This paper argues that outsourcing is both a necessary and rational business practice, using Kmart as a primary case study. It examines how outsourcing generates cost savings that can be passed on to consumers and helps low-cost retailers manage overhead expenses. The paper also explores how outsourcing improves product flexibility by leveraging local market knowledge in foreign countries, drawing on examples such as McDonald's menu adaptations in India and automotive adjustments for the Chinese market. Finally, the author addresses concerns about domestic job losses by drawing a historical parallel to the agricultural-to-industrial transition in the United States, arguing that displaced workers have historically adapted to emerging industries.
In difficult economic circumstances, the practice of outsourcing has become as contentious as it is ubiquitous. With unemployment at 9.1%, many American jobs and livelihoods are in jeopardy. This concern is further compounded by the widespread belief that outsourcing hinders domestic prosperity and, by extension, economic recovery. However, outsourcing is both a necessary and rational business practice. This paper examines the merits of outsourcing and its implications for Kmart's business activities.
Outsourcing first and foremost provides cost savings to businesses that engage in the practice. These savings can potentially be passed on to consumers in the form of reduced prices. In other cases, savings benefit consumers indirectly by preventing price increases that would otherwise occur when wages, commodity prices, or inflation rise. Cost savings give companies a better means of absorbing such increases rather than simply passing them on to the consumer.
This efficiency serves two important purposes for the broader economy. First, it helps reduce inflation and protects the purchasing power of consumers. By creating more efficient processes and cost-saving mechanisms, a company does not need to raise prices as much as it otherwise would. Second, these savings leave more discretionary income in consumers' hands, giving individuals greater choice in how they spend on goods and services. This, in turn, allows further economic activity and expansion.
For Kmart, cost savings and operational efficiency are of the utmost importance. Kmart's core business model is predicated on being a low-cost producer. This approach yields very small margins but correspondingly higher asset turnover. As a low-cost producer, Kmart must be mindful of all costs associated with doing business — including inventory holding costs, theft protection, insurance, spoilage, and shifting consumer preferences. Any cost savings available to Kmart are therefore a welcome means of curtailing expanding overhead and commodity costs.
By outsourcing back-office operations that require no direct customer contact, Kmart can have those functions performed by competent personnel overseas. These specialists are often just as capable as their domestic counterparts, yet they can perform the same volume of work at considerably lower salary levels. As a result, the company benefits from lower operating costs while consumers benefit from lower product prices.
"Outsourcing improves product fit in foreign markets"
"Historical analogy defends outsourcing despite job displacement"
You’re 45% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.