This paper examines the persuasive techniques used in children's toy advertising, with a focused analysis of Lego's Exo-Force television campaign. Drawing on consumer behavior research and child development psychology, the paper explores how the "nag factor" operates in households with children, why brand loyalty matters less in children's product marketing, and how techniques such as visual salience, animated storytelling, and product tie-ins exploit children's limited ability to recognize advertising intent. The paper also considers the ethical implications of targeting young consumers who, according to the American Psychological Association, lack the cognitive development to identify the persuasive motives behind commercials.
The paper demonstrates applied rhetorical and consumer-behavior analysis: it takes abstract marketing concepts (salience, persuasion knowledge, cognitive accessibility) from scholarly sources and maps them systematically onto a real advertisement. This "theory-to-artifact" method shows readers how academic frameworks function as interpretive tools for everyday media texts.
The paper opens with an anecdotal hook, then introduces the nag factor through academic research. It transitions into a close reading of the Lego Exo-Force campaign, progressing from visual and narrative techniques to psychological vulnerability in child audiences, and closes with a forward-looking claim about the convergence of entertainment and advertising in toy marketing.
"But all of the other kids are getting one!" Every year around Christmas, normally sensible parents devote hours to searching toy stores, malls, or online retailers to find a must-have toy for their child. Parents may defend their actions by stating that the toy is educational, encourages creativity, or simply that one is only a child once. Their real collective motivation, however, is often referred to by marketers and parents alike as the nag factor — the fact that children frequently influence purchasing decisions in a household.
A child's desire can be so powerful that parents find it almost impossible to resist, especially when dealing with advertising for children's products like toys. "The path to purchase is less direct than for adult products," note Richard Briesch, Eileen Bridges, and Chi Kin (Bennett) Yim of The University of Hong Kong. Their study, "Advertising Decisions and Children's Product Categories," found that the nag factor is effective and that frequent brand switching is common in households with children, compared to a control group of households without children.
The study concluded: "Advertising directed at adults, for adult products, tends to aim at building brand loyalty, focusing on product characteristics that are perceived to be of long-term value. On the other hand, children's products must be updated frequently, reflecting the latest theme or character in order to grab attention. Advertising aimed at children does not focus on brand loyalty, but on the new and exciting features and tie-ins that are available" (Briesch, Bridges, & Yim, 2004).
This study did not focus exclusively on children's products, but on all household purchasing decisions in general. It noted that even in areas such as dining out, buying breakfast cereals and toothpaste, and other choices that affect the health habits of the entire household, children exert a powerful influence. This influence is magnified, however, with products used exclusively by the child — perhaps because parental resistance is weaker when dealing with child-exclusive items.
The analysis by Briesch, Bridges, and Yim (2004) is highly instructive when examining Lego's campaign for its Exo-Force line of toys, which features a robotic spider. Lego is a well-known toy company with a reputation for producing high-quality products that demand constructive thinking from children. On the parents' section of its website, Lego proclaimed: "Children's natural curiosity forms the foundation of every Lego product. We foster creative development by encouraging children both to role-play and to build anything they can possibly — and impossibly — imagine!" ("Parents," 2006, Official Lego Website). Lego toys, the site asserts, do not merely sit on a shelf collecting dust; using them requires creative intellectual engagement, and the message of this section signals to parents that they should feel good about purchasing Lego products.
However, the recent incarnation of the Exo-Force product line commands children's attention rather than parental attention, through tie-ins with downloadable internet movies and comics and through its popular Japanese manga advertising style. The television commercial for the most recent Exo-Force installment opens with the ominous voice-over: "Beware the evil robot-spider, striking venom!" — presumably distinguishing it from a friendly, cuddly robotic spider.
Rather than showing children playing with the Lego toys, constructing the spiders, and using their imagination to give them distinct voices or personality traits — an image more likely to appeal to a parent — the television advertisement presents an animated, cartoon spider in the style of the Exo-Force Japanese manga motif, attacking a fortress that the heroic Exo-Forces are meant to defend. The commercial ends briefly with a depiction of the actual toy.
