This paper examines the principal-agent relationship from a stewardship perspective, focusing on how conflicts between principals (such as shareholders) and agents (such as CEOs) create agency costs and governance challenges. It reviews common mechanisms used to align agent incentives with shareholder interests — including stock options, profit-sharing plans, and pay-for-performance structures — while acknowledging their limitations and potential to encourage unethical behavior. The paper then explores the emerging stewardship model of corporate leadership, which holds that agents should act as ethical custodians of broader social and environmental interests. Drawing on business literature, it argues that stewardship can also produce superior long-term profitability through consumer trust, employee engagement, and reduced regulatory resistance.
The principal-agent relationship arises when a principal — such as investors who function as owners of an organization — allows an agent to make decisions on their behalf and to exercise an agreed-upon degree of control (Principal-agent, 2021). Problems occur when there is a conflict between the economic interests of the agent and those of the principal. One of the most critical issues is that the principal retains the assets and bears the financial risk, absorbing any losses even when an agent is responsible for a mistake (Principal-agent, 2021).
In theory, a principal can use discretion in selecting an optimal agent and dismiss the agent in the event of impropriety. The risk that the agent will make poor decisions is known as agency costs (Principal-agent, 2021). This risk may be manageable in straightforward situations — for example, a real estate agent who fails to uphold a client's interests during a house sale. However, shareholders in a corporation often hold relatively small percentages of interest in the company and are largely at the mercy of the agent's superior knowledge and power to make sound decisions.
To reduce agency costs, specific controls are often written into the contracts of CEOs and other types of corporate agents to ensure they act in ways that optimize the financial health of the firm and protect shareholder interests with the same care as if those interests were their own. Examples include offering CEOs stock options, profit-sharing plans, or linking CEO compensation directly to stock price (Principal-agent, 2021).
This approach is not foolproof. Such a link may arguably encourage unethical behavior, or at minimum unwise decisions aimed at artificially inflating stock prices rather than making meaningful, intelligent choices to build a sustainable company. On the other hand, performance-linked compensation is still preferable to so-called golden parachutes, which often incentivize risky CEO behavior by guaranteeing a generous settlement upon departure regardless of performance.
"Stewardship model as ethical leadership framework"
"Stewardship drives profit, trust, and employee quality"
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.