Essay Undergraduate 749 words

Luigi Pirandello's "War": Propaganda vs. Parental Grief

~4 min read

Abstract

This essay analyzes Luigi Pirandello's 1919 short story "War," arguing that the narrative subverts traditional action-driven plot structure in favor of an emotionally revealing portrait of parents who have surrendered their sons to World War I. The paper examines how Pirandello uses characterization, an omniscient narrative voice, and dramatic irony to expose the hollowness of patriotic propaganda. Through close reading of key scenes — including the grieving mother, the quarreling passengers, and the fat man's rhetorical collapse — the essay demonstrates that the story's true subject is the psychological and emotional cost of war on the home front.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

The essay builds its argument progressively, moving from surface observations about plot structure to deeper claims about propaganda and political critique, giving readers a clear analytical throughline.
Close textual evidence — including direct quotations with page numbers — anchors each interpretive claim, demonstrating how literary analysis should balance assertion with proof.
The paper identifies a specific narrative technique (the omniscient, dispassionate narrator) and explains precisely how Pirandello uses it to create ironic distance from the patriotic rhetoric he is critiquing.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates dramatic irony as an analytical lens: it shows how Pirandello positions the reader to see through the fat man's propaganda before the character himself can, then tracks the moment that character's self-deception collapses. This technique — identifying the gap between what a character claims and what the text reveals — is a transferable close-reading skill applicable across literary analysis.

Structure breakdown

The essay opens with a thesis reframing the story's subject (emotional revelation rather than action), then moves through the text in narrative order: the mourning mother, the quarreling passengers, the fat man's speech, and finally the climactic breakdown. Each paragraph introduces a new element of the story and ties it back to the central argument about the emptiness of war rhetoric. The conclusion is embedded in the final paragraph's reading of the climax rather than stated separately.

Introduction: A War Story Without Battle

On its surface, the 1919 short story "War" by Luigi Pirandello does not fit the traditional plot-driven arc of short story telling. Despite its title, it does not revolve around an exciting battle or even a young man's decision to forgo fighting in the "war to end all wars," as World War I was known. However, by depicting the conflicted emotions of parents who have surrendered their sons to fight for their country, Pirandello shows the emptiness of war rhetoric and propaganda, and creates a plot structure driven not by action, but by the emotional revelations of mourning parents on a train.

The Grieving Mother and the Cost of Deployment

The story begins with a group of travelers, the most notable of whom is an older, fragile woman who seems traumatized because she is sending her son off to war. This motherly woman, described as "bulky" and dressed in "deep mourning," is followed by a small, pale husband who seems both embarrassed and attentive to his emotional wife (Pirandello 106). Although her son is not yet dead, because of the young man's orders to fight she is already mourning him as if he were gone. This illustrates the tremendous violence and likely casualties of trench warfare: parents knew that when their children were deployed, they might never see their boys again.

The deployed young man is described as a student — perhaps attempting to elevate himself above the status of his lower-class parents through education. But now that dream has died, and his mother cries out like a wounded animal at the waste of her boy's life.

Passengers at Odds: Resistance Turned Inward

One of the extraordinary aspects of Pirandello's story is that the other passengers with deployed sons are not especially sympathetic to the bereaved mother. Instead, they engage in petty arguments about whether it is worse to lose one son or two. This method of characterization illustrates how often people futilely resist warfare by turning against one another rather than against the political system that creates war in the first place. The need for effective resistance — a banding together of citizens against states that engage in armed conflict — is one of the dominant themes of "War."

2 Locked Sections · 270 words remaining

The Fat Man's Patriotic Rhetoric · 115 words

"Fat man argues sons belong to Country, not parents"

The Collapse of Propaganda: Climax and Revelation · 155 words

"Mother's question breaks the fat man's patriotic facade"

Conclusion

Pirandello's "War" ultimately argues that no amount of patriotic language can insulate a parent from the reality of a child's death. The fat man's final collapse into tears makes this truth unavoidable, exposing the emptiness at the heart of war propaganda and affirming the story's central claim: that grief, not glory, is the true currency of war on the home front.

You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

War Rhetoric Parental Grief Dramatic Irony Home Front Omniscient Narrator Patriotic Propaganda Trench Warfare World War I Emotional Revelation Political Critique