Organizational Motivation Plan to Improve Employee Performance
This paper develops a comprehensive organizational motivation plan for a small manufacturing firm experiencing high defect rates, staff turnover, and low job satisfaction. Drawing on foundational motivational theories — including Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Herzberg's hygiene factors, Taylor's scientific management, Mayo's Hawthorne studies, Adams's equity theory, and Vroom's expectancy theory — the plan proposes complementary strategies covering remuneration packages, bonus schemes, improved management-employee relationships, recognition programs, and performance reviews. The paper also addresses motivation strategies specific to minimum-wage service workers and examines the relevance of the individual worker within organizational settings, concluding with a comparative chart contrasting individual worker traits with team-oriented behaviors.
- Introduction: Problem context and motivation plan rationale
- The Motivation Plan: Remuneration, relationships, recognition, and reviews
- Summary of the Most Important Elements of the Plan: Bonus schemes and communication as top priorities
- Motivating Minimum Wage Service Workers: Intrinsic motivation and promotion for low-wage staff
- The Relevance of the Individual Worker: Individual value versus scientific management depersonalization
- Individual to Teamwork Chart: Comparative traits of individual versus team workers
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds every proposed strategy in a named motivational theory, giving the recommendations academic credibility and logical justification.
- Addresses multiple employee segments — salaried workers, minimum-wage service staff, and individuals versus teams — showing awareness that motivation is not one-size-fits-all.
- Uses a self-funding bonus scheme argument (productivity gains cover the cost of bonuses) as a practical response to anticipated employer resistance, demonstrating real-world applicability.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies applied theory synthesis: rather than describing theories in isolation, it maps each one directly onto a specific workplace problem. For example, Adams's equity theory is invoked to justify wage benchmarking, Herzberg's hygiene factors underpin the bonus design, and Mayo's Hawthorne findings support the management-by-walking-around tactic. This technique shows readers how to move from abstract frameworks to concrete managerial recommendations.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a problem statement framed by the Hawthorne studies, then presents the motivation plan in four sub-sections (remuneration, employment relationship, recognition, and performance review). A summary section distills the two most critical elements. Separate sections then handle minimum-wage workers and individual worker relevance before a comparative chart closes the paper. This layered structure — theory, plan, prioritization, special cases, and visual summary — makes the argument easy to follow at every stage.
Introduction
The development of an organizational motivation plan to improve performance within a company should take into account the different needs of different employees as well as the requirements of the employer. The Hawthorne studies by Mayo indicated that when employees were happy and motivated at work they would work harder and display more positive behavioral traits. If a firm is suffering from symptoms associated with poor motivation — such as poor performance levels — developing a plan to increase motivation may result in desired changes in behavior, especially if the plan is designed with the needs of both employer and employee in mind.
In the case of the firm manufacturing the WooWoo widgets, there are currently several problems. The main symptom is a high level of product defects, which is increasing costs and delaying deliveries. Other issues include high staff turnover, low product and job satisfaction, and poor quality work. A motivation plan may facilitate changes that improve the current situation.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.