This paper examines the application of problem-based learning (PBL) in respiratory therapy education, tracing its theoretical foundations in constructivist learning and its emergence as an alternative to traditional lecture-based instruction. The paper reviews the literature on PBL's effectiveness in developing critical thinking, decision-making, and self-directed learning skills in respiratory therapists. It compares PBL and traditional curricula across key outcomes including standardized examination performance, student motivation, and clinical readiness, while also addressing hybrid and case-based program models. The paper ultimately evaluates the evidence for and against widespread adoption of PBL in respiratory care programs.
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis: multiple sources are woven together to build a cumulative argument rather than being cited in isolation. The author groups findings thematically (knowledge retention, motivation, clinical performance) and uses transitional framing to show where sources agree, diverge, or qualify each other. This approach models how to evaluate a body of evidence rather than simply report individual studies.
The paper opens with context about the changing demands on respiratory therapy education, then traces the historical shift from hospital-based training to accredited programs. The core body contrasts PBL with traditional instruction, introduces hybrid models, and reviews empirical evidence across several outcome categories. The paper closes by surfacing unresolved tensions in the literature, particularly around whether PBL's benefits justify its resource demands. The structure follows a problem–background–evidence–evaluation arc common in health education literature reviews.
The field of medicine is rapidly changing as new treatment options become available and technology advances. Therefore, healthcare education programs must be able to meet the needs of students in these fields and create a flexible curriculum that can evolve alongside clinical practice. Problem-based learning (PBL) was introduced to teach critical thinking and decision-making skills to respiratory therapists through the direct application of theory to practice. In respiratory therapy, where a practitioner's role has evolved from passive to becoming an active part of the treatment team, these skills are becoming increasingly important.
Allied healthcare professionals, including respiratory therapists, are increasingly in demand due to the steady growth in the number of patients — possibly attributable to the aging of the baby boom generation — presenting to the healthcare system (Andrews, Byington, Masini, Keene, & Burker, 2008). Yet studies have shown that respiratory care education programs have a higher attrition rate than those of other allied health professions (Andrews et al., 2008). This increasing demand for respiratory professionals is not currently being met through traditional education methods, which has led to the exploration of alternative techniques to engage and retain students (Murphy, Hartigan, Walshe, Flynn, & O'Brien, 2010).
The goal of any teaching program is to prepare students to effectively interact with the ever-changing expectations of their profession (Murphy et al., 2010). This is especially true in the field of respiratory therapy, which has undergone major changes over the last five decades due to rapid advancements in technology, information available to consumers, and the aging of the population (Ceconi, Op't Holt, Zip, Olson, & Beckett, 2008). Respiratory therapists have become increasingly responsible for assessing their patients' conditions, making judgments about the appropriate course of treatment, and evaluating treatment effectiveness through patient outcomes, modifying the treatment plan where necessary (Hill, 2002). This requires therapists to possess a high level of critical thinking, assessment, and problem-solving skills (Hill, 2002).
Traditionally, training programs for respiratory therapists took place in hospital settings where educators were physicians and practitioners (Hill, 2002). These programs typically lasted under a year. Over time, respiratory therapy programs transitioned to accredited colleges as undergraduate programs and are now taught by educators who are not only practitioners but also well trained in the theories of classroom instruction (Hill, 2002). These programs must meet the increasing demands of the healthcare industry, including the documentation of positive outcomes, cost containment, and efficient patient care (Hill, 2002). They must give respiratory therapists the skills necessary to think critically and make decisions rather than simply follow a physician's orders (Hill, 2002).
PBL has emerged as a student-focused technique for educating respiratory therapists as well as other medical professionals. PBL grew out of the work of Harold Barrows, who acknowledged that students needed alternative learning methods in order to convert the subject matter learned in class into clinical practice (Rogal & Snider, 2008). PBL has been developed from the constructivist theory of education, in which learning is an active process of knowledge development where interaction fosters the incorporation of new information into existing knowledge (White et al., 2004; Beachey, 2007).
Traditional classroom curriculum emphasizes the presentation of content information and concepts through lecture format. Students are then expected to analyze, prioritize, and structure this new knowledge (Hill, 2002). Individual classes have specific focuses and learning curricula planned with specific knowledge content as the desired outcome. In this model, the professor is the expert on the information and determines what classroom interactions and activities will take place. Students are expected to take course content and apply it to real-life scenarios.
By contrast, the PBL method relies on real-life problems to facilitate a self-directed learning process (Beachey, 2007). The PBL learning environment is student-focused, with the student partnering in the learning process through the use of real-life scenarios to uncover solutions and construct their own knowledge (Mishoe, 2007; Beers, 2005; Beachey, 2007). This approach gives the student responsibility for analyzing information and communicating it to peers in their class (Beers, 2005). Specific content information is not necessarily introduced into the classroom; rather, the knowledge obtained comes directly from solving the individual case presented.
In the PBL model, the application of learning may be limited to the current situation because it emerges from a specific scenario. In this regard, the traditional learning method has broader applicability, since information is introduced in a more general context.
You’re 43% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.