Psychological Egoism: Self-Interest as the Root of All Action
This paper examines psychological egoism, the empirical doctrine holding that self-interest is the sole motivating force behind every voluntary human action. It outlines the two chief accounts of self-interest — desire satisfaction and objective well-being — before explaining how psychological egoistic hedonism extends the theory to argue that the ultimate human motive is always the pursuit of personal pleasure. The paper explores why the theory appears plausible to many people, addresses the reinterpretation of seemingly altruistic acts such as rescuing a child from a burning building, and considers the implications for morality, religion, and social doctrine. It concludes by reflecting on the role of moral education in shaping behavior.
- Introduction to Egoism and Self-Interest: Defines egoism and two accounts of self-interest
- The Doctrine of Psychological Egoism: States the empirical claim that self-interest drives all action
- Psychological Egoistic Hedonism: Describes the hedonistic version of psychological egoism
- Why Psychological Egoism Seems Plausible: Explains the theory's intuitive appeal to ordinary people
- Reinterpreting Altruism Through an Egoist Lens: Shows how egoists reframe seemingly selfless acts
- Egoism, Morality, and Social Behavior: Extends egoist logic to religion, morality, and society
- Conclusion: Moral Education and Self-Interest: Links moral education to self-interested incentives
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly defines its core concept before developing its argument, giving readers a solid foundation in both the desire-satisfaction and objective accounts of self-interest.
- It uses a vivid, concrete example — a person rescuing a child from a burning building — to illustrate how psychological egoists reinterpret apparently selfless behavior, making an abstract philosophical claim tangible.
- The paper maintains a consistent argumentative thread, moving logically from definition to application to implications for morality and education.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of charitable reconstruction followed by critical reinterpretation. It first presents commonsense intuitions about altruism at face value, then systematically shows how the psychological egoist challenges those intuitions by exposing underlying self-regarding motives — a standard move in applied philosophy and ethical theory.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with definitional groundwork on egoism and self-interest, then introduces the empirical claim of psychological egoism. It narrows to its hedonistic variant before explaining the theory's intuitive appeal. The central example of the burning-building rescue anchors the argument in a practical scenario. The paper broadens outward to cover morality, religion, and social doctrines before a brief conclusion on moral education as a behavior-shaping mechanism.
Introduction to Egoism and Self-Interest
Egoism in every form requires an explication of well-being, welfare, or self-interest. Two chief theories exist in this regard. Self-interest has been identified with personal desire satisfaction by desire or preference accounts. Usually, and most plausibly, such desires are restricted to those that are self-regarding. Although what constitutes a self-regarding desire is debatable, clear instances and counter-instances exist: desires for one's personal pleasure are self-regarding, while desires for others' welfare are not. In the objective account of self-interest, self-interest is identified with the possession of certain states — such as knowledge or virtue — assessed independently of whether they are desired or preferred (Shaver para. 1).
The Doctrine of Psychological Egoism
The empirical principle of psychological egoism states that the defining motive behind all voluntary actions is the desire for personal welfare. In this view, despite all actions being considered self-interested, egoists readily acknowledge that individuals normally attempt to conceal the true motives underlying their actions, since such concealment will often be to their personal advantage. This doctrine has been ascribed to a hypothesis widely held by ordinary people, and once accepted almost universally by political philosophers, psychologists, and economists. According to this theory, every action committed by human beings, if properly understood, reveals that it has been motivated by egotistic desires.
To put it more precisely, the psychological egoism doctrine holds that the sole thing people ultimately pursue or desire is their own self-interest. Individuals may appear to act disinterestedly and selflessly when they use others' interests as a means to promoting their own self-interest. Such universal selfishness, on this view, is no coincidence or accident but rather constitutes an inevitable result of psychological laws (Feinberg and Shafer-Landau 494).
Psychological Egoistic Hedonism
One sometimes does things out of a sense of obligation rather than desire. Whatever one does is linked to some concern that leads one to perform the action. Numerous kinds of desires and motives exist that may reasonably be termed "egoistic," and corresponding to each of these is a potential version of psychological egoism. Probably the most widely occurring version of the theory is the one that holds that every individual has a single ultimate motive underlying all of their voluntary actions, and this motive is selfish in nature.
More specifically, this ultimate motive is a particular type of self-centered desire — the desire to obtain personal pleasure. The sole ultimate desire is always the desire to gain or prolong pleasant personal experiences and to avoid or curtail unpleasant ones. This version of the theory is typically called psychological egoistic hedonism (Feinberg and Shafer-Landau 494).
Why Psychological Egoism Seems Plausible
To many people, psychological egoism appears plausible for a variety of reasons. It is widely agreed that an individual typically feels pleased when he or she obtains whatever he or she desires. To many, this suggests that what they really desire in all cases is their own pleasure, with the pursuit of other things merely acting as a means to that end. People often deceive themselves into believing they desire something noble or fine, when what they actually want is to be well-regarded by others, to congratulate themselves, or to enjoy the pleasures associated with a clear conscience.
The tendency of individuals to conceal their real motives — even from themselves — behind language such as "virtue" is well recognized. Since one may be mistaken about one's own real motives as well as those of other people, it can seem reasonable to suppose that one might always be mistaken when taking motives to be altruistic or disinterested (Feinberg and Shafer-Landau 494–95). As philosophical discussions of altruism note, distinguishing genuine concern for others from enlightened self-interest is a persistent challenge in moral psychology.
Conclusion: Moral Education and Self-Interest
Virtues like decency, morality, and good manners have to be teachable. Individuals are motivated to exhibit good behavior only when it is clear that some advantage exists for them in doing so. Psychological egoists frequently observe that the instilling of manners and moral education typically employs sanctions of pain and pleasure as its tools. Ultimately, we all look out for ourselves in order to fulfill our own needs (Feinberg and Shafer-Landau 495).
Works Cited
"Chapter 5: Psychological Egoism." The Elements of Moral Philosophy. Web. 23 May 2016.
Feinberg, Joel, and Russ Shafer-Landau. Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co, 1999. Print.
Shaver, Robert. "Egoism." Stanford University, 2002. Web. 23 May 2016.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.