This essay examines plagiarism as both an academic and professional problem, tracing its definition, its facilitation by the internet, and its appearance in high-profile cases involving a BBC psychiatrist and a celebrity cookbook dispute. The paper analyzes the most common rationales students and professionals offer for plagiarizing — stress, indifference, and language barriers — and argues that none of these excuses is sufficient justification. It then proposes a four-part prevention framework addressing the responsibilities of students, professors, academic institutions, and professional oversight bodies, ultimately arguing that structural inequities in education contribute to plagiarism and must be addressed at the systemic level.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper demonstrates anticipate-and-refute argumentation: it enumerates the most common excuses for plagiarism (stress, indifference, language barriers) and methodically dismantles each one before moving to constructive solutions. This technique strengthens the thesis by showing the writer has considered opposing viewpoints and found them wanting.
The essay opens with a definition and scope section, then examines how technology both enables and detects plagiarism. A middle section surveys professional and high-profile cases. The argument then pivots to analyzing student excuses before concluding with a prescriptive four-part prevention framework and a broader call for systemic educational reform. This problem–cause–solution arc is a reliable model for persuasive academic writing.
Plagiarism is a serious affront to academic integrity. Derived from a Latin word meaning to kidnap or steal, plagiarism generally refers to passing off someone else's words or ideas as one's own. However, copying and pasting text from a website or transcribing verbatim from an encyclopedia is not the only form plagiarism can take. Plagiarism may also refer to using someone else's core ideas without giving proper credit. A student who retrieves a master's thesis from an old database of papers and submits it as their own is committing both plagiarism and academic fraud.
Preventing plagiarism from a student's standpoint is relatively straightforward. Citing all sources used — and especially offering in-text citations or footnotes for borrowed or paraphrased passages — is the easiest way to avoid plagiarism. Students who are unfamiliar with the rules of academic citation can seek assistance at their school's library or from a professor or writing tutor. Professors can strictly enforce rules regarding academic integrity when a student is caught plagiarizing, but ultimately the responsibility rests with the student.
Technology is having a dual effect on plagiarism. On the one hand, new media such as the internet makes it easy for students to cut and paste whole blocks of text from websites directly into their own essays. On the other hand, technology has also been developed to prevent such copying. Software that scans the internet — including services like Turnitin — is making plagiarism increasingly difficult to conceal.
Yet students may also be plagiarizing inadvertently. For example, a student might browse the internet or the library for reference material without any intention of stealing ideas or words. Subconsciously, however, other people's words and theories can creep into their work. Without realizing what they have done, a student may have absorbed ideas so thoroughly from their sources that those ideas surface later as apparently original thought. For this reason, students conducting research for academic papers should always record every source they consult. Doing so may seem tedious, but it ultimately prevents the personal humiliation and academic penalties — including expulsion — associated with plagiarism.
The concept of plagiarism can also be extended to encompass a broad range of unethical practices. Related to plagiarism is the student use of pre-written term papers or essays purchased online from websites or private vendors. Many such vendors do not charge for some of the papers they offer, making these services easily accessible even to students on a tight budget. The internet is rife with term-paper vendor sites, which demonstrates how pervasive plagiarism has become and how online resources facilitate academic fraud.
Plagiarism is not limited to academia. Prominent artists, musicians, scientists, and journalists have all been caught stealing other people's ideas. The problem is severe enough that the legal system struggles to keep pace with offenders and adequately protect citizens' intellectual property. Intellectual property law addresses issues such as downloading music for free using peer-to-peer software. Digital music files can themselves be a vehicle for plagiarism — for instance, when a musician samples another's work without offering proper credit. Copying another artist's work and selling the result is a visual-arts version of plagiarism. Authors whose books closely resemble the works of others are often professionally shunned.
Jessica Seinfeld, wife of the famous comedian, was sued for plagiarism — proving that celebrities are not immune to committing or being prosecuted for the act. Jerry Seinfeld defended his wife against what he thinly dismissed as "vegetable plagiarism" (as cited in CNN and the Associated Press, 2007). Jessica Seinfeld's cookbook reportedly contained ideas simultaneously published in another cookbook focused on helping children eat more vegetables. Although the Seinfelds denied the accusations, plagiarism is certainly no joke.
Science is equally vulnerable. Even at the most prestigious universities, plagiarism is a recurring problem. In 2005, an associate professor of biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) was fired for "fabricating data" (Cook & Bombardieri, 2005). A high-profile psychiatrist who worked for the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) was subsequently suspended from practicing medicine for "passing off other scholars' work as his own," including four research papers and a book (Batty, 2008). Moreover, the psychiatrist "admitted plagiarism but denied his actions were dishonest and liable to bring his profession into disrepute" (Batty, 2008). The psychiatrist, Raj Persaud, claimed he was "in a confused mental state at the time due to the stress he was under to meet publishing deadlines" — as if stress were a plausible excuse for stealing someone else's work (Batty, 2008).
Rationales for plagiarizing people's work range from "I was under stress" to "I don't care about the class" to "I don't speak English well enough to write." Each of the excuses students — or professionals — use is spurious.
Being under stress is no excuse to act unethically. A criminal might claim that stress drove him to violence; a murderer might argue that stress provoked the act. Stress is therefore a wholly inadequate reason to offer for stealing someone else's work. Students who feel that their deadlines cannot be met need only be honest with their academic advisors and professors. Stress is a serious problem that can lead to major health issues, and most professors are sympathetic. If a professor insists on failing a student for missing a deadline, the student should report the matter to their dean. Ultimately, education is about learning and intellectual growth, not about making students' lives miserable. If academic institutions are becoming so demanding as to be inhumane, then deep changes to the educational system are necessary.
If Persaud would have failed without plagiarizing, perhaps he was not ready for his advanced degree. Acting unethically should never be an option — especially for someone who aspires to treat people for mental illness. Ironically, the psychiatrist could not find adequate means of managing his own stress and resorted to plagiarism rather than healthier alternatives.
You’re 40% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.