifest in individual lives.
- Introduction: How and why the subject was selected
- Background on Obesity in America: Statistics, food costs, and healthcare impacts
- Conducting the Interview: Finding a willing subject at the mall
- The Subject's Story: Injury, disability, depression, and weight gain
- Conclusion: Personal story reframes the obesity epidemic
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper combines macro-level research with a specific personal narrative, giving abstract statistics a human face and making the argument more persuasive.
- The author is candid about methodological challenges — approaching a stranger about a sensitive topic — which adds credibility and transparency to the fieldwork.
- The background section is directly connected to the interview findings; details like cheap processed food and disability income resonate clearly in the subject's own story.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates contextualizing primary research within secondary literature. By establishing background facts about obesity rates, farm subsidies, and healthcare costs before presenting the interview, the author frames the subject's personal experience as an illustration of broader social patterns rather than an isolated anecdote. This move — from general to specific — is a standard and effective structure for qualitative fieldwork write-ups.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a methodological introduction explaining how the subject was found and why. A literature-informed background section follows, covering nutrition, demographics, and healthcare costs. The paper then returns to the fieldwork setting, narrating the search for a willing subject before recounting the interview itself. A brief conclusion ties individual experience back to societal context. This five-part arc (rationale → background → method → findings → reflection) is well-suited to short qualitative reports.
Introduction
For this assignment, I interviewed an obese individual from the South Florida area. Finding a suitable subject proved more difficult than expected. It was a challenge not only to identify an appropriate person, but also to approach them without being insulting or making them feel uncomfortable about their condition. Although I am familiar with some obese individuals through my network of friends and family, I chose to select someone I did not know, so there would be slightly less personal pressure to avoid causing offense. Obesity is a sensitive subject for many people, and I was personally concerned that approaching someone within my social network might create awkwardness or tension for those relationships.
To work around this, I tried to frame the interview in a way that focused on "lifestyles" rather than on weight or physical condition directly. This framing, I hoped, would make it easier for an obese person to speak freely. With that in mind, I went to a local mall to find a willing participant. I asked potential subjects whether they would help me with a class assignment by letting me interview them about their lifestyle. This paper provides a background on obesity in American society and then connects that context to the specific information gathered during the interview. The problem of obesity is fascinating on multiple levels — from a societal perspective as well as from the standpoint of the individual.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.