This paper examines the critical role of measurement systems in helping organizations achieve their mission, objectives, and goals. Moving beyond traditional production-focused metrics, the paper argues that service measurement is essential for modern businesses. It presents a theoretical framework grounded in Service Dominant Logic (SDL) and proposes six hypotheses for effective service measurement implementation. The paper surveys five key measurement tools—dashboards, Six Sigma, Balanced Scorecard, Performance Prism, and Performance Pyramid—explaining how each can be adapted to measure service quality, employee performance, and organizational alignment. The analysis demonstrates that effective measurement systems provide crucial feedback, enhance employee motivation through consequences and rewards, and enable managers to make data-driven decisions that drive organizational performance.
To ensure that a company's mission statement, objectives, and goals are reached, companies rely on measurement tools. Until recently, these tools were used primarily to measure performance within production-focused businesses. Service was not considered an important part of businesses that sell tangible products; it was viewed as secondary. However, measuring service in both production and service-based companies can determine organizational success or failure.
Measurement tools are now used to improve production processes and to evaluate and control operations. Having performance and service measurements in place allows organizations to make decisions and judgments based on data. Companies can use these tools to compare the performance of departments, teams, and individuals, identifying strengths and areas for improvement across the organization.
Any measurement system's purpose is to provide feedback regarding a company's goals and to help the company reach those goals more effectively. The feedback data a company receives communicates where the organization stands, how well it is performing, and what direction it is taking. Sharing these results with employees can increase motivation, which is another mechanism by which measurement can enhance effectiveness. For the motivational benefits of measurement to be realized, a performance measurement system must include consequences and rewards tied to performance outcomes.
A performance or service measurement system informs managers about employee behavior. Employees may work harder to obtain rewards administered by managers or to avoid negative consequences of low performance and service. Research supports this dynamic: a survey of U.S. counties found that 31.5 percent of respondents agree or strongly agree that performance measurement increased commitment to excellence. The study indicates benefits in focus or motivation for between 32 and 68 percent of respondents (Mausolff & Spence, 2008). These findings suggest that performance measurement enhances performance through multiple mechanisms, including learning and motivation.
The same principle applies to Service-Dominant Logic (SDL), though it takes on a different perspective. Under SDL, an entity cannot be optimized but can be improved upon (Lusch & Vargo, 2006). This distinction is important for understanding how service measurement differs from traditional performance metrics.
Theory: SDL is too difficult to measure due to the intangible and subjective aspects of human beings.
SDL Hypotheses:
Several measurement tools can be adapted for service use. Organizations should understand the strengths and applications of each to select the most appropriate system for their needs.
The most common and simplest form of performance measurement is the dashboard. The dashboard contains important information such as company targets and performance data. These reports can be prepared in spreadsheet format on a monthly or quarterly basis. Managers can access and view specific information independently rather than relying on someone else to provide requested reports. Information managers can access easily includes customer orders, order fulfillment, performance, and productivity of the company. This enables managers to make quick decisions about necessary improvements for more effective operations. Early data dashboards were static, providing a picture of data at a single point in time from one perspective. Today, new technology makes these tools much more robust and interactive, allowing users to upload data sets into spreadsheet formats for further analysis (Carr, 2008).
Six Sigma was developed by Motorola in the 1980s with the main objective of ensuring processes were in place to eliminate defects and inefficiency—in other words, quality control. The main purpose of Six Sigma is to give customers more reliability, value, and high performance. Although it was mainly developed for quality control, it is now used as a way to improve communication with customers, employees, and stakeholders. It improves the communication process of relations, including the design of products. The Six Sigma program is a business improvement program that focuses on processes, variation reduction, and delivery of quantitative financial results (Six-Sigma Program, 2004).
The Balanced Scorecard is used extensively in business and industry, government, and nonprofit organizations worldwide to align business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization, improve internal and external communications, and monitor organizational performance against strategic goals. It was originated by Drs. Robert Kaplan (Harvard Business School) and David Norton as a performance measurement framework that added strategic non-financial performance measures to traditional financial metrics, giving managers and executives a more balanced view of organizational performance.
The Performance Prism is a thinking aid that combines five ideas and a structure guiding management through fundamental questions: Who are our stakeholders and what do they need? What do we want and need from our stakeholders? What strategies do we need to put in place to satisfy these wants and needs? What processes do we need to put in place to satisfy these sets of wants and needs? What capabilities need to be in place to allow us to operate our processes more effectively and efficiently? (Neely & Adams, 2000)
The Performance Pyramid stems from the idea that organizations operate at different levels, each with a different focus. However, it is important that these different levels support each other. The pyramid links business strategy with day-to-day operations. Lynch and Cross suggest measuring performance across nine dimensions, which are incorporated into the organization from corporate vision to individual objectives. Within the pyramid, corporate vision is articulated by those responsible for the strategic direction of the organization. The pyramid views a range of objectives for both external effectiveness and internal efficiency, achievable through measures at various levels.
These measures interact with each other both horizontally at each level and vertically across levels in the pyramid. At the bottom level is what Lynch and Cross refer to as "measuring in the trenches," where the objective is to enhance quality and delivery performance and reduce cycle time and waste. At this level, a number of non-financial indicators are used to measure operations. The four levels of the pyramid fit into each other in the achievement of objectives. For example, reductions in cycle time and waste increase productivity and hence profitability and cash flow (Lynch & Cross, 1991).
"Principles and requirements for system design and deployment"
There are several systems available for use. Most importantly, a business should research what is available and adapt it to their specific context. Some changes may be needed along the way, but if the objectives and goals of the business are the guiding force, an effective measurement system will result.
You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.