This paper presents a personal reflection on attending an open Alcoholics Anonymous 12-step meeting at a local church. The author recounts navigating an unexpected entry process, observing the group's democratic decision-making, listening to a moving personal testimony, and witnessing an achievement recognition ceremony. Drawing on the experience, the paper explores how AA meetings foster cohesion, anonymity, mutual support, and accountability among members in recovery. The account ultimately challenges common stigmas surrounding addiction, framing the AA group as a community of shared purpose and compassion rather than a site of shame.
Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) groups are communities where recovering alcoholics — and those with a desire to stop drinking — meet to educate and inspire one another about their journey with alcoholism and their efforts to restore their lives. This paper presents a personal account of what I experienced during one AA group session that I attended in my locality.
I searched the internet for available open AA 12-step groups in my locality and located one whose members meet every other Saturday evening at a local church. The website stated clearly that this was a women's group, and I found it interesting to consider the specific factors that drive women to addiction and how their role at home is affected by such involvement. I contacted a classmate, and together we scheduled a visit to the church during one of the group's sessions.
Our experience began with an unexpected complication. We arrived at the church at 5:30 PM to give ourselves time to meet the members and get comfortable, as the website had indicated that meetings begin at 6:00 PM. Upon arrival, however, the caretaker at the church hall informed us that this was actually a closed group, and outside observers were not permitted to attend. We apologized for the miscommunication and indicated that we would try another group. Concerned that we had spent so much time preparing, she offered to ask the members whether they would allow us in. She informed the group leader of our situation, and the leader asked us to wait until all members had arrived so that the group could decide collectively.
The meeting opened with a prayer from one of the members, after which the leader informed the group that we were students seeking permission to observe the session. He asked whether anyone objected and made clear that if any member was uncomfortable with our presence, we would leave. No one objected outright, though several members raised privacy and anonymity concerns. We assured them of our cooperation and commitment to confidentiality, and they allowed us to stay.
This first encounter offered a glimpse into the group's democratic decision-making process — decisions were unanimous, and each member was given the opportunity to voice her opinion. The process was open and honest, and members appeared to be valued equally regardless of age or background. This form of decision-making helped create unity and cohesion among members (Gastil, 1993).
Cohesion was further expressed through the use of "we" in the recitation of the twelve steps and traditions. Phrases such as "we admitted we were powerless over alcohol" and "we made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves" reinforced a sense of shared purpose. The traditions, in turn, emphasized anonymity, a focus on promoting sobriety, and the requirement that a desire to stop drinking be the only condition for membership (Alcoholics Anonymous, 2015). Members recited all twelve steps and traditions as the group leader guided them through each section.
"Speaker's story and members' empathetic responses"
"Sobriety milestones celebrated with rewards and cake"
"How the visit reshaped the author's view of addiction"
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.