The salience of the advertisement is created by the detailed, highly kinetic illustration of the cartoon characters. The child's engagement with the constructed plot line, rather than with the plastic toy itself, generates the visual attraction and interest of the ad. In print advertising, "salience is created through relative choices in color, size, sharpness, and placement" (Sells & Gonzalez, 1996). In the Exo-Force commercial, the dark colors of the supposedly evil creature and the swirling cartoon motions of the narrative create salience — the attraction and desirability of watching the drama — qualities that are then transferred to the toy at the end of the advertisement.
The Exo-Force storyline is also used to sell multiple toys simultaneously. The ad tells children that they can use one of several other constructed machines "to fly and defeat the evil robot spider" — a feat achievable, of course, only with other Exo-Force toys, not products from competing lines. Still, it could be argued that these ads, however melodramatic, do reinforce some of Lego's core values that make it popular with parents as well as children. During the advertisement, for instance, one of the machines is shown demolishing a bridge where the evil spider is perched; as the spider falls into a fog-filled abyss and begins clawing its way back out, the announcer declares that "the fate of humanity is in your hands: you decide."
In other words, creative play with Legos engages the child's imagination. If the child owns the toy, the child becomes empowered to alter the script of the toy's story and the entire world of the Exo-Force. This is an effective selling technique from the parent's perspective, as it is likely to reduce parental guilt about purchasing what might otherwise seem like a plastic toy of no redeeming educational value. It also makes the child feel empowered during play — as though the fate of the world truly hangs in the balance while the child contemplates whether the spider should live or die.
The ad is therefore persuasive on two levels: the child needs more than one toy to fully participate in the world created by the advertisement, doubling the nag factor. At the same time, it could be argued that by posing the question of the spider's fate, the ad invites a degree of intellectual engagement beyond simple product possession. The child participates in the comic drama, but it is a drama engineered by Lego to generate demand for more products. Furthermore, the evolving storyline across advertisements generates novelty and sustained interest — key factors in driving children's purchasing behavior. This novelty-seeking tendency is more pronounced in children than in adults, who are generally more brand-loyal, a pattern that becomes more pronounced with consumer age.
The Lego ads, through the cartoon-to-real-world format and the empowering "you decide" language, allow the brand to cover its bases: generating excitement and the nag factor in children while still promoting the reputable, creativity-encouraging brand that parents respect. The return to "real life" at the end of the advertisement also helps both children and parents identify the toys on store shelves.
Another persuasive element that enhances the ad's effectiveness is its "busyness" — its heavy use of action — which makes it initially difficult to recognize as an advertisement rather than simply a cartoon. If a child encountered this ad while watching cartoons, the confusion of focus and intent would be significantly magnified. Research on consumer behavior has noted: "When an ulterior persuasion motive is highly accessible, both cognitively busy targets and unbusy observers use persuasion knowledge to evaluate the salesperson. When an ulterior motive is less accessible, cognitively busy targets are less likely to use persuasion knowledge, evaluating the salesperson as more sincere than are cognitively unbusy observers" (Campbell & Kirmani, 2000, p. 69). Persuasive techniques such as salience and brand recognition appeals can be deliberately filtered out when the consumer is focused, but when attention is diverted — for example, by following the story of an ad — the consumer is actually more, not less, open to influence, because critical evaluation of the advertiser's motive is less likely to occur.
Is the Lego robotic spider likely to sell? Very likely — and if it does not, it is only because other ads even more effectively make use of product tie-ins, media-based story-like advertisements, and other persuasive, intense, and salient techniques that draw children into watching commercials and stimulate them to deploy the nag factor. Media-saturated children and parents who cannot say no have created a kind of perfect storm of marketing opportunity for toy companies, which are growing increasingly skilled at blurring the already-confusing lines between advertising and entertainment.
You’re 75% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.