This paper examines key provisions of the American Psychological Association's Ethics Code and their practical implications for working psychologists and researchers. Drawing on the APA's Ethical Principles of Psychologists and the National Academies' guide to responsible research conduct, the paper addresses six major ethical domains: plagiarism and authorship credit, risk assessment, informed consent, privacy and confidentiality, data handling and reporting, and the treatment of mistakes in scientific research. Throughout, the author reflects on how each standard would guide personal professional practice, emphasizing that adherence to ethical norms protects patients, colleagues, and the broader scientific community.
Whether experimenting on animals, conducting human trials, or engaging in social and scientific research, researchers must adhere to established ethical principles. Study participants who open up their lives to researchers rely on those researchers to carry out their work without causing harm.
The American Psychological Association (APA) is the largest psychological organization in the United States, with a goal of conveying psychological knowledge to the general public. The application, intent, and practical considerations of its standards are discussed in the overview of the Ethics Code. The Preamble and General Principles serve as mentoring guides for psychologists; while not mandatory, psychologists are encouraged to consider them as aspirational ethical ideals. The ethical standards, by contrast, set obligatory rules of conduct. Most are written to apply to psychologists depending on their roles and circumstances. The ethical ideals are not exhaustive, but the absence of a specific behavior from the standards does not automatically make it ethical or unethical.
The APA Ethics Code applies to APA member psychologists and to their professional activities, which include scientific research, clinical practice, psychological therapy, supervision of staff, public service, instrument development, educational consultation, forensic activities, and organizational design assessment. The Code also governs the handling of personal identifying information such as name, address, and electronic communications. The ethical standards are strictly followed by APA members across all of these activities.
APA member psychologists are governed by specific ethical rules regarding their written work, which must be followed at all times.
First, no psychologist may present even a portion of another person's work as their own, including work that is frequently cited by other members of the organization (Ethical Principles, 2010).
(a) Psychologists may only receive authorship credit for work they have actually performed or to which they have substantially contributed. The task for which authorship credit is claimed must have been genuinely executed by that individual. Following ethics rules is necessary for every psychologist, and plagiarism is considered a serious professional violation.
(b) The professional and scientific contributions of every individual involved in a publication must be accurately reflected, regardless of their current status or position. Holding an official position — even department chair — does not license a person to claim authorship credit for work they did not do. Even minor participation in the writing should be acknowledged in the footnotes or preface. The ethics rules make clear that credit cannot be taken for work not performed, and proper citations must be used for all referenced material.
(c) A student may be listed as the primary author on an article under specific circumstances, most notably when the article is substantially based on the student's doctoral dissertation. Authorship acknowledgments should be discussed as early as possible between faculty advisors and students, and revisited throughout the research process wherever applicable (Ethical Principles, 2010). Both students and their peers should be well acquainted with acknowledgment requirements and apply them correctly.
(a) Judgments expressed in recommendations, evaluations, and diagnostic statements — including the documentation of any identified concern — must be based solely on sufficient information and evidence to authenticate the data used (Ethical Principles, 2010).
(b) Decisions regarding the psychological characteristics of individuals must be made only after a proper examination. As noted in Standard 9.01(c), individuals must be capable of reasoning and providing statements and assumptions in a coherent manner. When an individual is incapable of this and the efforts of the psychologist are not proving productive, that struggle must be documented. In such cases the psychologist should briefly note their assumptions and recommendations regarding the case (Ethical Principles, 2010). Accurate examination is required by the Ethics Code; if a patient is unable to make decisions independently, that must be clearly documented in the case file.
(a) Obtaining a consent form from a patient is obligatory before administering research, conducting psychotherapy sessions, or making referrals to a psychiatrist through any means of communication. Permission to continue counseling must be obtained verbally in a manner the patient understands, as required by applicable law and by the Ethics Code (Ethical Principles, 2010).
(b) There are specific provisions for persons who are unable to give consent for their treatment and have no next of kin. Psychologists must: (1) provide a clear explanation to the patient; (2) seek the patient's preferences regarding treatment; (3) act in the patient's best interest by considering those preferences; and (4) where legally required, seek permission from a court-authorized individual. When neither a court order nor a legally authorized person is required, the psychologist takes responsibility for protecting the patient's rights and well-being. If a patient is unable to provide their own consent, the next of kin should be contacted, and all relevant steps required by the Ethics Code must be followed.
While treating a patient it is essential to maintain that patient's privacy. Once a psychologist holds a patient's private information, it is their primary obligation to protect it to the fullest extent possible. Confidentiality is established and bounded by law (Ethical Principles, 2010). Keeping patient records private is strongly mandated by the Ethics Code; revealing patient information without authorization is a serious violation.
Patients should be made aware of how much of their private information will be accessed by their psychologist.
(a) When psychologists need to gather relevant background information about their patients, they should proceed through appropriate professional channels and make clear to the patient the extent and depth of the information they will be seeking (Ethical Principles, 2010).
"Protecting patient information and lawful disclosure limits"
"Responsible collection, recording, and sharing of research data"
"Correcting errors while maintaining scientific record integrity"
You’re 38% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.